|
[1]
|
Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix: a multicenter, retrospective study
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics,
2022
DOI:10.1007/s00404-021-06298-y
|
|
|
|
|
[2]
|
Predictive factors for successful cervical ripening using a double‐balloon catheter after previous cesarean delivery
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics,
2018
DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12566
|
|
|
|
|
[3]
|
Predictive factors for successful cervical ripening using a double-balloon catheter after previous cesarean delivery
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics,
2018
DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12566
|
|
|
|
|
[4]
|
Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics,
2017
DOI:10.1007/s00404-017-4343-7
|
|
|
|
|
[5]
|
Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics,
2016
DOI:10.1007/s00404-015-3907-7
|
|
|
|
|
[6]
|
Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology,
2016
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.505
|
|
|
|