Procedural & Distributive Justice and Amenability to Psychological Treatment in Juvenile Delinquents

HTML  XML Download Download as PDF (Size: 352KB)  PP. 57-66  
DOI: 10.4236/aasoci.2016.62006    4,802 Downloads   6,247 Views  Citations

ABSTRACT

This study was aimed at testing a structural model that analyzed the relationship between procedural and distributive justice and the amenability of psychological treatment for juvenile delinquents. Ninety-two adolescents receiving treatment in detention and community facilities following a judge’s sentence constituted the sample. Participants responded to a questionnaire including items that investigated the perception of police and judicial procedures and decisions, and the acceptance of psychological treatments. A structural equation model was specified and tested. Three factors were indicated “perception of police treatment”, “procedural justice”, “distributive justice”, and “amenability of the treatment”. It was expected a direct relationship between procedural and distributive justice and distributive justice and amenability of the treatment. It was also projected a direct relationship between distributive justice and amenability of the treatment. Results revealed that the adolescent’s positive perception of the judicial procedure predicted positively the amenability of both the treatment and the distributive justice system. Perception of the police treatment had an effect on procedural justice. Those findings seem to indicate that if adolescents perceive a fair police treatment and procedure, their acceptance of the treatment and sentence will be more likely. Such an outcome, in turn, could help in their reintegration to society.

Share and Cite:

Frías-Armenta, M. , López-Escobar, A. and Silveira, G. (2016) Procedural & Distributive Justice and Amenability to Psychological Treatment in Juvenile Delinquents. Advances in Applied Sociology, 6, 57-66. doi: 10.4236/aasoci.2016.62006.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.