Microbial Quality of Wastewater Used in Urban Truck Farming and Health Risks Issues in Developing Countries: Case Study of Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso ()
1. Introduction
The rapid development of population, climate changes impact and the increase in the demand of agricultural products led to a high pressure on water resources in the world [1]. Faced with this situation, the research of alternative resources is required. In the context, nowadays wastewaters are particularly focused, due to their availability and their agronomic value [2-7]. Indeed, about 20 million hectares of land are irrigated with wastewaters highly polluted by solid or liquid wastes in the world. Moreover, more than 10% of the world population consumes aliments issued from cultures irrigated with wastewater and this percentage in more important for populations in arid or semiarid poor countries [8]. The cities of developing countries were characterized during the last years by an exponential increase in population due to natural growth and by a massive rural exodus leading to a densification of urban area, a high pressure on natural resources along with water, and an intensification of poverty [8-10]. Due to the situation of endemic poverty, many poor citizens rescue to wastewater-based agriculture, especially truck farming to survive. According to FAO [11], such practice is ancient and 200 million urban farmers in the world may rescue to partially or not treated wastewater for irrigation. In West Africa, approximately 49%, 38%, and 13% of wastewater treatment effluents are used for truck farming, horticulture, and fish breeding, respectively [12]. In Burkina Faso, it is estimated to 56 m3/day the quantity of wastewater used for truck farming in Ouagadougou, and to 70 ha the area covered by this activity [13,14].
However, wastewater reuse for agriculture prior to treatment exposes populations and the environment as well to health risks [7,10,15,16]. Indeed, several epidemiological studies revealed that wastewater or activated sludge reuse are potential sources of chemical and microbiological contaminations of surface water tables [1,5,12, 17]. In developing countries, about 3 million die prematurely of waterborne diseases along with a majority of children under 5 years old followed by women and poor populations without access to safe drinking water and adequate sanitation [12,18].
After the presentation of the context of the study and the methodology used, the results obtained will be presented. The quality of wastewaters used in truck farming will be discussed with regard to WHO and national guidelines for wastewater reuse in agriculture [19,20], the health-related potential risks for populations, and the performance of the wastewater treatment technology.
2. Study Context
In Ouagadougou city, truck farming next to wastewater storage sites (water reservoir of dam, canal for wastewater collection, pond…) is expanding rapidly. This activity practiced by many poor citizen among which a majority of women (Figure 1) contributes to increase households income and to a lesser extent to wastes recycling and environment sanitation [8,10,14,21,22].
However, despite the positive effect at economic development level and to overcome poverty, truck farming as practiced in Ouagadougou city is problematic because of the microbial quality of wastewater used for irrigation. Indeed, this water which consists of liquid and solid wastes is reused prior to treatment. Due to the complexity of the chemical and microbial components of this water and the high-risk practices, this activity exposes producers, vegetable consumers and the population to health risks [6,8,9,13,14,16,23].
Mindful of the control of health risks for populations related to urban agriculture, we examined the bacteriological and parasitological quality of surface wastewaters used in truck farming in the urban area of Ouagadougou during the dry-hot period (May), the wet season (July), and in waste stabilization ponds of treatment plants in 2012.
3. Material and Methods
3.1. Study Sites
Eight (8) sites among whose 3 water reservoirs of Ouagadougou dam (Ouaga 1, Ouaga 2 and Ouaga 3), 2 canals collecting wastewaters (Canal UO and Canal CHU), and the anaerobic, maturation and discharge ponds of 3 wastewater treatment plants (Abattoir, Kossodo and 2iE) were selected for the study (Figure 2).
The Kossodo plant is treating wastewaters issued from the industrial zone of Kossodo and the effluents of the Abattoir plant which treats essentially wastewaters of the slaughterhouse of Ouagadougou located in the same area. As for the 2iE treatment plant, it receives wastewaters from the Zone of Ouagadougou University including those of the Canal UO.
