The Ecology of Keratella cochlearis in Lake Kinneret (Israel)

Moshe Gophen^1,2

¹Migal-Galilee Technology Center, Kiryat Shmona, Israel.
²Tel Hai College, Kiryat Shmona, Israel.

DOI: 10.4236/ojmh.2012.21001                

Abstract

A long term record of rotifers in Lake Kinneret (Israel) indicated that Keratella cochlearis is the most common zooplankter in it. Population dynamics parameters (“egg/female ratio” procedure) were combined with limnological data to analyze temporal fluctuations of K. cochlearis in the Kinneret ecosystem. Lake Kinneret is characterized by mesooligotrophic conditions. During the winter-spring period, when the lake is completely mixed and at low temperatures, water and nutrient inputs are maximal. The lake is stratified in the summer, with an oligotrophic epilimnion; at high temperatures, nutrient and water inputs are minimal. Since the early 1990’s, a decline in rainfall and water inputs and a reduction in Peridinium, coinciding with an ascending level of blue greens, were documented. K. cochlearis is affected by the water input regime, temperature, nutrient concentrations and the phytoplankton composition. The densities of individuals and egg bearing females are low in the summer and fall, and high during the late winter-spring, with E/F values being the highest during January-April. Population dynamics parameters were respectively similar. Regressions of densities of individuals and egg bearing females vs time (years) revealed a prominent long term decline.

Keywords

Keratella Cochlearis; Lake Kinneret; Long Term; Seasonal Dynamics

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	H. J. Dumont, “Biotic Factors in the Population Dynamics of Rotifers,” Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, Ergebnisse der Limnologie, Vol. 8, 1977, pp. 98-122.
[2]	R. L. Wallace and T. W. Snell, “Rotifera,” In: J. H. Torp and A. P. Covich, Eds., Ecology and classification of North Americn Freshwater Invertebrates, Academic Press, Cleveland, 2001, pp. 195-254. doi:10.1016/B978-012690647-9/50009-0
[3]	C., Serruya, M. Gophen and U. Pollingher, “Lake Kinneret: Carbon Flow Patterns and Ecosystem Management,” Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, Vol. 88, No. 3, 1980, pp. 265-302.
[4]	P. D. Walline, J. A. Tyler, S. B. Brandt, I. Ostrovsky and J. M. Jech, “Bleak Abundance: How Changes May Affect Consumption of Lake Kinneret Zooplankton,” Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, Advances in Limnology, Vol. 55, 2000, pp. 493-511.
[5]	M. Gophen, “Zooplankton,” In: C. Serruya ed., Lake Kin neret, Monographiae Biologicae, Junk Publishers, The Hague, 1978, pp. 297-311.
[6]	Hydrological Service of Israel, Annual Reports (in Hebrew), Israel Water Authority, 1972-2001.
[7]	LKDB—Lake Kinneret Data Base, M. Schleichter Manager, 1969-2001.
[8]	M. Gophen, “The Cladoceran Trophic Status in the Nitrogen Limited Ecosystem of Lake Kinneret (Israel),” Journal of Environmental Biology, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2011, pp. 455-462.
[9]	M. Gophen, Val H. Smith, A. Nishri and S. T. Threlkeld, “Nitrogen Deficiency, Phosphorus Sufficiency and the Invasion of Lake Kinneret, Israel, by the N2—Fixing Cy-anobacterium Aphanizomenon ovalisporum,” Aquatic sciences, Vol. 61, No. 4, 1999, pp. 293-306. doi:10.1007/PL00001326
[10]	A. Herzig, “Comparative Studies on the Relationship between Temperature and Duration of Embryonic Development of Rotifers,” Hydrobiologia, Vol. 104, No. 1, 1983, pp. 237-246. doi:10.1007/BF00045974
[11]	W. T. Edmondson, “Reproductive Rates of Rotifers in Natural Populations,” Ecological Monographs, Vol. 35, 1965, pp. 61-111. doi:10.2307/1942218
[12]	M. Gophen, “Seasonal Rotifer Dynamics in the Long-Term (1969-2002) Record from Lake Kinneret (Israel),” In: A. Herzig, R. D. Gulati, C. D. Jersabek, and L. May, Eds., Rotifera X: Rotifer Research: Trends, New Tools and Recent Advances Hydrobiologia, Vol. 546, 2005, pp. 443-450.
[13]	K. G. Bogdan and J. J. Gilbert, “Seasonal Patterns of Feeding by Natural Populations of Keratella, Polyarthra and Bosmina: Clearance Rates, Selectivities, and Contributions to Community Grazing,” Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1982, pp. 918-934. doi:10.4319/lo.1982.27.5.0918
[14]	C. W. Burns and J. J. Gilbert, “Effects of Daphnid Size and Density on Interference between Daphnia and Keratella cochlearis,” Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1986, pp. 848-858, 859-866. doi:10.4319/lo.1986.31.4.0848
[15]	C. W. Burns and J. J. Gilbert, “Direct Observations on the Mechanisms of Interference between Daphnia and Keratella cochlearis,” Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1986, pp. 859-866.
[16]	J. J. Gilbert and R. S. Stemberger, “Control of Keratella Poulations by Interference Competition from Daphnia,” Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1985, pp. 180-188. doi:10.4319/lo.1985.30.1.0180
[17]	J. J. Gilbert and C. E. Williamson, “Predator-Prey Behaviour and Its Effect on Rotifer Survival in Associations of Mesocyclops edax, Asplanchna girodi, Polyarthra vulgaris, and Keratella cochlearis,” Oecologia (Berlin), Vol. 37, No. 1, 1978, pp. 13-22. doi:10.1007/BF00349987
[18]	R. S. Stemberger, “Spine Development in the Rotifer Keratella cochlearis Induction by the Cyclopoid Copepods and Asplanchna,” Freshwater Biology, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1984, pp. 639-647. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1984.tb00183.x
[19]	N., Walz, “Continuous Culture of the Pelagic Rotifers Keratella cochlearis and Brachionus angularis,” Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, Vol. 98, 1983, pp. 70-92.
[20]	N. Walz, “Individual Culture and Experimental Population Dynamics of Keratella cochlearis (Rotatoria),” Hydrobiologia, Vol. 107, No. 1, 1983, pp. 35-45. doi:10.1007/BF00126701
[21]	W. T. Edmondson, “Reproductive Rate of Planktonic Rotifers as Related to Food and Temperature in Nature,” Ecological Monographs, Vol. 35, 1965, pp. 61-111. doi:10.2307/1942218