Journal of Software Engineering and Applications

Volume 2, Issue 3 (October 2009)

ISSN Print: 1945-3116   ISSN Online: 1945-3124

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.22  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

An Exploratory Case Study in Designing and Implementing Tight Versus Loose Frameworks

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 348KB)  PP. 209-220  
DOI: 10.4236/jsea.2009.23029    6,191 Downloads   10,145 Views  Citations

Affiliation(s)

.

ABSTRACT

Frameworks provide large scale reuse by providing skeleton structure of similar applications. But the generality, that a framework may have, makes it fairly complex, hard to understand and thus to reuse. Frameworks have been classified according to many criteria. This paper proposes two types of framework (based on the concept of ‘generality’) named as: tight framework and loose framework. A case study is done by developing loose and tight frameworks for the appli-cation sets of Environment for Unit testing (EUT) domain. Based on the experience that we got by during this case study, we tried to find out the benefits of one (tight or loose) framework over the other. This work attempts to provide an initial background for meaningful studies related to the concept of ‘Design and Development of Framework’.

Share and Cite:

M. GUPTA, R. GUPTA and A. TRIPATHI, "An Exploratory Case Study in Designing and Implementing Tight Versus Loose Frameworks," Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, Vol. 2 No. 3, 2009, pp. 209-220. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2009.23029.

Cited by

[1] The Effect of Applying Design of Experiments Techniques to Software Performance Testing
Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies, 2015
[2] Report from the second international workshop on games and software engineering (GAS 2012)
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2012
[3] Effect of variability of a framework upon its testing effort: An empirical evaluation
Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology (ICCIT), 2010 5th International Conference on. IEEE, 2010

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.