Author(s)

Farshad Zahmatkesh¹, Ali M. Memari²

¹The Pennsylvania Housing Research Center, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
²Department of Architectural Engineering and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Fire effects can be one of the most harmful conditions that any building may experience throughout its service life. Developing practical protection methods and concepts against potential fire disasters in buildings has been an important consideration in design of buildings in recent decades. Rapid developments in technology have heightened the demand for new and innovative fire protection systems in comparison with conventional and traditional methods. Such a need for new technologies is in particular of greater importance when it comes to existing buildings. Retrofitting an existing building for fire safety is a greater challenge compared with designing a new building using materials and components that have more desirable and superior fire rating to begin with. Furthermore, strategies to design a new building that includes state-of-the-art fire safety features are also different from solutions that may be more suitable for retrofitting an existing building. This paper presents a review of the literature concerning conventional and new or innovative retrofitting methods for fire safety of buildings. Advantages and disadvantages of different fire protection devices and methods as available and understood from the literature are mentioned. Study of fire safety systems shows that each has its drawbacks. Comparison of the results shows that disadvantages of a solitary system for retrofitting against fire can be improved by using a combination of several fire safety concepts or methods simultaneously.

Fire Retrofitting, Fire Safety, Building Components, Conventional Method, Innovative Technology

Zahmatkesh, F. and Memari, A. (2017) Review of Conventional and Innovative Technologies for Fire Retrofitting of Existing Buildings. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 7, 222-244. doi: 10.4236/ojce.2017.72014.