Share This Article:

Do Purpose-Designed Auditory Tasks Measure General Speediness?

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:179KB) PP. 23-31
DOI: 10.4236/ijis.2012.22004    3,746 Downloads   7,895 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

This study was concerned with the measurement of General Speediness (Gs) using the auditory modality. Existing as well as purpose-developed auditory tasks that maintained the cognitive requirements of established visually presented Gs marker tests were completed by N = 80 university undergraduates. Analyses supported the results of our previous work [1] and auditory and visual tasks combined to define latent RT and Gs factors. Moreover, the analysis did not support the presence of modality-specific speed factors. Overall, this study provides further evidence suggesting that auditory tasks might successfully measure existing broad abilities defined in intelligence theories (i.e., Gf, Gc, etc.) provided they maintain the same cognitive requirements as existing visual measures of such constructs.

Cite this paper

I. Zajac, N. Burns and T. Nettelbeck, "Do Purpose-Designed Auditory Tasks Measure General Speediness?," International Journal of Intelligence Science, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2012, pp. 23-31. doi: 10.4236/ijis.2012.22004.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] I. T. Zajac, N. R. Burns and V. Danthiir, “Developing Auditory Measures of General Speediness,” SAGE Open, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2011, pp. 1-8. doi:10.1177/2158244011429333
[2] L. Stankov, T. Seizova-Cajic and R. D. Roberts, “Tactile and Kinesthetic Per-ceptual Processes within the Taxonomy of Human Cognitive Abilities,” Intelligence, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1-29. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(00)00038-6
[3] J. L. Horn and J. Noll, “A System for Understanding Cognitive Capabilities: A Theory and the Evidence on Which It Is Based,” In: D. K. Det-terman, Ed., Human Intelligence: Theories of Intelligence, Ablex, Norwood, 1994, pp. 151-203.
[4] R. D. Roberts, G. Pallier and G. N. Goff, “Sensory Processes within the Structure of Human Cognitive Abilities,” In: P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyl-lonen and R. D. Roberts, Eds., Learning and Individual Differ-ences: Process, Trait, and Content Determinants, American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 1999, pp. 339-368. doi:10.1037/10315-015
[5] L. Stankov, “Hierarchical Struc-ture of Auditory Abilities and Relationship between Auditory and Visual Modalities,” University of Denver, Denver, 1971.
[6] J. B. Carroll, “Human Cognitive Abilities: A Sur-vey of Factor-Analytic Studies,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511571312
[7] L. Stankov, “Auditory Abilities,” In: R. J. Sternberg, Ed., Ency-clopedia of Human Intelligence, Macmillan, New York, 1994, pp. 157-162.
[8] K. Seidel, “Assesment of Social and Audi-tory Intelligence: New Persepctives and Approaches,” Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, 2008.
[9] R. D. Roberts, et al., “Charting the Cognitive Sphere: Tactile-Kinesthetic Perform-ance within the Structure of Intelligence,” Intelligence, 1997, Vol. 25, pp. 111-148.
[10] V. Danthiir, et al., “What the Nose Knows Olfaction and Cognitive Abilities,” Intelligence, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2001, pp. 337-361. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00061-7
[11] L. Stankov and J. L. Horn, “Human Abilities Revealed through Auditory Tests,” Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 72, No. 1, 1980, pp. 21-44. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.72.1.21
[12] J. L. Horn and L. Stankov, “Auditory and Visual Factors of Intelligence,” Intelligence, Vol. 62, No. 2, 1982, pp. 165-185. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(82)90012-5
[13] L. Stankov, “Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence and Broad Perceptual Factors among 11 to 12 Year Olds,” Journal of Educational Psychol-ogy, Vol. 70, No. 3, 1978, pp. 324-334. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.70.3.324
[14] L. Stankov, J. L. Horn and T. Roy, “On the Relationship between Gf/Gc Theory and Jensen’s Level I/Level II Theory,” Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 72, No. 6, 1980, pp. 796-809. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.72.6.796
[15] N. R. Burns and T. Net-telbeck, “Inspection Time in the Structure of Cognitive Abili-ties: Where Does IT Fit?” Intelligence, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2003, pp. 237-255. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00120-4
[16] C. Brand and I. J. Deary, “Intelligence and Inspection Time,” In: H. J. Eysenck and M. Berger, Eds., A Model for Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982, pp. 133- 148.
[17] H. Olsson, et al., “Auditory Inspection Time: On the Importance of Selecting the Appropri-ate Continuum,” Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 25, No. 4, 1998, pp. 627-634. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00061-0
[18] D. M. Parker, J. R. Crawford and E. Stephen, “Auditory Inspection Time and Intel-ligence: A New Spatial Loca- lisation Task,” Intelligence, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1999, pp. 131-139. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00011-2
[19] C. McCrory and C. Cooper, “The Relationship between Three Auditory Inspection Time Tasks and General Intelligence,” Personality and Indi-vidual Differences, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2005, pp. 1835-1845. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.012
[20] I. T. Zajac and N. R. Burns, “Measuring Auditory Inspection Time in Primary School Children,” Journal of Individual Differences, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2007, pp. 45-52. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.45
[21] I. T. Zajac and N. R. Burns, “Relationships between Three Auditory Inspection Time Tasks and Processing Speed,” Australian Journal of Psychol-ogy, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2011, pp. 163-172. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00020.x
[22] J. McPherson and N. R. Burns, “A Speeded Coding Task Using a Com-puter-Based Mouse Response,” Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2005, pp. 538-544. doi:10.3758/BF03192725
[23] R. B. Ekstrom, et al., “Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests,” Educational Testing Ser-vice, Princeton, 1976.
[24] V. Danthiir, et al., “Factor Struc-ture and Validity of Paper-and-Pencil Measures of Mental Speed: Evidence for a Higher-Order Model?” Intelligence, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2005, pp. 491-514. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.03.003
[25] R. D. Roberts and L. Stankov, “Individual Differences in Speed of Mental Process-ing and Human Cognitive Abilities: Toward a Taxonomic Model,” Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1999, pp. 1-120. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(00)80007-2
[26] G. Evans and T. Nettelbeck, “Inspection Time: A Flash Mask to Reduce Ap-parent Movement Effects,” Persona- lity and Individual Dif-ferences, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1993, pp. 91-94. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90045-5
[27] G. B. Wetherill and H. Levitt, “Sequential Estimation of Points on a Psychometric Function,” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1965, pp. 1-10. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1965.tb00689.x
[28] L. K. Muthen and B. O. Muthen, “Mplus User’s Guide,” 5th Edition, Muthen and Muthen, Los Angeles, 2007.
[29] J. L. Horn, “Organiza-tion of Abilities and the Development of Intelligence,” Psycho-logical Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, 1968, pp. 242-259. doi:10.1037/h0025662

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.