Do Anthropometric Measures Influence Torso Muscle Endurance Profiles of Children Aged 7 to 14?

Aleksandar Dejanovic, Erin Harvey, Jordan Andersen, Stuart McGill

University of Novi Pazar, Department of Biochemical and Medicine Science, Novi Sad, Serbia.
University of Waterloo, Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Waterloo, Canada.
University of Waterloo, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Faculty of Mathematics, Waterloo,Canada.

DOI: 10.4236/ape.2012.24032                

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether torso endurance scores were linked with anthropometric variables in children and to develop a normative scale of anthropometric measures in children in both genders for clinical assessment, rehabilitation, physical education targets and young athletic training purposes. It was hypothesized that changes in anthropometric measures through ages 7 to 14 influence endurance scores in both subsets. It was also hypothesized that boys and girls differ in the relationships between torso muscle endurance and anthropometric measures. Reduced torso muscle endurance has been identified as a potential personal risk factor for developing low back pain and decreased athletic performance. However, torso muscle endurance data in children is lacking. Further, given that endurance tests require postures where the body is supported horizontally, it makes sense that anthropometric variables would influence endurance. Isometric torso muscle endurance scores established through four tests were performed in random order by healthy children. These were correlated with anthropometric dimensions. Seven hundred and fifty-three children from one elementary school (394 boys and 359 girls) were grouped into 8 age strata (7 to 14). Each age stratum had different number of participants for boys and girls. Four tests established isometric torso muscle endurance: Biering-Sorensen test for extensor endurance, flexor endurance test and right and left side bridge tests. The mean, standard deviation of the endurance tests and anthropometric measures were determined for each gender/age strata. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were determined between the anthropometric dimensions and isometric torso endurance scores for each gender/age strata. Variance in endurance scores were not well explained by anthropometric measures. Variables other than segment length and circumference influence torso endurance as children grow and develop. Given links to future back pain and athletic performance, more investigation would be justified.

Keywords

Anthropometric Measures; Torso Muscle Endurance Tests; Correlation; Children

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Alaranta, H., Hurri, H., Heliovaara, M., Soukka, A., & Harju, R. (1994). Non-dynamometric trunk performance tests: Reliability and normative data. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 26, 211-215.
[2]	Biering-Sorensen, F. (1984). Physical measurements as physical risk indicators for low back trouble over a one-year period. Spine, 9, 106-119.
[3]	Dejanovic, A. (2006). Relacije antropometrijskih karakteristika i izometrijskog mi?i?nog potencijala u lumbalnoj i abdominalnoj regiji kod dece (Relations of anthropometric characteristics and isometric muscular potential in lumbar and abdominal region in children). Novi Sad: University of Novi Pazar.
[4]	Dejanovic, A., Harvey, E., & McGill, S. (2012). Changes in torso muscle endurance profiles in children aged 7 to 14 years: Reference values. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, in Press.
[5]	Docherty, D., & Gaul, C. A. (1991). Relationship of body size, physique, and composition to physical performance in young boys and girls. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 12, 525-532. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1024728
[6]	Evans, K., Refshauge, K., & Adams, R. (2007). Trunk muscle endurance tests: Reliability, and gender differences in athletes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 10, 447-455. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2006.09.003
[7]	Everett, P. W., & Sills, F. W. (1952). The relationship of grip strength to stature, somatotype components and anthropometric measurements of the hand. Research Quarterly, 23, 161-166.
[8]	Gabbard, C. P., & Patterson, P. E. (1980). Relationship and comparison of selected anthropometric measures to muscular endurance and strength in children aged 3 5 years. Annals of Human Biology, 7, 583-586. doi:10.1080/03014468000004701
[9]	Johnson, B. (1925). Mental growth of children in relation to the rate of the growth in bodily development. A report of the Bureau of educational experiments. New York, NY: Dalton.
[10]	Jürim?e, T., & Jürim?e, J. (2000). Growth, physical activity, and motor development in prepubertal children. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[11]	Kankaanp??, M., Laaksonen, D., Taimela, S., Kokko, S. M., Airaksinen, O., & H?nninen, O. (1998). Age, sex, and body mass index as determinants of back and hip extensor fatigue in the isometric Sorensen back endurance test. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 1069-1075. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90173-3
[12]	Lohman, T. G., Roche, A. F., & Martorell, R. (1988). Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Chicago, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
[13]	Mannion, A. F., Dumas, G. A., Cooper, R. G., Espinosa, F. J., Faris, M. W., & Setevenson, J. M. (1997). Muscle fiber size and type distribution in thoracic and lumbar regions of erector spinae in healthy subjects with no low back pain: Normal values and gender differences. Journal of Anatomy, 190, 505-513. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19040505.x
[14]	Marras, W. S., Davis, K. G., Ferguson, S. A., Lucas, B., R., & Gupta, P. (2001). Spine loading characteristics of patients with low back pain compared with asymptomatic individuals. Spine, 26, 2566-2574. doi:10.1097/00007632-200112010-00009
[15]	McGill, S. M., Childs, A., & Liebenson, C. (1999). Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: Clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 941-944. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90087-4
[16]	McIntosh, J. E., Bogduk, N., & Pearcy, M. J. (1993). The effects of flexion on the geometry and actions of the lumbar erector spine. Spine, 18, 884-893. doi:10.1097/00007632-199306000-00013
[17]	Metheny, E. (1941). The present status of strength testing for children of elementary school and preschool age. Research Quarterly, 12, 115-130.
[18]	Rarick, L. G., & Dobbins, D. A. (1975). Basic components in the motor performance of children 6 - 9 years of age. Medicine and Science in Sports, 7, 105-110. doi:10.1249/00005768-197500720-00017
[19]	Salminen, J., Maki, P., Oksanen, A., & Pentti, J. (1992). Spinal mobility and trunk muscle strength in 15-year-old schoolchildren with and without low-back pain. Spine, 17, 405-411. doi:10.1097/00007632-199204000-00005
[20]	Slaughter, M. H., Lohman, T. G., & Misner, J. E. (1977). Relationship of somatotype and body composition to physical performance in 7- to 12-year-old boys. Research Quarterly, 48, 159-168.
[21]	Tichauer, E. R. (1978). The biomechanical basis of ergonomics: Anatomy applied to the design of work stations. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
[22]	Tveit, P., Daggfeldt, K., Hetland, S., & Thorstensson, A. (1994). Erector spinae lever arm length variations with changes in spinal curvature. Spine, 19, 199-204. doi:10.1097/00007632-199401001-00015
[23]	Xiao, G., Lei, L., Demspey, P. G., Lu, B., & Liang, Y. (2005). Isometric muscle strength and anthropometric characteristics of a Chinese sample. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 674-679. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2005.02.003