Open Journal of Composite Materials

Volume 4, Issue 2 (April 2014)

ISSN Print: 2164-5612   ISSN Online: 2164-5655

Google-based Impact Factor: 1.5  Citations  

Comparative Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill Resins

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 333KB)  PP. 117-121  
DOI: 10.4236/ojcm.2014.42013    8,978 Downloads   15,448 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the flexural and compressive strengths of a new sonicactivated bulk-fill system (Sonicfill) with other bulk-fill resins and a universal posterior composite resin. Materials and Methods: A low-stress flowable base resin material (SDR), a bulk-fill composite resin (Tetric Evo Ceram), a universal posterior composite (GC G-aenial), and the Sonicfill system were compared. The specimens were prepared for each group following ISO Standard 4049 (flexural strength) and ADA 27 specifications (compressive strength). One-way variance analysis and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine the statistical differences among groups (p < 0.05). Results: The Sonicfill system presented significantly higher compressive strength than other groups (p < 0.001). For flexural strength results, although the Sonicfill system showed the highest values, no statistically significant differences were determined among all groups (p > 0.001). Conclusion: Due to the ability to place restorations with single increment and ease of use, the Sonicfill system can be an alternative for posterior restorations.

Share and Cite:

Didem, A. , Gözde, Y. and Nurhan, Ö. (2014) Comparative Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill Resins. Open Journal of Composite Materials, 4, 117-121. doi: 10.4236/ojcm.2014.42013.

