Open Journal of Philosophy

Volume 4, Issue 3 (August 2014)

ISSN Print: 2163-9434   ISSN Online: 2163-9442

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.60  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Max Weber’s Methodology: The Method of Falsification Applied to Text Interpretations

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 2591KB)  PP. 345-359  
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.43038    8,043 Downloads   9,003 Views  


Text interpretations are usually leading to ambiguous results. This is especially the case for the interpretation of Max Weber’s methodology. I discuss Thomas Burger’s interpretation that Weber applied Rickert’s methodology and that he never developed his own standpoint regarding the methodological problems. In contrast to this view, I propose an alternative interpretation based on the Methodenstreitin economics and the philosophies of Kant and Rickert. In my opinion Weber offered a very unique solution to an old philosophical problem, which resulted in a complete break with the Platonic and Aristotelian tradition. His solution is what I call the postulate of internal consistency (a logical consistent application of an arbitrary scheme of interpretation). I will use Popper’s method of deductive falsification to decide if Burger’s or my interpretation produces fewer contradictions.

Share and Cite:

Etzrodt, C. (2014) Max Weber’s Methodology: The Method of Falsification Applied to Text Interpretations. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4, 345-359. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2014.43038.

Cited by

No relevant information.

Copyright © 2021 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.