[1]
|
Albert, E. (1978). Development of the concept of heat in children. Science Education, 62, 389-399. doi:10.1002/sce.3730620316
|
[2]
|
Azaiza, I., Bar, V., & Galili, I. (2006). Learning about electricity in elementary school. International Journal of Science & Mathematics, 4, 45-71.
|
[3]
|
Baker, D., & Taylor, P. C. S. (1995). The effect of culture on the learning of science in non-western cultures: The results of integrated research review. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 695- 704. doi:10.1080/0950069950170602
|
[4]
|
Bar, V. (1989). Children’s ideas about the water cycle. Science Education, 73, 481-500. doi:10.1002/sce.3730730409
|
[5]
|
Bar, V., & Galili, I. (1994) Stages of children’s views about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 157-174.
doi:10.1080/0950069940160205
|
[6]
|
Bar, V., & Travis, S. A. (1991). Children’s views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 363-382.
doi:10.1002/tea.3660280409
|
[7]
|
Ba?er, M., & Geban, O. (2007). Effect of instruction based on concepttual change activities on students’ understanding of static electricity concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25, 243 - 267. doi:10.1080/02635140701250857
|
[8]
|
Bensegire, A., & Closset, J. L. (1996). The electrostatic electro kinetic transition: Instructionaland educational difficulties. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 179-191.
doi:10.1080/0950069960180204
|
[9]
|
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93, 26-55.
doi:10.1002/sce.20286
|
[10]
|
Borges, T. A., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999). Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 95-117.
doi:10.1080/095006999290859
|
[11]
|
Caillot, M. (2002). Student relationship to knowledge and science. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Science Education (pp. 384-391). Nicosia: The Cyprus Pedagogical Institute.
|
[12]
|
Chambers, K. S., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 107-123.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<107::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X
|
[13]
|
Cohen, R., Eylon, B., & Ganiel, U. (1983). Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts. American Journal of Physics, 51, 407-412. doi:10.1119/1.13226
|
[14]
|
Dresler, T., Razial, S., & Einav, R. (1991). Electric generator. Hebrew: Israel Ministry of Education.
|
[15]
|
Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (Eds.) (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
|
[16]
|
Dupin, J. J., & Johsua, S. (1987). Conceptions of French pupils concerning electric circuits: Structure and evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 791-806. doi:10.1002/tea.3660240903
|
[17]
|
Eylon, B. S., & Ganiel, U. (1990). Macro-micro relationships: The missing link between electrostatics and electrodynamics in students’ reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 79-94.
doi:10.1080/0950069900120107
|
[18]
|
Galili, I., & Bar, V. (2008). The neglected concept of insulator in teaching electricity in elementary school. Proceedings of the International Conference on Physics Education (GIREP): Physics Curriculum Design, Development and Validation, Nicosia: The University of Nicosia.
|
[19]
|
Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learner’s knowledge in optics: Interpretation structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 57-88. doi:10.1080/095006900290000
|
[20]
|
Gauld, C.F. (1988). The cognitive context of pupils’ alternative frameworks. Internatioal Journal of Science Education, 10, 267 -274.
doi:10.1080/0950069880100303
|
[21]
|
Glasson, G. E., Frykholm, J. A., Mahango, N. A., & Phiri, D. A. (2006). Understanding the earth systems of Malawi: Ecological sustainability, culture, and place-based education. Science Education, 90, 660-680.
doi:10.1002/sce.20148
|
[22]
|
Guisasola, J. (2008). Designing and evaluation a research-based teaching sequence for electrical capacitance. Proceedings of the International Conference on Physics Education (GIREP): Physics Curriculum Design, Development and Validation, Nicosia: The University of Nicosia.
|
[23]
|
Heller, P., & Finley, F. (1992). Variable uses of alternative conceptions —A case study in current electricity. JRST, 29, 259-276.
|
[24]
|
Hewitt, P. G. (2001). Conceptual physics: The high school physics program. Taipei: Commonwealth Publishing Co.
|
[25]
|
K?rrqvist, C. (1985). Physics teachers’ perceptions of the difficulty of teaching electricity. Research in Science Education, 39, 515-538.
|
[26]
|
Koren, P. (2006). The image of the scientist in students’ ideas. Ph.D. thesis, Hebrew: Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
|
[27]
|
Kuhn, L. B., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93, 26-55.
