A method to fabricate small features on scaffolds for tissue engineering via selective laser sintering
S. Lohfeld, M. A. Tyndyk, S. Cahill, N. Flaherty, V. Barron, P. E. McHugh
.
DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2010.32019   PDF    HTML     5,388 Downloads   10,808 Views   Citations

Abstract

Purpose: Selective laser sintering (SLS) is a rapid pro- totyping technique applied to produce tissue-engineer- ing scaffolds from powder materials. The standard scanning technique, however, often produces struts of extensive thickness, which means fabrication of high- ly porous scaffolds with small overall dimensions is quite difficult. Nevertheless, this study aims to overcome this shortfall. Design/methodology/approach: To this end, three scanning methods were evaluated in terms of minimum feature size and freedom of design, using a test polyamide (PA) material. Polycaprolactone (PCL) was then employed to create highly porous 3D scaffolds using the preferred scanning me- thod to produce thin struts. Findings: While in normal scanning mode some features were well above the laser spot diameter, strut thicknesses below the laser spot diameter were achieved when using the “outline scan” function for PA material. Those achieved for PCL were slightly higher and in the 500-800 ?m range, with an average pore size of 400 µm. Investigations on the properties of the scaffolds revealed an effective compression modulus of the PCL scaffold of 6.5 MPa. Furthermore, there was no change in physical or che- mical properties when the scaffolds were stored in a physiological environment for 7 weeks. Originality/ value: Though SLS is considered as a fabrication te- chnique for tissue engineering scaffolds, actually pro- duced scaffolds did not comply with porosity requirements and limitations of the SLS process in produ- cing features at the size of the laser beam spot have not been discussed. The present paper shows the capabilities of the SLS process based on two materials and presents a method to minimize feature size in scaffolds.

Share and Cite:

Lohfeld, S. , Tyndyk, M. , Cahill, S. , Flaherty, N. , Barron, V. and McHugh, P. (2010) A method to fabricate small features on scaffolds for tissue engineering via selective laser sintering. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 3, 138-147. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2010.32019.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Cancedda, R., Dozin, B., Giannoni, P. and Quarto, R. (2003) Tissue engineering and cell therapy of cartilage and bone. Matrix Biology, 22, 81-91.
[2] Hollister, S.J., Maddox, R.D. and Taboas, J.M. (2002) Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. Biomaterials, 23, 4095-4103.
[3] Holy, C.E., Shoichet, M.S. and Davies, J.E. (2000) Engineering three-dimensional bone tissue in vitro using biodegradable scaffolds: Investigating initial cell-seeding density and culture period. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, 51, 376-382.
[4] Hutmacher, D.W. (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 21, 2529-2543.
[5] Schimandle, J.H. and Boden, S.D. (1997) Bone substitutes for lumbar fusion: Present and future. Operative Te- chniques in Orthopaedics, 7, 60-67.
[6] Bancroft, G.N., Sikavitsas, V.I. and Mikos, A.G. (2003) Technical note: Design of a flow perfusion bioreactor system for bone tissue-engineering applications. Tissue Engineering, 9, 549-554.
[7] Bilodeau, K. and Mantovani, D. (2006) Bioreactors for tissue engineering: Focus on mechanical constraints, a comparative review. Tissue Engineering, 12(8), 2367- 2383.
[8] Yu, X., Botchwey, E.A., Levine, E.M., Pollack, S.R. and Laurencin, C.T. (2004) Bioreactor-based bone tissue engineering: The influence of dynamic flow on osteoblast phenotypic expression and matrix mineralization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 11203-11208.
[9] Adachi, T., Osako, Y., Tanaka, M., Hojo, M. and Hollister, S.J. (2006) Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials, 27, 3964-3972.
[10] Green, D., Walsh, D., Mann, S. and Oreffo, R.O.C. (2002) The potential of biomimesis in bone tissue engineering: Lessons from the design and synthesis of invertebrate skeletons. Bone, 30, 810-815.
[11] Lohfeld, S., Barron, V. and Mchugh, P.E., (2005) Biomodels of bone: A review. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 33, 1295-1311.
[12] Hutmacher, D.W., Sittinger, M. and Risbud, M.V. (2004) Scaffold-based tissue engineering: Rationale for compu- ter-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems. Trends in Biotechnology, 22, 354-362.
[13] Leong, K.F., Cheah, C.M. and Chua, C.K. (2003) Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. Biomaterials, 24, 2363-2378.
[14] Moroni, L., De Wijn, J.R. and Van Blitterswijk, C.A. (2006) 3D fiber-deposited scaffolds for tissue engineering: Influence of pores geometry and architecture on dynamic mechanical properties. Biomaterials, 27, 974-985.
[15] Woesz, A., Rumpler, M., Stampfl, J., Varga, F., Fratzl- Zelman, N., Roschger, P., Klaushofer, K. and Fratzl, P. (2005) Towards bone replacement materials from calcium phosphates via rapid prototyping and ceramic gelcasting. Materials Science and Engineering C, 25, 181- 186.
[16] Tan, K.H., Chua, C.K., Leong, K.F., Cheah, C.M., Cheang, P., Abu Bakar, M.S. and Cha, S.W. (2003) Scaffold development using selective laser sintering of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite biocomposite blends. Bio- materials, 24, 3115-3123.
[17] Yang, S., Leong, K.F., Du, Z. and Chua, C.K. (2002) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part II. Rapid prototyping techniques. Tissue Engineering, 8, 1- 11.
[18] Das, S., Hollister, S.J., Flanagan, C., Adewunmi, A., Bark, K., Chen, C., Ramaswamy, K., Rose, D. and Widjaja, E. (2003) Freeform fabrication of nylon-6 tissue engineering scaffolds. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 9, 43-49.
[19] Partee, B., Hollister, S.J. and Das, S. (2006) Selective la- ser sintering process optimization for layered manufacturing of CAPA 6501 polycaprolactone bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 128, 531-540.
[20] L. Liulan, H. Qingxi, H. Xianxu, and X. Gaochun, (2007) Design and fabrication of bone tissue engineering scaffolds via rapid prototyping and CAD. Journal of Rare Earths, 25(2), 379-383.
[21] Williams, J.M., Adewunmi, A., Schek, R.M., Flanagan, C. L., Krebsbach, P.H., Feinberg, S.E., Hollister, S. J. and Das, S. (2005) Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials, 26, 4817-4827.
[22] Smith, M.H., Flanagan, C.L., Kemppainen, J.M., Sack, J. A., Chung, H., Das, S., Hollister, S.J. and Feinberg, S.E. (2007) Computed tomography-based tissue-engineered scaffolds in craniomaxillofacial surgery. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 3, 207-216.
[23] Wiria, F.E., Leong, K.F., Chua, C.K. and Liu, Y. (2007) Poly-[epsilon]-caprolactone/hydroxyapatite for tissue en- gineering scaffold fabrication via selective laser sintering. Acta Biomaterialia, 3, 1-12.
[24] Caulfield, B., Mchugh, P.E. and Lohfeld, S. (2007) Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide components on build parameters in the SLS process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 182, 477-488.
[25] An, Y.H. (1999) Mechanical properties of bone, in An, Y. H. & Draughn, R.A. Editions. Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 41–64.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.