The waste stabilization ponds technology is a natural technique allowing refining wastewater through the combined action of microorganisms, algae, and aquatic plants and consists of a slow flow of wastewater through several retention ponds (3 to 5). Generally, the ponds comprise an anaerobic pond (AP) intended to decrease the carbon charge, a facultative pond (FP) conceived to refine the organic matter treatment, a maturation pond (MP) allowing the complete elimination of pathogens (bacteria, virus, parasites, helminthes), a storage pond (SP) of the treated water from the MP, and a discharge pond/canal [24,25].
The geographic location of the sampling sites and the main usage of water at the site are described in Table 1 and Figure 1.
3.2. Water Sampling
Samples collection was performed in the median part of the stretch of water at the water reservoirs and canals. At the wastewater treatment plants, sampling was performed similarly in the anaerobic and maturation ponds and in the discharge pond/canal as well. Samples were collected aseptically in quadruplicate into sterile glass bottles at the field as describes previously [26]. A total of 56 samples including the ones of water treatment plants were taken and analyzed during the dry-hot period for which water demand and pressure on water sources were particularly high, while 20 samples focusing mainly dam and canal waters were investigated during the wet period. Samples collected at the site were preserved at 4˚C in cool boxes, carried to the Laboratory of Biology of the Institute for Health Sciences Research and stored in a refrigerator at 4˚C before analysis.
3.3. Enumeration of Microbial Indicators of Fecal Pollution
Bacterial and parasite indicators of fecal contamination (Escherichia coli, fecal Coliforms, fecal Streptococcus, and parasite eggs and/or cysts were enumerated 3 - 4 hours following sampling.
The bacterial indicators were enumerated using the
Table 1. Location of the study sites and main usage of water at the site.
membrane filtration technique [27,28] and the chromogenic media RAPID E. COLI 2 AGAR (BIO RAD) for the detection of E. coli and fecal coliforms, and BileEsculine-Azide for fecal Streptococcus count. Bacterial cells were concentrated on a 0.2 µm Millipore Membrane Filter followed by culture on the chromogenic media. On the RAPID E. COLI 2 AGAR (BIO RAD) medium which contains 2 substrates specific to the β-D-Glucuronidase (Gluc) and β-D-Galactosidase (Gal) enzymes, respectively, after 24 h incubation period at 44.5˚C, colonies of E. coli (Gal+/Gluc+) appear violet to pink while other fecal coliforms colonies stain blue. On the BileEsculine-Azide medium, Gram positive cells able to reduce Esculine as fecal Streptococcus stain black after 24 h incubation period at 37˚C, while Gram negative and other Gram positive cells are inhibited by sodium Azide.
Parasite eggs and/or cysts were identified and enumerated according to Ritchie [29] and consisted of a concentration of parasites with Formalin and Ether followed by a microscopic observation of the precipitate using lens 10 and 40 for the detection of parasite eggs or larva, and lens 100 with immersion oil after addition of two drops of a Iodine-Potassium iodide solution for the research of protozoa cysts.
3.4. Statistical Method
Data obtained were analyzed for water source and sampling period variations using the Student’s t-test and XLSTAT 7.5.2 statistical software. Mean parameters concentrations were compared according to the Newman Keuls’ test.
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Microbial Quality of Surface Wastewater
The results of the statistical analysis on the data obtained are presented in Table 2 while the mean characteristics of wastewater are shown in Table 3.
The Student’s t-test (Table 2) revealed that all the microbial characteristics of water were significantly related to the sampling site (p < 0.0001) and sampling period as well (p < 0.0001). The joined effects of site and sampling period affected also significantly (p < 0.0001) these characteristics. The spatial and temporal variations in response to sampling site and sampling period implied that water samples were collected from sources of different microbial characteristics which are more influenced by the period of water collection.
For all the wastewater sources, mean concentrations of microbial pollution indicators (Table 3) were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in the dry period (May) compared to the wet one (July). Indeed, the dry period supports a very high pressure on water sources for diverse activities along with truck farming (Figures 1(a)-(d)), animals watering, Fishing, washing, and others activities leading to water pollution and a drastic decrease in water table. This situation favors conditions for the proliferation of microorganisms. Conversely, during the wet season, apart from the decrease in activities next to the study sites, the increase in water table due to streaming creates a dilution factor leading to less pronounced microbial concentrations; and that may explain the difference observed between these periods. These findings are in agreement with those recorded for wastewaters in the urban area of Ouagadougou by Nitiéma [7] and in the Sourou valley by Dianou et al. [6].