doi:10.1002/sce.20286
|
[28]
|
Lee, K. W. L. (1999). Particulate representation of a chemical reaction mechanism. Research in Science Teaching, 29, 401-415.
|
[29]
|
Lee, S. J. (2007). Exploring students’ understanding concerning batteries—Theories and practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 497-516. doi:10.1080/09500690601073350
|
[30]
|
Lee, S. J., & Chang, L. Y. (2001). Primary school pupils’ alternative conceptions on battery theory and practice. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 9, 253-280.
|
[31]
|
Levinger, M., & Dresler, T. (1993). With the current. Hebrew: Israel ministry of education.
|
[32]
|
Niedderer, H., & Goldberg, F. (1987). Qualitative Interpretation of learning process in electric circuits. NARST Annual Meeting 1993, Atlanta, 11-15 April 1993.
|
[33]
|
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173469
|
[34]
|
Novick, S., & Nusbaum, J. (1978). Junior high school pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter—An interview study. Science Education, 62, 273-281. doi:10.1002/sce.3730620303
|
[35]
|
Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2010). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1-22.
|
[36]
|
Osborne, R. J. (1981). Children’s ideas about electric current. New Zealand Science Teacher, 29, 12-19. doi:10.1080/0263514830010108
|
[37]
|
Osborne, R. J. (1983). Towards modifying children’s ideas about electric current. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1, 73-82.
|
[38]
|
Pardhan H., & Bano, Y. (2008). Pre-service and in-service physics teachers’ ideas about simple electric circuits. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4, 303-311.
|
[39]
|
Park, J. (2001). Analysis of students’ processes of confirmation and falsification of their prior ideas about electrostatics. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1219-1236.
doi:10.1080/09500690110049097
|
[40]
|
Piaget, J. (2008). The child’s conception of the world. Lanham: Roman & Littlefield publishers.
|
[41]
|
Piaget, J. (1930). The child’s conception of physical causality. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace & company.
|
[42]
|
Reif, F., & Larkin, J. H. (1992). Cognition in scientific and everyday domains: Comparison and learning implications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 733-760. doi:10.1002/tea.3660280904
|
[43]
|
Sharma, A. (2008). Making electrical connections: Exploring student agency in a school in India. Science Education, 92, 297-319
doi:10.1002/sce.20246
|
[44]
|
Shen, J., & Linn, M. (2010). A technology-enhanced unit of modeling static electricity: Integrating scientific explanations and everyday observations. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1-27.
doi:10.1080/09500690802412449
|
[45]
|
Shepardson, D. P., & Moje, E. B. (1999). The role of anomalous data in restructuring fourth graders’ frameworks for understanding electric circuits. International Journal of science Education, 21, 77-94.
doi:10.1080/095006999290840
|
[46]
|
Shipstone, D. M. (1984). A study of children understanding simple DC circuits. European Journal of Science Education, 6, 185-198.
doi:10.1080/0140528840060208
|
[47]
|
Shipstone, D. M. (1985). On childrens’ use of conceptual models in reasoning about current electricity. In R. Duit, W. Jung, C. von Rh?neck (Eds.), Aspect of Understanding Electricity (pp. 73-83). Keil: Schmidt & Klaunig.
|
[48]
|
Smolkin, L. B., McTigue, E. M., Donovan, C. A., & Coleman, J. M. (2009). Explanation in science trade books recommended for use with elementary students. Science Education, 93, 587-610.
doi:10.1002/sce.20313
|
[49]
|
Solomon, J., Black, P., Oldham, V., & Stuart, H. (1985). The pupils’ view of electricity. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 281- 294. doi:10.1080/0140528850070306
|
[50]
|
Stocklmayer, S. M., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Images of electricity, how do novice and experts model electric current. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 163-178.
doi:10.1080/0950069960180203
|
[51]
|
Tiberghien, A., & Delacote, G. (1976). Manipulation of the presentation of electric circuits among young children, aged 7-12 years. Revue Fran?oise de Pedagogy, 34, 32-44.
|
[52]
|
Tobin, K. (1993). Constructivism: The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington: AAAS.
|
[53]
|
Wolf, A. (1961). A history of science, technology and philosophy in the 18th century. New York: Harper.
|