Erratum to “Assessment of Uinta Basin Oil and Natural Gas Well Pad Pneumatic Controller Emissions” [Journal of Environmental Protection, 2017, 8, 394-415]

Eben D. Thoma

Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Durham, NC, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/jep.2017.812088                

Abstract

In the fall of 2016, a field study was conducted in the Uinta Basin Utah to improve information on oil and natural gas well pad pneumatic controllers (PCs) and emission measurement methods. A total of 80 PC systems at five oil sites (supporting six wells) and three gas sites (supporting 12 wells) were surveyed, and emissions data were produced using a combination of measurements and engineering emission estimates. Ninety-six percent of the PCs surveyed were low actuation frequency intermittent vent type. The overall whole gas emission rate for the study was estimated at 0.36 scf/h with the majority of emissions occurring from three continuous vent PCs (1.1 scf/h average) and eleven (14%) malfunctioning intermittent vent PC systems (1.6 scf/h average). Oil sites employed, on average 10.3 PC systems per well compared to 1.5 for gas sites. Oil and gas sites had group average PC emission rates of 0.28 scf/h and 0.67 scf/h, respectively. This difference was due in part to differing site selection procedures used for oil and gas sites. The PC system types encountered, the engineering emissions estimate approach, and comparisons to measurements are described. Survey methods included identification of malfunctioning PC systems and emission measurements with augmented high volume sampling and installed mass flow meters, each providing a somewhat different representation of emissions that are elucidated through example cases.

Keywords

Pneumatic Controller Emissions, Oil and Natural Gas Production, Uinta Basin, Methane, Volatile Organic Compounds

Table 1. Site information and cumulative well pad production for the surveyed sites.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Simpson, D. (2014) Pneumatic Controllers in Upstream Oil and Gas. Oil and Gas Facilities, 3, 83-96.
[2]	U.S. EPA. (2016) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 - 2014, U.S. EPA 430-R-16-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks-1990-2014
[3]	Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association. (2014) Pneumatic Controller Emissions from a Sample of 172 Production Facilities. http://www.oipa.com/page_images/1418911081.pdf
[4]	Allen, D.T., Torres, V.M., Thomas, J., Sullivan, D.W., Harrison, M., Hendler, A., Herndon, S.C., Kolb, C.E., Fraser, M.P., Hill, A.D., Lamb, B.K., Miskimins, J., Sawyer, R.F. and Seinfeld, J.H. (2013) Measurements of CH4 Emissions at Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 17768-17773. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304880110
[5]	Allen, D.T., Pacsi, A.P., Sullivan, D.W., Zavala-Araiza, D., Harrison, M., Keen, K., Fraser, M.P., Hill, A.D., Sawyer, R.F. and Seinfeld, J.H. (2014) Methane Emissions from Process Equipment at Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States: Pneumatic Controllers. Environmental Science & Technology, 49, 633-640. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5040156
[6]	Prasino Group. (2013) Determining Bleed Rates for Pneumatic Devices in British Columbia. http://www.bcogris.ca/sites/default/files/ei-2014-01-final-report20140131.pdf
[7]	U.S. EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway, 2016 Uinta Basin Pneumatic Controller Study, https://edg.epa.gov/metadata/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7BB23A5E35-2F69-490F-A043-0B191DCADD18%7D, and U.S. Data.Gov https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/2016-uinta-basin-pneumatic-controller-study-database
[8]	United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40 Section 98.233, Calculating GHG Emissions, Appendix Table W-1A.
[9]	U.S. EPA. (2016) 40 CFR Part 60 Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources; [EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0505; FRL–9944–75–OAR] RIN 2060–AS30. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-06-03/pdf/2016-11971.pdf
[10]	U.S. EPA. (2015) Technical Support Document Optical Gas Imaging Protocol (40 CFR Part 60, Appendix K). 40 CFR 60, EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505-4949. https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505-4949
[11]	Touché, H., Ferrara, T.W. and Townsend-Small, A. (2015) Sensor Transition Failure in the High Flow Sampler: Implications for CH4 Emission Inventories of Natural Gas Infrastructure. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 65, 856-862. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1025925
[12]	Brantley, H. L., Thoma, E. D., and Eisele, A.P. (2015) Assessment of Volatile Organic Compound and Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas Well Pads Using Mobile Remote and on-Site Direct Measurements. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 65, 1072-1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2015.1056888
[13]	Touché, H. (2015) Comment on Methane Emissions from Process Equipment at Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States: Pneumatic Controllers. Environmental Science & Technology, 49, 3981-3982. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00507
[14]	U.S. EPA. (1999) Compendium Method TO-14A—Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) In Ambient Air Using Specially Prepared Canisters with Subsequent Analysis by Gas Chromatography. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www3.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/airtox/to-14ar.pdf
[15]	U.S. EPA. (2013) Method 18—Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound Emissions by Gas Chromatography using EPA ALT100. US Environmental Protection Agency. https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/emc/approalt/ALT100.pdf
[16]	R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.