Digital Renaissance: The Creative Potential of Narrative Technology in Education


This paper outlines research which explores the potential of narrative technology: the synergy of storytelling and computing to enhance creativity and creative education. The paper outlines the theoretical basis of the research: n?ogenic narrative, which is informed by contemporary debates and themes in the educational sciences. These include narrativity and storytelling in education; and positive and humanistic psychology. Furthermore, from an empirical/practical perspective, a number of examples of narrative technology are presented and discussed. These exemplify the principal ways in which narrative technology has been deployed in the research-enhanced teaching outlined in this paper: as both a pedagogical, and as a reflective methodology. The paper concludes with insights regarding the deployment of narrative technology to enhance creativity and creative education; and how the synergy of storytelling and computing is potentially affording new possibilities for a digital renaissance in education and educational technology.

Share and Cite:

Hall, T. (2012). Digital Renaissance: The Creative Potential of Narrative Technology in Education. Creative Education, 3, 96-100. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.31016.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Aristotle. (c.335 BC/2007) Poetics. US: Forgotten Books.
[2] Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[3] Bruner, J. (2002). Making Stories: Law, Literature, Life. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
[4] Bruner, J. (2007). Cultivating the possible. URL (last checked 16 November 2011).
[5] Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[6] EU Kids Online. (2011). EU Kids Online Final Report. URL (last checked 28 September 2011).
[7] Frankl, V. E. (1946/2006). Man’s Search for Meaning. UK: Beacon Press.
[8] Futurelab. (2010). Digital Literacy Professional Development Resource. URL (last checked 26 September 2011).
[9] Futurelab. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum. URL (last checked 26 September 2011).
[10] Hall, T., Duignan, S., & Long, B. T. (2011). Quality through synergy: Technology-enhanced learning (animation, virtualisation and multi- user virtual environments (MUVEs) in higher education. In T. Hourigan, L. Murray and E. Riordan, (Eds.), Quality issues in ICT integration: Third level disciplines and learning contexts (pp. 28-46). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[11] Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379-424. doi:10.1080/07370000802212669
[12] Korthagen, F. (2011). Moving from the inside out: Connecting practice, theory, and person. International Association of Physical Education in Higher Education 2011 Conference, Limerick, 22-25 June 2011.
[13] Pearse, P. H. (1916/2010). The murder machine. URL (last checked 6 November 2011).
[14] Plowman, L., & Stephen, C. (2003). A “benign addition”? A review of research on ICT and pre-school children. Journal of Computer-As- sisted Learning, 19, 149-164. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00016.x
[15] Rizza, C. (2011). ICT and initial teacher education: National policies. OECD Education Working Papers, 61, 55. doi:10.1787/5kg57kjj5hs8-en
[16] Schank, R. (1990). Tell me a story: Narrative and intelligence. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
[17] Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.
[18] Strawson, G. (2004). Against narrativity. Ratio, 17, 428-452. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9329.2004.00264.x

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.