Evaluation of Some Selected Metals in Rice Cultivated in Four Local Government Areas in Enugu State, Nigeria ()
Affiliation(s)
1Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria.
2Department of Zoology and Environmental Biology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
3Opec Research Consult, Awka, Nigeria.
4Chemistry Department, Dillard University New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
ABSTRACT
In this study, we investigated the presence of Zn, Fe, Cu, and Ca in rice
cultivated in four local government areas (Nkanu East, Aninri, Uzo Uwani, Isi
Uzo) within Enugu state, Nigeria. We employed an Atomic Absorption Spectrometer
with an air acetylene flame to analyze these metals after digesting the rice
samples. Risk assessment studies were carried out to determine any potential
health risk to consumers by evaluating the estimated daily intake (EDI), the
target hazard quotient (THQ) and hazard index (HI). The average concentration
(mg/kg) of trace metals in the rice samples was within the acceptable limits
established by FAO/WHO. Specifically, Zn ranged from 0.265 to 0.632 mg/kg, Fe
from 2.73 to 4.131 mg/kg, Cu from 0.205 to 4.131 mg/kg, and Ca from 9.718 to
12.150 mg/kg. There were no statistically significant differences in metal
concentrations among the various locations. Consequently, the rice analyzed in
this study can be considered safe for consumption. The calculated EDI
(mg/kg-day) values were below the maximum tolerable daily intake thresholds.
THQ values also fell within safe levels, and the HI values were less than 1,
signifying no potential health risks associated with consuming rice from these
locations. In conclusion, there is no significant non-carcinogenic health risk associated with exposure to trace metals
through the consumption of rice from these areas.
Share and Cite:
Alisa, C. , Nwobodo, S. , Alisa, E. , Okeke, P. , Bilar, A. , Doyle, J. and Agwaramgbo, L. (2023) Evaluation of Some Selected Metals in Rice Cultivated in Four Local Government Areas in Enugu State, Nigeria.
Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection,
11, 141-150. doi:
10.4236/gep.2023.1111011.
Cited by
No relevant information.