International Journal of Clinical Medicine

Volume 5, Issue 5 (March 2014)

ISSN Print: 2158-284X   ISSN Online: 2158-2882

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.52  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Does Coronary Endarterectomy Increase Early Mortality and Morbidity Compared with Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Alone-Single Centre Experience

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 513KB)  PP. 197-205  
DOI: 10.4236/ijcm.2014.55033    4,045 Downloads   6,266 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

Background: With increasing incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in Saudi Arabia and its fatal co-morbidity, this has resulted in a more complex pool of cases referred to cardiac surgeons. In selected cases, achieving optimal revascularization of diffuse CAD necessitates adjunctive techniques such as coronary endarterectomy (CE). The aim of our study is to evaluate the early mortality and post-operative morbidity related to CE. Method: Retrospective study from Jan 2009 to Dec 2010. Inclusion of 186 patients: 38 patients had CABG with CE and 148 patients had CABG alone. Results: Pre-operative percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was higher in the CE with CABG group (25.8%) compared with CABG alone (8.9%) (p = 0.009). Intra-operative data showed a higher mean cardiopulmonary bypass time (CBT) of 160 minutes and a mean cross-clamp time (XCT) of 109 minutes in the CE with CABG, compared to a mean CBT of 129 minutes and a mean XCT of 87 minutes in the CABG alone group (p = 0.001). The most common vessel endarterectomized was left anterior descending artery (LAD) (47%) followed by right coronary artery (RCA) (22%). Post-operatively, the mortality amongst the CE with CABG group (7.9%) was higher than CABG only group (1.4%), however it wasn’t statistically significant (p = 0.06). With regards to morbidity, hemodynamic instability requiring intra aortic balloon pump (HIR-IABP) was higher in the CE with CABG group (10.5%) compared to the CABG only group (1.4%) (p = 0.018). Conclusion: Our study showed that CE when combined with CABG wasn’t associated with a higher mortality rate when compared with CABG alone.

Share and Cite:

Alreshidan, M. , Albabtain, M. , Obied, H. , Alassal, M. , Albaradai, A. and Alghofaili, F. (2014) Does Coronary Endarterectomy Increase Early Mortality and Morbidity Compared with Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Alone-Single Centre Experience. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 5, 197-205. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2014.55033.

Cited by

[1] Association of cardiac enzymes with morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing coronary endarterectomy surgery
ARYA …, 2021
[2] EARLY MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT WITH AND WITHOUT CORONARY …
Pakistan Armed …, 2021
[3] Long-term outcomes of coronary endarterectomy and prolonged segmental reconstruction in diffuse coronary atherosclerosis
Kardiologija i serdechno …, 2020
[4] Отдаленные результаты реконструктивных процедур на коронарных артериях с эндартерэктомией или без нее при диффузном коронарном атеросклерозе.
2020
[5] Analysis of survival after coronary endarterectomy combined with coronary artery bypass grafting compared with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta …
2019
[6] Impact of risk factors and surgical techniques in coronary endarterectomy: a network meta-analysis
2019
[7] НЕПОСРЕДСТВЕННЫЕ РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ХИРУРГИЧЕСКОГО ЛЕЧЕНИЯ ИШЕМИЧЕСКОЙ БОЛЕЗНИ СЕРДЦА У ПАЦИЕНТОВ С ДИФФУЗНЫМ …
2018
[8] Непосредственные результаты хирургического лечения ишемической болезни сердца у пациентов с диффузным поражением коронарного русла
2018
[9] REVIEW ON CORONARY ENDARTERECTOMY-PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE!
International Journal of Current Innovation Research, 2017
[10] A Systemic Review on Coronary Endarterectomy in Ischemic Heart Disease
Chest Heart Journal, 2017
[11] Review on coronary endarterectomy-past, present, and future
2017
[12] Endarterectomia de la arteria desecendente anterior con techo extendido de mamaria
XXV CONGRESO DOMINICANO DE CARDIOLOGÍA, 2015

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.