Journal of Modern Physics

Volume 3, Issue 10 (October 2012)

ISSN Print: 2153-1196   ISSN Online: 2153-120X

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.86  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Analysis of the Low-Energy π±p Elastic-Scattering Data

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 626KB)  PP. 1369-1387  
DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2012.310174    3,193 Downloads   5,039 Views  Citations
Author(s)

ABSTRACT

We report the results of a phase-shift analysis (PSA) of the low-energy π±p elastic-scattering data. Following the method which we had set forth in our previous PSA [1], we first investigate the self-consistency of the low-energy π±p elastic-scattering databases, via two separate analyses of (first) the π+p and (subsequently) the π-p elastic-scattering data. There are two main differences to our previous PSA: 1) we now perform only one test for the acceptance of each data set (based on its contribution to the overall 2) and 2) we adopt a more stringent acceptance criterion in the statistical tests. We show that it is possible to obtain self-consistent databases after removing a very small amount of the data (4.57% of the initial database). We subsequently fit the ETH model [38] to the truncatedπ±p elastic-scattering databases. The model-parameter values show reasonable stability when subjected to different criteria for the rejection of single data points and entire data sets. Our result for the pseudovector πNN coupling constant is 0.0726±0.0014. We extract the scattering lengths and volumes, as well as the s- and p-wave hadronic phase shifts up to T = 100 MeV. Large differences in the s-wave part of the interaction can be seen when comparing our hadronic phase shifts with the current SAID solution (WI08); there is general agreement in the p waves, save for the ~1/21- hadronic phase shift.

Share and Cite:

E. Matsinos and G. Rasche, "Analysis of the Low-Energy π±p Elastic-Scattering Data," Journal of Modern Physics, Vol. 3 No. 10, 2012, pp. 1369-1387. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2012.310174.

Cited by

[1] Redetermination of the strong-interaction width in pionic hydrogen
2021
[2] A brief history of the pion-nucleon coupling constant
2019
[3] Update of the phase-shift analysis of the low-energy $\pi N $ data
2017
[4] Systematic effects in the low-energy behavior of the current SAID solution for the pion-nucleon system
International Journal of Modern Physics E, 2017
[5] Systematic effects in the low-energy behaviour of the current SAID solution for the pion-nucleon system
2016
[6] New analysis of the low-energy $\ pi^\ pm p $ differential cross sections of the CHAOS Collaboration
2015
[7] New analysis of the low-energy π±p differential cross-sections of the CHAOS Collaboration
International Journal of Modern Physics E, 2015
[8] Hadronic shift in pionic hydrogen
The European Physical Journal A, 2014
[9] Aspects of the ETH model of the pion–nucleon interaction
Nuclear Physics A, 2014
[10] Evaluation of the pion–nucleon sigma term from CHAOS data
Physics Letters B, 2013
[11] Analysis of the low-energy π±p differential cross sections of the CHAOS Collaboration
Nuclear Physics A, 2013
[12] ANALYSIS OF THE LOW-ENERGY π-p CHARGE-EXCHANGE DATA
International Journal of Modern Physics A, 2013
[13] Comment on" Evaluation of the Pion-Nucleon Sigma Term from CHAOS Data"
arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.3469, 2013
[14] Analysis of the low-energy $\ pi^-p $ charge-exchange data
arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.3856, 2012
[15] Analysis of the DENZ04 low-energy π±p elastic-scattering data
arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.3635, 2012
[16] Analysis of the DENZ04 low-energy π±p elasticscattering data
2012

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.