Applied Mathematics

Volume 7, Issue 9 (May 2016)

ISSN Print: 2152-7385   ISSN Online: 2152-7393

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.58  Citations  

Proximal Methods for Elliptic Optimal Control Problems with Sparsity Cost Functional

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 811KB)  PP. 967-992  
DOI: 10.4236/am.2016.79086    1,918 Downloads   3,079 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

First-order proximal methods that solve linear and bilinear elliptic optimal control problems with a sparsity cost functional are discussed. In particular, fast convergence of these methods is proved. For benchmarking purposes, inexact proximal schemes are compared to an inexact semismooth Newton method. Results of numerical experiments are presented to demonstrate the computational effectiveness of proximal schemes applied to infinite-dimensional elliptic optimal control problems and to validate the theoretical estimates.

Share and Cite:

Schindele, A. and Borzì, A. (2016) Proximal Methods for Elliptic Optimal Control Problems with Sparsity Cost Functional. Applied Mathematics, 7, 967-992. doi: 10.4236/am.2016.79086.

Cited by

[1] Smoothing analysis of two robust multigrid methods for elliptic optimal control problems
arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.13066, 2022
[2] On Some Problems in Sparse Hybrid Imaging, Non-Standard Finite Difference Methods, and Fokker-Planck Frameworks in Esophageal Cancer
2022
[3] ERROR ESTIMATES FOR SPARSE OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEMS BY PIECEWISE LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATION.
2021
[4] On fast convergence rates for generalized conditional gradient methods with backtracking stepsize
arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.15217, 2021
[5] Mesh Independence of a Majorized ABCD Method for Sparse PDE-constrained Optimization Problems
2020
[6] A sparsity-based Fokker-Planck optimal control framework for modeling traffic flows
2020
[7] On sparse sensor placement for parameter identification problems with partial differential equations
2019
[8] Sparse reconstruction of log-conductivity in current density impedance tomography
2019
[9] A numerical solver for the Fokker-Planck optimal control of stochastic jump-diffusion processes
2018
[10] A New Optimization Approach to Sparse Reconstruction of Log-Conductivity in Acousto-Electric Tomography
2018
[11] EFFICIENT DUALITY-BASED NUMERICAL METHODS FOR SPARSE PARABOLIC OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEMS
2018
[12] An FE-dABCD algorithm for elliptic optimal control problems with constraints on the gradient of the state and control
2018
[13] An FE-Inexact Heterogeneous ADMM for Elliptic Optimal Control Problems with L1-Control Cost
2018
[14] An efficient duality-based approach for PDE-constrained sparse optimization
Computational Optimization and Applications, 2018
[15] Mesh Independence of an Accelerated Block Coordinate Descent Method for Sparse Optimal Control Problems
2017
[16] Primal-dual extragradient methods for nonlinear nonsmooth PDE-constrained optimization
2017
[17] Theoretical and numerical analysis of Fokker-Planck optimal control problems for jump-diffusion processes
2017
[18] A FE-inexact heterogeneous ADMM for Elliptic Optimal Control Problems with {}-Control Cost
2017
[19] Error estimates for sparse optimal control problems by piecewise linear finite element approximation
2017
[20] A Fokker-Planck Based Approach to Control Jump Processes
Novel Methods in Computational Finance, 2017
[21] Proximal methods in medical image reconstruction and in nonsmooth optimal control of partial differential equations
2016
[22] On Optimal Sparse-Control Problems Governed by Jump-Diffusion Processes
Applied Mathematics, 2016
[23] A FE-ADMM algorithm for Lavrentiev-regularized state-constrained elliptic control problem
2016
[24] Proximal schemes for parabolic optimal control problems with sparsity promoting cost functionals
Synthetic Communications, 2016

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.