Globally, relatively high concentrations of Escherichia coli, fecal Coliforms and fecal Streptococcus, respectively were recorded in wastewater samples of the study sites during the dry and wet periods: Canal UO (53,400, 108,400 and 45,000 CFU/100ml), Canal CHU (53,800, 71,600 and 43,600 CFU/100ml), Ouaga 2 dam (3330, 35,700 and 5890 CFU/100ml), Ouaga 1 dam (2460, 8200 and 5360 CFU/100ml), and Ouaga 3 dam (2200, 11,250 and 650 CFU/100ml). Moreover, wastewater from the dams Ouaga 1, Ouaga 2 and Ouaga 3 which were much more intensively used for truck farming (Table 1), supported also the highest concentrations in parasites (Table 3). High concentrations for the same microbial indicators were also revealed by Cissé [13] and Cissé et al. [14] for wastewaters in the urban area of Ouagadougou and by other authors in other urban cities of developing countries [5,30-33]. Especially, the concentrations of fecal Coliforms (5 - 3000 × 103 CFU/100ml), fecal Streptococcus (1.9 - 138 × 103 CFU/100ml) and Helminthes (0 - 37 eggs/L) observed by Kouam et al. [8-10,16] in Yaoundé urban area support fully our findings.
4.2. Microbial Quality of Wastewater under Refining in Treatment Plants
The statistical analysis on the data obtained and the mean characteristics of water in the waste stabilization ponds are presented in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.
The Student’s t-test (Table 4) showed that all the microbial characteristics were significantly related to the treatment plant (p < 0.0001) and the waste stabilization pond as well (p < 0.0001). The joined effects of both factors affected also significantly (p < 0.0001) these characteristics.
For all the bacterial indicators of fecal pollution focused in the study and for all the waste stabilization ponds, the treatment plant of Kossodo supported the lowest concentrations (p < 0.0001) compared to the Abattoir and 2iE ones (Table 5). The Kossodo treatment plant
Table 5. Mean* concentrations of E. coli, fecal Coliforms, fecal Streptococcus and Helminthes in wastewater under refining at Kossodo, abattoir and 2iE treatment plants during the dry season (May 2012) (*mean of 4 replicates).
which belongs to the National Office of Water and Sanitation (ONEA) treats wastewaters from the industrial zone of Kossodo and those already pretreated within industrial units such as Abattoir and the tannery unit TANALIZ located in the same area. This pretreatment of wastewater may partially explain the difference in bacterial concentrations observed between the stabilizations ponds of Kossodo and Abattoir plants.
Globally and independently of the treatment plant, the maturation pond showed the lowest concentrations of bacterial indicators (p < 0.0001), while the highest concentrations were recorded in the anaerobic pond (p < 0.0001) (Table 5). Significant reductions (p < 0.0001) of 100%, 97.65%, 100% and 87.69% for E. coli, fecal Coliforms, fecal Streptococcus, and total helminthes, respectively were recorded between these ponds at Kossodo plant, while 96.25%, 97.07% and 89.42% reductions of the bacterial indicators were observed between the same ponds at Abattoir plant (Table 6). These reductions were less important, although significant at the 2iE plant with 82.35%, 78.17%, 59.52%, and 82.90%, respectively for these microbial indicators (Table 6). The high reductions of microbial concentrations in water between the anaerobic and the maturation ponds revealed the good performance of the waste stabilization ponds technology for wastewater refining, especially at Kossodo treatment plant and at a lesser extent at Abattoir and 2iE ones due to some functioning problems during the study period.
