Clayey Sand Soil's Behaviour Analysis and Imaging Subsurface Structure via Engineering Characterizations and Integrated Geophysicals Tomography Modeling Methods

Andy Anderson Bery, Rosli Saad

.
Geophysics Section, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.

DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2012.31011                

Abstract

The geoelectrical resistivity and seismic refraction surveys which were used in this study on the test site, delivered a detailed image of the near-surface conditions in generally very good. Electrical resistivity and seismic refraction analysis proved that a combination of these integrated study of the physical environmental data provided a reasonable compromise between measurement time and image resolution. Quantitative interpretation of the resistivity and seismic models based on soil's parameters determined using laboratory practices and field survey could reproduce the range of resistivity and seismic values found on the site very well. The model explains the ambiguity in between resistivity and clayey sands found on the site and predict the dominant role of water saturation. Geophysical methods are used in this research in purpose to determine the internal structure of a soil mass. Various geophysical methods and their merits for imaging subsurface structures and condition are discussed. Seismic methods are often the most suitable because the measurements depend on the mechanical properties which are also important in the mechanical calculation of soil's behaviour analysis. Other geophysical method, such as geoelectric resistivity, is useful to determine the internal structure, but require a correlation of found boundaries with mechanical properties. This research was conducted to investigate the subsurface structures and conditions through geotechnical engineering properties and its geophysical characteristics. The computation analysis is used in this research in purpose to investigate clayey sand soil's behaviour. Electrical resistivity test and engineering laboratory practices such as soil strength test, liquid limit test, plastic limit test and grain size distribution test was also carried out to investigate clayey sand soil behaviour in Batu Uban, Penang area during monitoring period.

Keywords

Geoelectrical Resistivity; Seismic Refraction; Soil's Behaviour; Investigate; Monitoring Period

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	R. J. Small and M. J. Clark, “Slope and Weathering,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
[2]	R. Z. Abidin and B. Sujak, “Relationship between Rainfall and Landslide Events in Malaysia,” International Conference on Geotechnical and Highway Engineering (Geotropika), Kuala Lampur, 26-27 May 2008.
[3]	A. A. Bery, R. Saad, N. M. Mustaza, N. A. Ismail, N. El Hidayah Ismail and E. Tonnizam, “Slope Stability Analysis via Soil’s Geotechnical Properties and Its Geophysical Characterizations,” National Geoscience Conference, Malaysia, 11-12 June 2011.
[4]	B. Heincke, T. Gunther, E. Dalsegg, J. S. Ronning, G. V. Ganerod and H. Elvebakk, “Combined Three Dimensional Electrical and Seismic Tomography Studies on the Anknes Rockslide in Western Norway,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, in press.
[5]	D. Jongmans, G. Bievre, F. Renalier, S. Schwartz, N. Beauresz and Y. Orengo, “Geophysical Investigation of a Large Landslide in Glaciolacustrine Clays in the Trieves Area (French Alps),” Engineering Geology, Vol. 109, No. 1-2, 2009, pp. 45-56. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.10.005
[6]	S. Thevanayagam and G. R. Martin, “Liquefaction in Silty Soils—Screening and Remediation Issues,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 9-12, 2002, pp. 1035-1042. doi:10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00128-8
[7]	V. C. Xenaki and G. A. Athanasopoulos, “Liquefaction Resistance of Sand-Silt Mixtures: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Fines,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2003, pp. 183- 194. doi:10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00210-5
[8]	S. A. Naeini and M. H. Baziar, “Effect of Fines Content on Steady-State Strength of Mixed and Layered Samples of Sand,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2004, pp. 181-187. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.11.003
[9]	P. V. Lade, C. D. Liggio Jr. and J. A. Yamamuro, “Effects of Non-Plastic Fines on Minimum and Maximum Void Ratios of Sand,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1998, pp. 336-347. doi:10.1520/GTJ11373J
[10]	B. O. Hardin, “1-D Strain in Normally Consolidated Cohesionless Soils,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 113, No. 12, 1987, pp. 1449-1467. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:12(1449)
[11]	J. M. Pestana and A. J. Whittle, “Compression Model for Cohesionless Soils,” Geotechnique, Vol. 45, No. 4, 1995, pp. 611-631. doi:10.1680/geot.1995.45.4.611
[12]	J. A. Yamamuro, P. A. Bopp and P. V. Lade, “One Dimensional Compression of Sands at High Pressures,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 122, No. 2, 1996, pp. 147-154. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:2(147)
[13]	F. A. Chuhan, A. Kjeldstad, K. Bjorlykke and K. Hoeg, “Experimental Compression of Loose Sands: Relevance to Porosity Reduction during Burial in Sedimentary Basins,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2003, pp. 995-1011. doi:10.1139/t03-050
[14]	F. David, “Essentials of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Basic Geotechnics,” 6th Edition, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, 2007.
[15]	A. Shakoor and E. H. Barefild, “Relationship between Unconfined Compressive Strength and Degree of Saturation for Selected Sandstones,” Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2009, pp. 29-40. doi:10.2113/gseegeosci.15.1.29
[16]	B. Vásárhelyi and P. Ván, “Influence of Water Content on the Strength of Rock,” Engineering Geology, Vol. 84, No. 1-2, 2006, pp. 70-74. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.011
[17]	M. Romana and B. Vásárhelyi, “A Discussion on the Decrease of Unconfined Compressive Strength between Saturated and Dry Rock Samples,” Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain, 2007.
[18]	E. Barefield and A. Shakoor, “The Effect of Degree of Saturation on the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Selected Sandstones,” International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment, The Geological Society of London, 2006.
[19]	A. Namdar, “Mineralogy in Geotechnical Engineering. Mysore University, India,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2010, pp. 108-110.
[20]	T. C. Kenney, “Residual Strength of Mineral Mixtures,” Proceedings 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1, 1977, pp. 155-160.
[21]	J. K. Lupini, A. E. Skinner and P. R. Vaughan, “The Drained Residual Strength of Cohesive Soils,” Geotechnique, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1981, pp. 181-213. doi:10.1680/geot.1981.31.2.181
[22]	J. H. Yin, “Properties and Behaviour of Hong Kong Marine Deposits with Different Clay Contents,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 36, No. 6, 1999, pp. 1085- 1095.
[23]	H. Rahardjo, E. C. Leong and S. K. Tang, “Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Singapore Residual Soils,” Proceeding of Specialty Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2003, pp. 1279- 1304.
[24]	E. Tonnizam, I. Komoo, K. A. Kassim and N. Gofar, “Influence of Moisture Content on the Strength of Weathering Sandstone,” Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2008, pp. 137-144.
[25]	N. Fabiola, B. Giarola, A. P. da Silva, S. Imhoff and A. R. Dexter, “Contribution of Natural Soil Compaction on Hardsetting Behaviour,” Geoderma, Vol. 113, No. 1-2, 2003, pp. 95-108. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00333-6