Risk of Pacemaker Patients by TASER X26 Contact Mode Application

DOI: 10.4236/jemaa.2012.42012   PDF   HTML   XML   4,587 Downloads   7,369 Views   Citations


The prevalence of pacemaker patients among the general population and of conducted energy devices (CED) for law enforcement and self-defence is increasing. Consequently, the question whether cardiac pacemaker (CPM) patients are on particular risk becomes increasingly important. The risk of Taser X26 electric interference with implanted CPM has been investigated by numerical simulation at MRI-based anatomical models of CPM patients with devices implanted at conventional sites (left pectoral, right pectoral and abdominal) and with the monopolar CPM electrode placed at the ventricular apex. In spite of 10fold higher peak voltages the different coupling conditions make Taser-induced CPM interference voltages lower than those caused by external cardiac defibrillators. It is shown that electric interference considerably depends on ECD electrode orientation. The most unfavourable conditions are encountered with ECD electrodes aligned with the line from the CPM electrode tip to CPM can (EPC line). It could be shown that worst case interference voltages of monopolar pacemakers of any kind of implantation remain below the pulse immunity level as defined in safety standards of implantable cardiac pacemakers and of cardioverter defibrillators. However, interference voltages exceed CPM sensing thresholds. Therefore, capturing should be expected at Taser X26 contact mode application at any position at the upper part of the body including the abdomen, both at frontal and dorsal positions.

Share and Cite:

N. Leitgeb, F. Niedermayr, R. Neubauer and G. Loos, "Risk of Pacemaker Patients by TASER X26 Contact Mode Application," Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2012, pp. 96-100. doi: 10.4236/jemaa.2012.42012.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] IEC 60601-2-4, “Medical Electrical Equipment Part 2. Particular Requirements for the Safety of Cardiac Defibrillators and Cardiac Defibrillator-Monitors,” 2010.
[2] A. Markewitz, “Annual Report on the German Cardiac Pacemaker Register,” 2011. http://www.pacemaker-register.de
[3] E. H. Holder Jr., L. O. Robinson and J. H. Laub, “Police Use of Force, Tasers and Other Less-Lethal Weapons,” National Institute of Justice Report, 2011. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/232215.pdf
[4] D. Lakkireddy, D. Wallick, K. Ryschon, M. Chung, J. Butany, D. Martin, W. Saliba, W. Kowalewski, A. Natale and P. Tchou, “Effects of Cocaine Intoxication in the Threshold for stun gun induction of Ventricular Fibrillation,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2006, pp. 805-811. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.03.055
[5] S. R. Vanga, S. Bommana, M. W. Kroll, C. Swerdlow and D. Lakkireddy, “TASER Conducted Electrical Weapons and Implanted Pacemakers and Defibrillators,” Proceed- ings of the International Conference IEEE EMBS, Min- neapolis, 2-6 September 2009, pp. 3199-3204.
[6] Taser Inc., “Taser? X3TM, X26TM, and M26TM ECD Warnings, Instructions, and Information: Law Enforce- ment,” Taser International Inc., Scottsdale, 2009.
[7] M. Cao, J. S. Shinbane, J. M. Gillberg and L. A. Saxon, “Taser-Induced Rapid Ventricular Myocardial Capture Demonstrated by Pacemaker Intracardial Electrograms,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Vol. 18, No. 8, 2007, pp. 876-879. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00881.x
[8] P. J. Dimbylow, “FDTD Calculations of the Whole Body Averaged SAR in an Anatomically Realistic Voxel Model of the Human Body from 1 MHz to 1 GHz,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 42, 1997, pp. 479-490. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/42/3/003
[9] S. R. Gabriel, W. Lau and C. Gabriel, “The Dielectric Properties of Biologic Tissues: Measurement in the Frequency Range 10 Hz - 20 GHz,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 41, 1996, pp. 2251-2269. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/002
[10] CST Studio? Suite 2009, “CST GmbH, Bad Nauheimer Stra?e 19, D-64289,” Darmstadt, 2009. www.cst.com
[11] N. Leitgeb, F. Niedermayr, G. Loos and R. Neubauer, “Cardiac Fibrillation Risk of Taser X-26 Dart Mode Application,”Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, Vol. 161, No. 21-22, 2011, pp. 571-577. doi:10.1007/s10354-011-0038-z
[12] N. Leitgeb, F. Niedermayr, R. Neubauer and G. Loos, “Numerically Simulated Cardiac Exposure to Electric Current Densities Induced by TASER X-26 Pulses in Adult Men,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 55, 2010, pp. 6187-6195. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/20/010
[13] Taser Inc., “TASER? Electronic Control Devices. Elec- trical Characteristics—X-26TM,” Taser International Tech- nical Specifications, 1 February 2009.
[14] N. Leitgeb, A. Omerspahic and F. Niedermayr, “Exposure of Non-Target Tissue in Medical Diathermy,” Bioelectro- magnetics, Vol. 31, 2010, pp. 12-19.
[15] IEC 45502-1, “Active Implantable Medical Devices Part 1: General Requirements for Safety, Marking and Informa- tion Provided by the Manufacturer,” 1997.
[16] EN 45502-2-2, “Active Implantable Medical Devices. Part 2-2: Particular Requirements for Active Implantable Medical Devices Intended to Treat Tachyarrhythmia (Includes Implantable Defibrillators),” 2008.
[17] ANSI/AAMI PC69, “Active Implantable Medical De- vices-Electromagnetic Compatibility-EMC Test Protocols for Implantable Cardiac Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators,” 2007.
[18] IEC 45502-2-1, “Active Implantable Medical Devices. Part 2-1: Particular Requirements for Active Implantable Medical Devices Intended to Treat Bradyarrhythmia (Cardiac Pacemakers),” 2003.
[19] ICNIRP, “Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time- Varying Electric and Magnetic Fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz),” Health Physics, Vol. 99, No. 6, 2010, pp. 818-836.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.