Critical Evaluation of a Survey Claiming “Long-Term Adverse Outcomes from Neonatal Circumcision”*

Journals Menu

Follow SCIRP

ISSN Print: 2164-5191
ISSN Online: 2164-5205
www.scirp.org/journal/asm
E-mail: asm@scrip.org

"Critical Evaluation of a Survey Claiming “Long-Term Adverse Outcomes from Neonatal Circumcision”*"
written by Stefan A. Bailis, Stephen Moreton, Brian J. Morris,
published by Advances in Sexual Medicine, Vol.9 No.4, 2019

has been cited by the following article(s):

[1]	The Contrasting Evidence Concerning the Effect of Male Circumcision on Sexual Function, Sensation, and Pleasure: A Systematic Review
	2020

[2]	Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review
	2019

[1]	Examining Clinical Practice Guidelines for Male Circumcision:A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal Using AGREE II The Journal of Pediatrics, 2022 DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.12.073

[2]	Examining Clinical Practice Guidelines for Male Circumcision: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal Using AGREE II The Journal of Pediatrics, 2022 DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.12.073

[3]	The Contrasting Evidence Concerning the Effect of Male Circumcision on Sexual Function, Sensation, and Pleasure: A Systematic Review Sexual Medicine, 2020 DOI:10.1016/j.esxm.2020.08.011

[4]	Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2019 DOI:10.1111/jebm.12361

Follow SCIRP