Are the Typologies Determined by the Post-Critical Belief Scale Predicted Well by the Religious Attitudes and Behaviour of Maltese Undergraduate Students?
Mary Anne Lauri, Josef Lauri, Joseph Borg
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2011.25063   PDF    HTML     5,520 Downloads   9,571 Views   Citations


Religious beliefs play an important role in the study of religious practices and behaviour. Wulff (1997) suggested that there are four basic attitudes towards religion: Literal Affirmation, Literal Disaffirmation, Reductive Interpretation and Restorative Interpretation. Building on this work, Duriez, Soenans and Hutsebaut (2005) constructed the Post-Critical Belief Scale (PCBS). In their work, Duriez at al. conducted a Principal Component Analysis of the responses to this questionnaire. It yielded two factors which partitioned 2-dimensional space into four quadrants corresponding to the four types of beliefs postulated by Wulff (1997). The research question which is addressed in this paper is whether there is an association between scores on the PCBS and religious practices and behaviour in a staunchly Catholic country like Malta where over 98% are baptized in the Roman Catholic Church. This question was addressed by administering a questionnaire to a random sample of 650 students at the University of Malta, of which 421 completed the questionnaire. Of those who answered the questionnaire, 349 were undergraduates. The questionnaire consisted of a number of questions about religious attitudes and behaviour, and also included the PCBS. The analysis of the association between membership of one of the four belief typologies and the participants’ responses to other questions related to religious beliefs, religious practice and sexual norms was carried out using Discriminant Analysis. The results indicate that, at least in this sample of Maltese university students, these three measures do a reasonably good job in identifying membership in three of Wulff’s four belief typologies.

Share and Cite:

Lauri, M. , Lauri, J. & Borg, J. (2011). Are the Typologies Determined by the Post-Critical Belief Scale Predicted Well by the Religious Attitudes and Behaviour of Maltese Undergraduate Students?. Psychology, 2, 405-410. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.25063.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Argyle, M. (2000). Psychology and religion: An introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
[2] Bateson, C. D., Schroenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
[3] Discern (2006). Sunday mass attendance, census 2005, preliminary report. Maltese Islands.
[4] Duriez, B., & Hautsebaut, D. (2000). The relation between religion and racism: the role of post-critical beliefs. Mental Health, Religion and culture, 3, 85-102. doi:10.1080/13674670050002135
[5] Duriez, B., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Hutsebaut, D. (2000). A further elaboration of the Post-Critical Believe Scale: Evidence for the existence of the four different approaches to religion in flanders-Belgium. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 1-30.
[6] Duriez, B., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2004). Personality, identity styles, and religiosity: An integrative study among late adolescents in Flanders. Journal of Personality, 72, 877-910. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00284.x
[7] Duriez, B., Soenens, B., & Hutsebaut, D. (2005). Introducing the shortened Post-Critical Belief Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 851-857. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.06.009
[8] Duriez, B., Dezutter, J. Neyrinck, B., & Hutsebaut, D. (2007). An introduction to the Post-Critical Belief scale: Internal structures and External relationships. Psyke and Logos, 28, 767-793.
[9] Fontaine, J., R., Duriez, B., Luyten, P., & Hutsebaut, D. (2003). The internal structure of the Post-Critical Belief scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 501-518. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00213-1
[10] Hutsebaut, D. (1996). Post-Critical Belief a new approach to the religious attitude problem. Journal of Empirical Theology, 9, 48-66. doi:10.1163/157092596X00132
[11] Lauri, M. A., Lauri, J. & Duriez, B. (2009). Social representations of religion of Maltese university Students. In E. P. Lamont (Ed.), Social psychology: New research (pp. 235-256). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
[12] LaPierre, R. T. (1934). Atitudes and actions. Social Forces, 13, 230- 237. doi:10.2307/2570339
[13] The World Factbook (2008). Europe: Malta, Religions. URL (last checked 30 August 2011)
[14] Wulff, D. M. (1997). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.