Emergency Thoracotomy: Indications and Management Challenges in a Developing World

Martins O. Thomas, Ezekiel O. Ogunleye

University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.

DOI: 10.4236/wjcs.2012.21001                

Abstract

Background: Emergency thoracotomies often challenge surgical logistics and they tend to produce inferior outcomes when compared with elective surgery. Aims: We sought to identify the specific indications and therapeutic challenges that go with patients who undergo thoracotomy within 24 hours of admission and the re-thoracotomies. Methodology: Spanning a 7-year period, the bio-data of patients who met our criteria for emergency thoracotomies were collated. We noted their indications for surgery, therapeutic challenges and outcome of care. Results: In all, 36 patients (28 males and 8 females) met the inclusion criteria. Majority, (66.7%) fell into the 20 - 39 year age range. Diaphragmatic rupture was the commonest indication, followed by massive intra-thoracic haemorrhage. Postoperative mortality occurred in 11.1% of patients. Postoperative ventilation was absolutely indicated in 6 patients. Discussion and Conclusion: Diaphragmatic rupture is the commonest indication for emergency thoracotomy. We noted the need for improvement in pre hospital care for trauma patients as a way to improve the management outcome of emergency thoracotomies.

Keywords

Emergency Thoracotomy; Indications; Definition; Outcome

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	K. Soreide, P. Petrone and J. A. Asencio, “Emergency Thoracotomy in Trauma: Rationale, Risks and Realities,” Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, Vol. 96, No. 1, 2007, pp. 4-10.
[2]	J. C. Mejia, R. M. Stewart and S. M. Cohn, “Emergency Department Thoracotomy,” Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2008, pp. 13-18. doi:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2008.01.005
[3]	M. Kaiser, P. Ahearn, X. M. Nguyen, A. Barleben, M. Cinat, et al., “Early Predictors of the Need for Emergency Surgery to Control Haemorrhage in Hypotensive Trauma Patients,” American Surgery, Vol. 75, No. 10, 2009, pp. 986-990.
[4]	K. Mashiko, H. Matsumoto, T. Mochizuki, K. Takuhiro, Y. Hara, et al., “Damage Control for Thoracic Injuries,” Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi, Vol. 103, No. 7, 2002, pp. 511-516.
[5]	J. Menaker, J. Cushman, J. M. Vermillion, R. E. Rosenthal and T. M. Scalea, “Ultrasound-Diagnosed Cardiac Tamponade after Blunt Abdominal Trauma Treated with Emergency Thoracotomy,” Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2007, pp. 99-103. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.05.036
[6]	T. Ahmad, S. W. Ahmed, N. Hussain and M. I. Khan, “Role of Urgent Thoracotomy in Improving the Survival of Patients with Severe Chest Trauma,” Journal of College Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, Vol. 19, No. 9, 2009, pp. 575-578.
[7]	M. Ben khadra, D. Honnart, F. Lenfant, P. Trouilloud, C. Girrard and M. Freysz, “Open Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Is There an Interest in France?” Annales Francaises d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Vol. 27, No. 11, 2008, pp. 920-933.
[8]	M. Kalima, E. Teeple and G. Fulda, “Are There Still Selected Applications for Resuscitative Thoracotomy in the Emergency Department after Blunt Trauma?” Delaware Medical Journal, Vol. 81, No. 5, 2009, pp. 195-198.
[9]	B. Karim, “Emergency Department Thoracotomy: Indications and Techniques of Resuscitative Thoracotomy,” An Online Publication, September 2006. www.trauma.org
[10]	D. Wise, G. Davies, T. Coats, D. Lockev, J. Hyde and A. Good, “Emergency Thoracotomy: ‘How to Do It’,” Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 10, 2005, pp. 22-24.
[11]	C. C. Cothren and E. E. Moore, “Emergency Department Thoracotomy for the Critically Injured Patient: Objectives, Indications and Outcomes,” World Journal of Emergency Surgery, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2006, pp. 1-4.
[12]	M. O. Thomas and E. O. Ogunleye, “Penetrating Chest Trauma in Lagos Nigeria,” Asian Cardiovascular & Thoracic Annals, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2005, pp. 103-106.