Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology

Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology

ISSN Print: 2380-4327
ISSN Online: 2380-4335
www.scirp.org/journal/jhepgc
E-mail: jhepgc@scirp.org
"Physical Significance of Measure"
written by Jody A. Geiger,
published by Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, Vol.6 No.1, 2020
has been cited by the following article(s):
  • Google Scholar
  • CrossRef
[1] Measurement Quantization
International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern …, 2022
[2] Properties of Atoms Shown to be a Function of Discrete Geometry
2021
[3] Effective Mass of a Galaxy, Star Velocity and their Relation
2021
[4] Discrete Approach to Star Velocities Solves Dark Matter
2021
[5] Describing Coulomb’s Constant Using Only Planck Units
2021
[6] Elementary Charge
2021
[7] Kinetic Energy
2021
[8] Describing the Magnetic Constant Using Only Planck Units
2021
[9] Diameter & Age of the Universe as a Function of the CMB Temperature
2021
[10] Electric Constant
2021
[11] Physical Significance of Gravitational Curvature and the Orbital Path of Stars
2021
[12] Increasing Universal Mass
2021
[13] Physical Support for a Universe with a Constant Rate of Radial Expansion
2021
[14] Angular Measure & Momentum
2021
[15] Physically Significant Approach to Describing Broken Symmetry
2021
[16] Planck's Constant
2021
[17] Extending the Physical Constants to 12 Significant Digits
2021
[18] Time Dilation of the CMB Age Confirms 363,309 Year Quantum Epoch
2021
[19] Measurement Quantization Describes the Physical Constants
2021
[20] Distance Associated with Charge Couplings
2021
[21] Unifying Gravity with Electromagnetism G= 2πɛ0γ
2021
[22] Describing the Fine Structure Constant Using Only Planck Units
2021
[23] Dark Energy–a Classical Description Using Measurement Quantization
2021
[24] Describing Elementary Charge Using Only Planck Units
2021
[25] Planck’s Constant – Request for Redefinition with Increased Precision
2021
[26] Frames of Reference Still Misunderstood; There’s a Third Frame
2021
[27] Describing the Electric Constant Using Only Planck Units
2021
[28] Fine Structure Constant
2021
[29] Classical Description of Mass in the Universe without Λ and CDM
2021
[30] Magnetic Constant
2021
[31] Classical Description of the CMB Power Spectrum Without ΛCDM
2021
[32] Distance Associated with Blackbody Radiation
2021
[33] Spatial Curvature Incompatible with Discrete Phenomena
2021
[34] Measurements of CMB Age Confirms a 363,309 Year Quantum Epoch
2021
[35] Determinism and the Foundations of Quantum Behavior
2020
[36] Simplest Relation Between Fundamental Length, Mass, and Time
2020
[37] Physical Significance of Count Bounds to the Fundamental Measures
2020
[38] Length Contraction Associated with Discrete Measure Resolves CODATA Constants Tension
2020
[39] Four New Constants of Nature
2020
[40] Correlating the Newton and Planck Constants
2020
[41] Physical Approach to Demonstrating Singularities Cannot Exist
2020
[42] Classical Description of Discrete Gravity
2020
[43] Hubble's Constant and the Underlying Physics of Expansion
2020
[44] What is the Physical Difference Between Baryonic and Electromagnetic Phenomena?
