Author(s)

Rolando Lastra, William Petruk

NRCan-CANMET Mining, Ottawa, Canada.

Mineralogical characterization applied to mineral processing is now widespread. The first step for a mineralogi- cal characterization study is usually size fractionation. Preparation of polished sections is done on size fractions to reduce complications in making representative cross sections of particles with large size differences. A sample is commonly fractionated into five or six size intervals. The drawback of this procedure is that it makes liberation studies more expensive, because one sample actually produces five or six sub-samples that need to be studied, i.e. one from each size interval. Thus to reduce cost of liberation studies, it would be desirable to study the un-sized sample. This paper provides a comparative liberation study of a set of samples both using size fractions and using the un-sized samples. The samples studied are the feed, the concentrate and the tails of a lead rougher flotation circuit. The results consistently show significant differences between the sized and the un-sized samples. Nevertheless, the results indicate that un-corrected liberation data from un-sized samples can be used for comparative studies that involve several related samples. Thus, it is possible to improve (or further understand) a concentrator circuit by using mineralogical data from un-sized samples around such circuit.

Mineral; Liberation; Sieved; Un-Sieved

Lastra, R. and Petruk, W. (2014) Mineralogical Characterization of Sieved and Un-Sieved Samples. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 2, 40-48. doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2014.21007.