However, despite the relatively good performance of the waste stabilization ponds technology, the concentrations of the microbial indicators of fecal pollution after treatment in the maturation pond are not in agreement with the WHO and the national guidelines [19,20] which recommend <1000 CFU/100ml of fecal Coliforms and fecal Streptococcus, and <1 egg/L of total helminthes in wastewater for agriculture and aquaculture. As underlined Koné [34] and Maiga et al. [12,35], the refining performance of waste stabilization ponds technology as practiced in Sahelian zone, is impacted by several environmental factors along with ambient temperature, UV radiations, and pond depth. The inadequacy of these factors may also partially explain the differences observed in the results revealed by the present study. Moreover, a significant recontamination (p < 0.0001) of water was observed from the maturation pond into the discharge pond for all the treatment plants (Table 5). This situation imply the need to create conditions for the improvement and preservation of the water issued from the maturation pond for an appropriate usage of the refined effluent in urban agriculture as suggested by Maiga [12].
4.3. Truck Farming and Health-Related Risks Linked to Wastewater Quality
As underlined above, the concentrations of microbial indicators of fecal pollution in wastewater used for trucking farming in Ouagadougou urban area (Table 3) exceeded largely the WHO and the national recommended values [19,20]. Moreover, truck farming practices and type of fertilizers used (compost, manure, straw) is potential sources of microbial contaminations for the agricultural products. These situations expose truck farmers, sellers, consumers and all the populations in contact with the wastewaters to high health risks as also revealed Cissé [13], Cissé et al. [14] and Nitiema [7]. Other studies also underlined that wastewater reuse in urban agriculture represents an important health risks factor for
Table 6. Mean* reduction of E. coli, fecal Coliforms, fecal Streptococcus and Helminthes concentrations in wastewater under refining between the anaerobic and the maturation ponds at Kossodo, Abattoir and 2iE treatment plants (*mean of 4 replicates).
populations in developing countries [18,23,36,37]. Indeed, Kouam et al. [8,16] observed an increase of intestinal amoebiasis among truck farmers and truck farming product sellers in Yaoundé, Cameroun.
Other health risks related to wastewater reuse in urban agriculture were not focused in our study, especially those born to the concentrations of heavy metals and pesticides for which the cumulative effects affect populations’ health in the long term [19].
4.4. Some Issues to Control Health Risks Related to Wastewater Reuse in Urban Truck Farming
Overall, our study findings are supported by the data recorded by Kouam et al. [8-10,16] and Jimenez et al. [38] who showed that the pollution of water in cities of developing countries originated essentially from an inappropriate sanitation and from that, health risks related to wastewater reuse in urban truck farming were amplified by health-risk practices (inappropriate materials for water sampling, permanent contact with wastewater, lack of appropriate methods for vegetable and water disinfection, …).
In line with that, we examined the quality of wastewaters under refining in treatment plants. The refined waters within the maturation ponds showed a net decrease in microbial indicators of fecal pollution, indicating that the waste stabilization ponds technology for wastewater treatment prior to reuse for agriculture, notably truck farming, may provide an alternative issue for controlling health risks for populations in urban cities of developing countries. However, as also revealed the results obtained, the waste stabilization ponds technology, as practiced in Sahelian countries, especially in the urban area of Ouagadougou, should be improved to meet the WHO guideline values for a non restrictive water reuse for irrigation. For it, the control of environmental parameters such as UV radiations penetration in relation to pond depth as suggested Koné [34] and Maiga et al. [12], integrating a phytorefining system or photosensitizers into the maturation pond according to Kengne et al. [31], Sunda et al. [39], and Sunda [40], could help improving the refining performance of the technology.
Moreover, the promotion of sanitation and hygiene measures in addition to education on health-risk practices could help reducing health risks related to wastewater reuse in urban agriculture.
5. Conclusions
This study evidenced microbial pollutions in wastewater used for truck farming in the urban area of Ouagadougou and related potential health risks for truck farmers and consumers of products issued from this activity as well. Interestingly, the study also revealed that wastewater refining through waste stabilization ponds technology appeared as an alternative issue to reduce and control health risks related to this activity for populations in the urban area of Ouagadougou.
Considering the importance of urban truck farming to overcome unemployment and poverty, and health risks related to this activity, it is highly required to develop appropriate sanitation, in particular wastewater refining for urban agriculture for a sustainable development in urban area of developing countries.
6. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express profound gratitude to ISP-SUEDE/RA-BIOTECH, PACER-UEMOA/RA-BIOTECH, National Office of Water and Sanitation (ONEA) and CNRST/IRSS, for financial and technical supports.
NOTES