Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering

Volume 3, Issue 1 (January 2010)

ISSN Print: 1937-6871   ISSN Online: 1937-688X

Google-based Impact Factor: 0.66  Citations  h5-index & Ranking

Identifying predictive markers of chemosensitivity of breast cancer with random forests

HTML  Download Download as PDF (Size: 463KB)  PP. 59-64  
DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2010.31009    7,719 Downloads   12,145 Views  Citations
Author(s)

Affiliation(s)

.

ABSTRACT

Several gene signatures have been identified to build predictors of chemosensitivity for breast cancer. It is crucial to understand how each gene in a signature contributes to the prediction, i.e., to make the prediction model interpretable instead of using it as a black box. We utilized Random Forests (RFs) to build two interpretable predictors of pathologic complete response (pCR) based on two gene signatures. One signature consisted of the top 31 probe sets (27 genes) differentially expressed between pCR and residual disease (RD) chosen from a previous study, and the other consisted of the genes involved in Notch singling pathway (113 genes). Both predictors had a higher accuracy (82% v 76% & 79% v 76%), a higher specificity (91% v 71% & 98% v 71%), and a higher positive predictive value (PPV) (68% v 52% & 73% v 52%)) than the predictor in the previous study. Furthermore, Random Forests were employed to calculate the importance of each gene in the two signatures. Findings of our functional annotation suggested that the important genes identified by the feature selection scheme of Random Forests are of biological significance.

Share and Cite:

Hu, W. (2010) Identifying predictive markers of chemosensitivity of breast cancer with random forests. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 3, 59-64. doi: 10.4236/jbise.2010.31009.

Cited by

[1] ECG-Based Subject Identification Using Statistical Features and Random Forest
2019
[2] Predicting Credit Risk at Application Stage
2019
[3] Application of visible and near-infrared spectroscopy for evaluation of ewes milk with different feeds
2018
[4] Random forest: A review
2017
[5] Towards understanding the breast cancer epigenome: a comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data
Oncotarget, 2016
[6] Random Forests: From Early Developments to Recent Advancements
Systems Science & Control Engineering: An Open Access Journal, 2014
[7] Systems Biology: Knowledge Discovery and Reverse Engineering
2012
[8] Urban Image Classification Using Multi-Angle Very-High Resolution Satellite Data
2012
[9] Novel host markers in the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza A virus
Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 2010
[10] Nucleotide host markers in the influenza a viruses
Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 2010
[11] Subtle differences in receptor binding specificity and gene sequences of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus
Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 2010
[12] Host markers and correlated mutations in the overlapping genes of influenza viruses: M1, M2; NS1, NS2; and PB1, PB1-F2
Natural Science, 2010

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.