Existence of Positive Solutions for Boundary Value Problem of Nonlinear Fractional q-Difference Equation ()
1. Introduction
Considering the following boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional q-difference equation:
(P)
where
is a nonnegative continuous function and
is the fractional q-derivative of the Riemann-Liouville type.
Fractional differential calculus is a discipline to which many researchers are dedicating their time, perhaps because of its demonstrated applications in various fields of science and engineering [1]. Recently, there are many papers dealing with the boundary value problem of fractional differential equations, see [2-5] and references therein.
The q-difference calculus or quantum calculus is an old subject that was initially developed by Jackson [6,7], and basic definitions and properties of q-difference calculus can be found in [8]. The fractional q-difference calculus had its origin in the works by Al-Salam [9] and Agarwal [10]. More recently, maybe due to the explosion in research within the fractional differential calculus setting, new developments in this theory of fractional qdifference calculus were made, see [11,12].
The question of the existence of positive solutions for fractional q-difference boundary value problems is in its infancy, see [13-16]. No contributions exist, as far as we know, concerning the existence of positive solutions for problem (P).
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, some preliminaries are presented. In Section 3, we discuss the existence of positive solutions for problem (P).
2. Preliminaries
Let
and define
(2.1)
The q-analogue of the power function
with
is
(2.2)
More generally, if
, then
(2.3)
Note that, if
then
. The q-gamma function is defined by
(2.4)
and satisfies
The q-derivative of a function
is here defined by
(2.5)
and q-derivative of higher order by
(2.6)
The q-integral of a function
defined in the interval
is given by
(2.7)
If
and
defined in the interval
, its integral from
to
is defined by
(2.8)
Remark 2.1. (see [17]) If
and
on
, then

Similarly as done for derivatives, an operator
can be defined, namely,
(2.9)
The fundamental theorem of calculus applies to these operators
and
, i.e.,
(2.10)
and if
is continuous at
, then
(2.11)
Basic properties of the two operators can be found in [14]. We now point out three formulas that will be used later (
denotes the derivative with respect to variable
)



Remark 2.2. (see [14]) We note that if
and
, then
(2.12)
Definition 2.3. (see [10]) Let
and
be a function defined on
. The fractional q-integral of the Riemann-Liouville type is
and
(2.13)
Definition 2.4. (see [14-16]) The fractional q-derivative of the Riemann-Liouville type of order
is defined by
and
(2.14)
where
is the smallest integer greater than or equal to
.
Next, we list some properties that are already known in the literature.
Lemma 2.5. (see [14-16]) Let
and
be a function defined on
, Then, the next formulas hold:
1) 
2) 
Lemma 2.6. (see [14-16]) Let
and
be a positive integer. Then, the following equality holds:
(2.15)
Let
, in view of Lemma 2.5 and Lemma 2.6, we see that

for some constants
Using the boundary condition
we have
Differentiating both side of the above equality, one gets
(2.16)
Using the boundary condition
, we have
similarly, we have
From
(2.17)
and boundary value problem
, one can obtain
(2.18)
Putting all things together we finally have
(2.19)
If we define a function
by
(2.20)
Hence, in order to solve the problem (P), it is sufficient to find positive solutions of the following integral equation
(2.21)
Some properties of the function
needed in the sequel are now stated and proved.
Lemma 2.7. Function
defined above satisfies the following conditions:
(2.22)
(2.23)
Proof. Let
(2.24)
and
(2.25)
It is clear that
. Now,
. For
, in view of (2.3) and Remark 2.2, we have
(2.26)
Therefore,
. Moreover,
(2.27)
i.e.,
is an increasing function of x. Obviously,
is increasing in x, therefore,
is an increasing function of x for fixed
This concludes the proof of (2.22).
Suppose now that
then
(2.28)
If
, then
(2.29)
and this finishes the proof of (2.23).
Let
be the Banach space endowed with norm
Define the cone
by

It follows from the non-negativeness and continuity of
and
that the operator
defined by
(2.30)
is completely continuous [18]. Moreover, for
in view of (2.22) and (2.23), we have
on
and
(2.31)
that is 
Lemma 2.8. (see [19]) Let
be a Banach space,
a cone, and
two bounded open balls of
centered at the origin with
. Suppose that
is a completely continuous operator such that either 1) 
or 2)
holds. Then
has a fixed point in 
3. Main Results
Let
where
will be defined later.
Theorem 3.1. Suppose that
is a nonnegative continuous function on
. In addition, suppose that one of the following two conditions holds:
(H1) 
(H2) 
Then problem (P) has at least one positive solution.
Proof. Note that the operator
is completely continuous. Now, assume that condition (H1) holds. Since
, there exists an
such that
(3.1)
where the constant
such that
(3.2)
Thus,

This, together with the definitions of
and Lemma 2.7, implies that for any 
(3.3)
That is, for any

On the other hand, from
it follows that there exists a
such that
(3.4)
where the constant
satisfies
(3.5)
Let
. Then we have
(3.6)
Let
and
, then
(3.7)
Thus, the operator
satisfies condition of Lemma 2.8. Consequently, the operator
has at least one fixed point
, which is one positive solution of the problem (P).
Next, we suppose that condition (H2) holds. The proof is similar to that of the case in which (H1) holds and will only be sketched here. Let
with
. Select two positive constants
with
and
, respectively. Then, there exist two positive constants
and
such that
(3.8)
(3.9)
It follows from that for
,
(3.10)
In addition, let
. If
, then
(3.11)
and
(3.12)
In view of Remark 2.1, for
, we have
(3.13)
Thus,
for
. Consequently, the operator
has at least one fixed point
, which is one positive solution of the problem (P).
Example 3.2

where
Obviously,

Thus, by the first part of Theorem 3.1, we can get that the problem above has at least one positive solution.
NOTES