2020
[45] Discrete Approach to the Contraction and Dilation of Measure with Respect to a Gravitational Mass
2020
[46] Discrete Approach to Deriving the Equivalence Principle as a Predicted Outcome
2020
[47] Universe Offers Shared Value for the Measure of Angle and Momentum at the Planck Bound – 3.26239030392(48)
2020
[48] Establishing the Discreteness of Measure in the Frame of the Observer
2020
[49] Discrete Approach Offers Physical Confirmation: Three Spatial Dimensions
2020
[50] Three Frames of Reference Prerequisite to Deriving the Physical Constants
2020
[51] Upper Bound to Baryonic Mass Density
2020
[52] What Defines the Fundamental Measures
2020
[53] Classical Approach to Orbital Star Velocity Obviates Dark Matter Conjecture While Demonstrating Path of Lowest Energy
2020
[54] Frames of Reference
2020
[55] Informativity Differential
2020
[56] Measurement Quantization Describes History of Universe—Quantum Inflation, Transition to Expansion, CMB Power Spectrum
2020
[57] Gravitational Constant
2020
[58] Fundamental Measures
2020
[59] Fundamental Constant
2020
[60] Hubble's Constant
2020
[61] Bounds to Measurement Frequency
2020
[62] Discrete Expressions for the Gravitational Constant Offer Improved Precision G=6.6740779428(56) 10-11 m^3/kg s^2
2020
[63] More Precise Expressions for the Planck Units
2020
[64] Underlying Physics of the Hubble Tension 67.861–73.915 km s-Mpc
[65] Extending Precision of the Physical Constants
[66] Confirming the Discreteness of Measure with a New Form of Length Contraction
[67] Establishing the Discreteness of Measure with Respect to the Internal Frame of the Universe
[68] Physical Significance of Count Bounds of the Fundamental Measures
[69] Three Fundamental Constants
[70] Classical Description of the CMB Power Spectrum Without Λ or CDM
[71] Physical Significance of the Transition from Classical to Non-classical Behavior in the Orbits of Stars
[72] How to Derive Physical Constants Using Quantization Ratios as a Function of the Discrete and Non-discrete Frames
[73] Reduced Planck Constant–A New Approach with Increased Precision
[74] Dark Energy–a Geometric Phenomenon
[75] Time Dilation Between the Quantum and Expansionary Epochs
[76] Support for a Universe without Curvature
[77] Correlating the Gravitational and Reduce Planck Constants
[78] Distance Corresponding to the Length Contraction Associated with a Measure of Charge Couplings
[79] Length Contraction Associated with Discrete Measure Resolves the Planck Units Tension
[80] Distance Corresponding to the Length Contraction Associated with a Measure of Blackbody Radiation
[81] Reduced Planck Constant–Request for Redefinition with Increased Precision
[82] Universe Offers Shared Value for the Measure of Angle and Momentum at the Planck Bound–3.26239030392 (48)
[83] Distance Corresponding to the Length Contraction Associated with a Measure of Elementary Charge
[84] Classical Approach to Discrete Gravity
[85] Fundamental Measures-More Precise Expressions for the Planck Units
[86] Discrete Approach to the Contraction and Dilation of Measure with Respect to Motion
[87] Deriving the Planck Unit Expressions
[88] Discrete Approach to Star Velocity Resolves Dark Matter Phenomenon
[89] Describing Coulomb's Constant Using Only the Fundamental Measures
[90] Describing the Electric Constant Using Only the Fundamental Measures
[91] Describing Elementary Charge Using Only the Fundamental Measures
[92] Describing the Fine Structure Constant Using Only the Fundamental Measures
[93] Describing the Magnetic Constant Using Only the Fundamental Measures
[94] Discrete Expressions for the Gravitational Constant Offer Improved Precision G= 6.6740779428 (56) 10-11 m 3 kg-s-2
[95] Planck's Constant–Request for Redefinition with Increased Precision
[96] Simplest Relation Between Fundamental Units of Length, Mass, and Time
[97] What Defines the Fundamental Measures?
[98] Introduction to Measurement Quantization
[99] Establishing the Discreteness of Measure with Respect to the Frame of the Observer
[100] Measurements of CMB Age Confirm a 363,309 Year Quantum Epoch
[101] Introduction to Measurement Quantization Supplemental Materials
[102] 363,309 Year Quantum Epoch Confirmed by Time Dilation of the CMB Age
[103] Universe Offers Shared Value for the Measure of Angle and Momentum at the Planck Bound–3.26239030392
[104] Discrete Description of Nature Avoids Singularities While Replacing Need for Quantum Gravity
[105] Discrete Approach to the Contraction and Dilation of Measure with Respect to an Inertial Mass
[106] Discrete Approach to Describing the Kinetic Energy Associated with Stars
[107] Frames of Reference Still Misunderstood; There'sa Third Frame
[108] Demonstrating that Stars Follow the Path of Least Energy Using Only Classical Mechanics
[109] Distance Associated with Elementary Charge
Free SCIRP Newsletters
Copyright © 2006-2024 Scientific Research Publishing Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Top