Cited by

[1] In Vitro Evaluation of the Strength of Dentin Replacement in Complex Posterior Tooth Restoration
Applied Sciences, 2022
[2] Development of Biomimetic Hydroxyapatite Containing Dental Restorative Composites
Arabian Journal for …, 2022
[3] Fracture Resistance of Root-Canal Treated Premolars Restored with Dentin Replacement Materials: An In-vitro Study
Oral Health & …, 2022
[4] Evaluation and Comparison of Physical Properties of Cention N with Other Restorative Materials in Artificial Saliva: An In Vitro Study
International Journal of …, 2022
[5] BULK FİLL KOMPOZİT REZİN RESTORATİF MATERYALLER
Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi …, 2022
[6] Bulk Fill Kompozit Rezinlerin İki Farklı Tabaka Kalınlığında ve Işık Gücünde Polimerize Edilmesinin Kompozitin Basma Dayanımına Etkisi
European Journal of …, 2021
[7] Comparación de la resistencia a la compresión entre una resina compuesta y dos resinas de tipo bulk fill, in vitro
2021
[8] Clinical performance of Bulk-Fill resin composite restorations using the United States Public Health Service and Federation Dentaire Internationale Criteria: a …
European Journal of …, 2021
[9] In-vitro Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Depth of Cure of Bulkfill Composite
RGUHS Journal of Dental …, 2021
[10] To evaluate fracture resistance of class II mod cavities restored with close sandwich technique using different base materials-An in vitro study
Baba Farid University …, 2021
[11] Two Years Clinical Evaluation of Sonic-Resin Placement System with Self-Etch and Total-Etch Adhesive Modes
J Res in Med Sci, 2021
[12] Mechanical and Optical Properties of the Experimental and Commercial Dental Composites: A Systematic Review
2021
[13] دراسة مخبرية مقارنة لتحري مقاومة الانضغاط لبعض الراتنجات المركَبة الكتلية والتقليدية‎
2021
[14] Bulk-Fill Kompozit Rezinler
Necmettin Erbakan üniversitesi Di? Hekimli?i Dergisi, 2020
[15] Influence of Oscillating Packing Instrument on Microhardness of Bulk-Fill Composite: In Vitro Study
2020
[16] One Year Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk Fill Restorative Resins in Class-I Restorations.
2020
[17] Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using the United States Public Health Service and Federation Dentaire Internationale …
2020
[18] Resina bulk fill: estado actual
2020
[19] К вопросу о композитных материалах
2020
[20] Современные пломбировочные материалы в терапевтической стоматологии
2020
[21] Aus der Poliklinik für Parodontologie und Zahnerhaltung der Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
2020
[22] Microtensile Bond Strength of Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorations in High C-factor Cavities
2020
[23] Fracture resistance of premolars restored with bulk fill resin composite versus incrementally packed resin composite: In Vitro study
2020
[24] Knowledge, Awareness and Perception Of Cention Being Used As A Replacement For Amalgam Restoration
2020
[25] One Year Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk Fill Restorative Resins in Class-I Restorations
2020
[26] Microfiltración en las Resinas Compuestas de Relleno Masivo y Nanohíbridas Universales. Revisión Sistemática
2020
[27] RESINA BULK FILL E MATRIZ UNIVERSAL: relato de caso realizado na Faculdade Patos de Minas
2020
[28] Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using the United States Public Health Service and Federation Dentaire Internationale Criteria: A 12 …
2020
[29] Effect of food-simulating solvents on flexural properties of bulk-fill resin composites
2020
[30] On the issue of composite materials
2020
[31] Comparison of depth of cure sonic-activated bulk-fill composite, low viscosity, and high viscosity in different thickness
2020
[32] Cuspal Deflection and Temperature Rise of MOD Cavities Restored through the Bulk-Fill and Incremental Layering Techniques Using Flowable and Packable Bulk-Fill …
2020
[33] Diş hekimliğinde bulk fill kompozit rezinler
Selcuk Dental Journal, 2019
[34] " Bulk" kompozitni materijali
2019
[35] COMPARISON OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF TEETH RESTORED WITH MICROHYBRID, FIBER REINFORCED AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE RESINS …
2019
[36] Mechanical properties of bulk-fill versus nanohybrid composites: Effect of layer thickness and application protocols [Propriedades mecânicas de compósitos de resina …
2019
[37] Bulk-fill 복합레진, 믿고 사용해도 될까?
2019
[38] COMPARISON OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF TEETH RESTORED WITH MICROHYBRID, FIBER REINFORCED AND NANOHYBRID COMPOSITE …
2019
[39] Fracture Resistance of a Bulk-Fill and a Conventional Composite and the Combination of Both for Coronal Restoration of Severely Damaged Primary Anterior …
2019
[40] DENTAL LEARNING
2019
[41] Mechanical properties of bulk-fill versus nanohybrid composites: effect of layer thickness and application protocols
2019
[42] LES COMPOSITES EN MONOCOUCHE OU BULK-FILL
2019
[43] Bulk-fil 복합레진, 믿고 사용해도 될까?
2019
[44] Evaluation of the efficiency of polymerization of composite resins in proximal restorations
Thesis, 2019
[45] Bulk-Fill kompozit rezinlerin yüzey özelliklerinin ve bakteriyel adezyonun incelenmesi
2019
[46] Микропропустливоста и јачината на врската кај композитните материјали со примена на различни техники на апликација
2019
[47] Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with microhybrid, fiber reinforced and nanohybrid composite resins an in-vitro study
Int J Recent Sci Res, 2019
[48] Perbedaan Kekuatan Lentur Bahan Restorasi Resin Komposit Nanohybrid Dengan Resin Komposit Fiber
2018
[49] Bulk Fill Kompozit Rezinlerin Mikrosertlik Değeri ve Dönüşüm Derecesinin İn Vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi
2018
[50] Compressive Strength of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Nano-hybrid Composite Resins: An in Vitro Study
Journal of Dental School, Shahid Beheshti …, 2018
[51] FACULTAD DE ODONTOLOGÍA
2018
[52] Bulk-fill kompozitni restaurativni materijali
