Open Journal of Statistics

Volume 6, Issue 6 (December 2016)

ISSN Print: 2161-718X   ISSN Online: 2161-7198

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.53  Citations  

Improving Disease Prevalence Estimates Using Missing Data Techniques

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 351KB)  PP. 1110-1122  
DOI: 10.4236/ojs.2016.66090    1,360 Downloads   2,765 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of a disease in a population is defined as the proportion of people who are infected. Selection bias in disease prevalence estimates occurs if non-participation in testing is correlated with disease status. Missing data are commonly encountered in most medical research. Unfortunately, they are often neglected or not properly handled during analytic procedures, and this may substantially bias the results of the study, reduce the study power, and lead to invalid conclusions. The goal of this study is to illustrate how to estimate prevalence in the presence of missing data. We consider a case where the variable of interest (response variable) is binary and some of the observations are missing and assume that all the covariates are fully observed. In most cases, the statistic of interest, when faced with binary data is the prevalence. We develop a two stage approach to improve the prevalence estimates; in the first stage, we use the logistic regression model to predict the missing binary observations and then in the second stage we recalculate the prevalence using the observed data and the imputed missing data. Such a model would be of great interest in research studies involving HIV/AIDS in which people usually refuse to donate blood for testing yet they are willing to provide other covariates. The prevalence estimation method is illustrated using simulated data and applied to HIV/AIDS data from the Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey, 2007.

Share and Cite:

Seck, E. , Oscar, N. and Diongue, A. (2016) Improving Disease Prevalence Estimates Using Missing Data Techniques. Open Journal of Statistics, 6, 1110-1122. doi: 10.4236/ojs.2016.66090.

Cited by

[1] Missing Data and Systematic Bias
American journal of public health, 2017

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.