Perturbation of Hydrogen Degenerate Levels and *SO*(4) ()

Enrico Onofri

1Dipartimento di Fisica e Scienze della Terra, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy 2INFN, Gruppo Collegato di Parma, Parma, Italy.

**DOI: **10.4236/jmp.2014.512106
PDF
HTML XML
2,699
Downloads
3,721
Views
Citations

1Dipartimento di Fisica e Scienze della Terra, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy 2INFN, Gruppo Collegato di Parma, Parma, Italy.

We
present a short note about the perturbative correction to Rydberg energies
under a perturbation cos*θ*/*r ^{μ}* and discuss the role of

Keywords

Share and Cite:

Onofri, E. (2014) Perturbation of Hydrogen Degenerate Levels and *SO*(4). *Journal of Modern Physics*, **5**, 1051-1054. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2014.512106.

1. Introduction

The subject of this short note stems from a classroom exercise. I proposed my students to evaluate the effect on the degenerate levels of the hydrogen atom of a perturbation with potential energy. At the first order in perturbation theory this problem requires the diagonalization of the matrix representing the perturbation restricted to the degenerate subspace (see Appendix A).

(1)

The problem in itself appears to involve a rather standard (and boring) calculation based on the properties of Laguerre and Legendre functions. To save time one can attack the problem using a computer algebra system, like Mathematica^{1} and the matrix can be readily constructed; if we are lucky enough, its spectrum could be exhibited in closed form or at least in numerical terms. Now, the surprise is that the eigenvalues turn out to be all simple rationals of the form where m runs from to and they are degenerate. The result is so simple that one cannot be satisfied by the brute-force calculation, and he or she is forced to look for some explanation. Obviously the first idea that comes to mind is that this result should rely on some Lie-algebraic property. In the following I’m going to explain how hydrogen’s symmetry accounts for the result.

2. Dipole Operators and the SO(4) Generators

The origin of the Lie-theoretic explanation lies in one of the first papers about quantum mechanics [1] . In the book by Gottfried and Yan [2] ^{2} one can find all details in a masterly presentation. In this note, however, we present a somewhat simpler derivation, suitable for an introductory Quantum Mechanics course. In particular we give a simple derivation of Pauli’s link between Casimir operator and the Hamiltonian, which cannot be found in most textbooks (see Appendix B). Other relevant information is contained in the recent paper [3] with generalization to higher multipoles.

The fact is: hydrogen atom, in its simplest terms, described by the Hamiltonian, exhibits a larger degeneracy than required by rotational invariance, the level being degenerate. This fact was related, since Pauli’s paper, to the presence of an extra conserved vector quantity, which in classical mechanics is known as the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector and was used by Pauli in the calculation of the spectrum. This should be considered as the first example of dynamical symmetry in Quantum Mechanics. The quantum conserved vector is

(2)

where and. Since commutes with the Hamiltonian it can be normalized by adding a factor in such a way that and close the Lie algebra of under commutation. In his 1926 paper Pauli showed that this fact was sufficient to derive Balmer’s formula and the “dipole matrix elements” in terms of the matrix of in the same degenerate subspace. Denoting by the orthogonal projector on the degenerate subspace, it is immediately realized that; no contributions arise from the term which has vanishing matrix elements between degenerate states since it coincides with the commutator. Now, since N belongs to the Lie algebra of the symmetry group, its spectrum is fixed by group theory alone. Simply enough, where are the generators of the two factors of. Since and commute, and the total angular momentum is for each of them, the spectrum is simply given by that is with degeneracy. As a result the spectrum of the matrix is precisely given, as anticipated, by

(3)

For the sake of completeness we recall the detailed expression for the eigenfunctions and the matrix elements in appendix.

3. Conclusion

It is clear that the use of a symbolic algebra system can easily give the spectrum of the dipole x or, more generally,. For instance one can check immediately that the matrix identically vanishes for, the case of the electric dipole perturbation. However the connection with group theory gives a deeper insight into the result, which by itself could remain a simple mathematical curiosity. Let us notice that in the classical book [4] by Condon and Shortley the calculations of the Stark effect perturbative corrections to the Balmer energies are beautifully obtained using parabolic coordinates, but the result of Equation (3) takes on a new light when interpreted group-theoretically.

Acknowledgements

This paper has a mere didactic interest and it is related to my thesis of 1968. It is my pleasure to thank Prof. Massimo Pauri, then my advisor and today Professor Emeritus at our Department, who taught me quite a lot about symmetry and group theory in Quantum Mechanics.

Appendix A

We adopt the convention for the hydrogen eigenfunctions as follows:

The non-vanishing matrix elements for are explicitly given by

Appendix B

We prove the relation

(4)

In classical mechanics it holds which clearly cannot hold in quantum mechanics, since the left hand side annihilates the ground state. Quantum commutators provide the shift which fixes the ground state. This was emphasized by Pauli in [1] . Now to the proof: since the action of spans the whole energy level and the identity links together invariants, we can limit ourselves to check the validity of Equation (4) to states. So we may reduce the proof to the more tractable identity

or, by defining, we are left to prove

(5)

Now, on s-states the definition of gives

For instance annihilates, has the value and the relation is satisfied. Now in general, instead of evaluating it’s easier to check Equation (5) on the quadratic form

Indeed,

NOTES

^{1}©Wolfram Research.

^{2}I am indebted to Prof. G. Cicuta for attracting my attention to this reference.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

[1] |
Pauli, W. (1926) Zeitschrift fur Physik, 36, 336-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01450175 |

[2] | Gottfried, K. and Yan, T.-M. (2004) Quantum Mechanics, Fundamentals. 2nd Edition, Springer, New York. |

[3] | Ostrovsky, V.N., Vrinceanu, D. and Flannery, M.R. (2006) Physical Review A, 74, Article ID: 022720. |

[4] | Condon, E.U. and Shortley, G.H. (1964) The Theory of Atomic Spectra. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |

Journals Menu

Contact us

+1 323-425-8868 | |

customer@scirp.org | |

+86 18163351462(WhatsApp) | |

1655362766 | |

Paper Publishing WeChat |

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.