Open Journal of Urology

Volume 1, Issue 2 (May 2011)

ISSN Print: 2160-5440   ISSN Online: 2160-5629

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.22  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Cadaveric Assessment of Synthetic Mid-Urethral Sling Placement

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 216KB)  PP. 19-24  
DOI: 10.4236/oju.2011.12006    6,376 Downloads   11,432 Views  Citations




Purpose: To determine if 3 types of mid-urethral synthetic slings are visually the same. Materials and Methods: A retropubic, obturator, and single incision sling was individually placed in three cadavers. Tension was set using a spacer (obturator and retropubic). Single incision sling (SIS) tension was set by visual inspection. Thirty physicians were asked to determine placement method, tension, and location of the 3 slings. Results: Physicians were composed of 5 urologists, 7 urogynecologist, and 18 general gynecologists, with an average of 53 slings performed per year. Conclusion: This study showed that after placement of a sling it is hard to tell how the sling was placed and that most physicians felt the SIS was tensioned the best and most likely at the mid-urethra.

Share and Cite:

S. Serels, "Cadaveric Assessment of Synthetic Mid-Urethral Sling Placement," Open Journal of Urology, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2011, pp. 19-24. doi: 10.4236/oju.2011.12006.

Cited by

[1] Single incision slings: Past, present, and future
World Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.