2018
[53] Resistencia compresiva de tres resinas compuestas indicadas para restauración posterior, In Vitro, Lima 2018
2018
[54] Section CNU 56: Développement, Croissance et Prévention
2018
[55] Comparative Evaluation of Depth of Cure of Three High Viscosity Bulk Fill Composites versus Conventional Composite: An In Vitro Study
2018
[56] Comparative evaluation of microleakage of G-aenial Universal Flo, Smart Dentin Replacement and Tetric Evo Ceram bulk fill resin composite restorations in class v cavity preparation: an in-vitro study
International Dental Journal of Student's Research, 2018
[57] Fracture Resistance Evaluation of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins with Total-Etch and Self-Etch Adhesives in Class II Restorations
2018
[58] بررسی مقاومت به شکست کامپوزیت رزینهای bulk-fill با ادهزیوهای توتال اچ و سلف اچ در ترمیمهای کلاس دو‎
2018
[59] Pengaruh Penambahan Kitosan Terhadap Compressive Strength Semen Ionomer Kaca Modifikasi Resin
2018
[60] Diametral Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength, and Surface Microhardness of Bioactive Bulk Fill Restorative
2018
[61] Fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth reinforced with different composites after root-end closure
2018
[62] Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Oral Investigations, 2018
[63] Comparative evaluation of microleakage of G-aenial Universal Flo, Smart Dentin Replacement and Tetric Evo Ceram bulk fill resin composite restorations in class v
INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL OF STUDENTS RESEARCH, 2018
[64] NOVA GERAÇÃO DE RESINAS COMPOSTAS BULK-FILL
2018
[65] Perbedaan Ketahanan Fraktur Bahan Restorasi Nanohybrid Resin Composite Dengan Fiber Reinforced Composite (FRC)
2018
[66] CLINICAL EVALUATION OF OSCILLATION METHOD FOR APPLICATION OF A PACKABLE COMPOSITE RESIN
2018
[67] L'orthodontie en omnipratique: traitements interceptifs
2018
[68] RESINAS COMPOSTAS DO TIPO BULK FILL: INTRODU??O, VANTAGENS, DESVANTAGENS E USO CLíNICO
2018
[69] In vitro comparison of flexural strength of Cention-N, Bulk-fill composites, light-cure nanocomposites and resin-modified glass ionomer cement
2018
[70] Micro-CT Evaluation Of Adaptation At Tooth/Restoration Interface Using Three Resin Composite Restorations Placed With Different Filling Techniques
E.D.J., 2018
[71] Flexural strength and depth of cure of Sonic Fill resin composite
2018
[72] NOVA GERAÇÃO DE RESINAS COMPOSTAS BULK-FILL: REVISÃO DE LITERATURA
2018
[73] Peut-on utiliser les composites Bulk Fill et les composites Dual dans l'indication de la remontée de marge
2018
[74] In vitro comparison of flexural strength of cention-n, bulkFill composites, light-cure nanocomposites and resin-modified glass ionomer cement
2018
[75] Perbedaan Kebocoran Mikro Tumpatan Resin Komposit Nanohybrid Dan Nanofiller Pada Bahan Home Bleaching Karbamid Peroksida 10%
2017
[76] FLEXURAL STRENGTH EVALUATION OF TETRIC EVOCERAM BULK-FILL COMPOSITE IN COMPARISON WITH TRADITIONAL COMPOSITES
2017
[77] An in-vitro evaluation of the physical properties of a new bulk-fill composite
2017
[78] Comparación de la resistencia compresiva de resinas convencionales vs resinas tipo bulk fill
2017
[79] COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF FLEXURAL AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHS OF BULK-FILL COMPOSITES
2017
[80] Depth of Cure and Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill Posterior Dental Composites
2017
[81] Assessment of mandibular third molar position by using computed tomography and reconstructed lateral radiograph
2017
[82] Effect of Different Beverages on the Physical Properties of Sonicfill Dental Composite
2017
[83] A Novel Sonicfill Composite System used for Bulk Fill Posterior Restorations
International Journal of Oral Health and Medical Research, 2017
[84] Two-year clinical performance of sonic-resin placement system in posterior restorations.
Quintessence International, 2017
[85] The Effect of Different Light Cure Systems on Microhardness of Bulk Fill Composite Materials
2017
[86] The effect of curing intensity on mechanical properties of different bulk-fill composite resins
Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2017
[87] Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review
British Dental Journal, 2017
[88] Comparative evaluation of compressive strength of conventional resins vs Bulk fill composites
2017
[89] A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF FLOWABLE COMPOSITE AND A CORE
2016
[90] Resistencia a la fractura de endoposte de fibra de vidrio-muñón y reconstrucción con resina sonicfill en espacio intraconducto-muñón en dientes tratados …
2016
[91] Variação da temperatura durante a fotopolimerização de novas resinas bulk-fill
2016
[92] 3 种大块充填树脂的耐磨耗性能及挠曲强度的比较研究
2016
[93] KEKUATAN TEKAN RESIN KOMPOSIT MICROHYBRID DENGAN PENAMBAHAN LAPISAN POLYETHYLENE FIBER
2016
[94] Posterior composites: update on cavities and filling techniques
Journal of Dentistry, 2016
[95] COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE FRACTURE RESISTANCE
2016
[96] Relative Microhardness and Flexural Strength of Different Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorative Materials
Journal of American Science, 2015
[97] Development of Fiberglass Woven Roving Composite as an Alternative Material for the Hull of Fishing Boat
2015
[98] The Story on Bulk-fill resin composites.
2014
[99] Effect of Light Curing Distance on Top To Bottom Microhardness of Bulkfill Composite
[100] Comparative evaluation of microleakage of G-aenial Universal Flo, Smart Dentin Replacement and Tetric Evo Ceram bulk fill resin composite restorations in …
[101] BAŞLIK SAYFASI
Doç
[102] Sınıf I kavitelerde dört farklı bulk-fill rezin kompozitin dentine mikrogerilim bağlanma dayanımlarının incelenmesi
[103] Farklı aşındırma sistemleri ve ortamların bulk-fill kompozitlerin yüzey özelliklerine etkisi

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.