The Relationship between Institutional Efficiency and Instructional Quality in Higher Education


Wage setting methodologies for university faculty may be merit/market based or administered. Failure to exploit the fact that faculty productivity depends on abilities and wages results in inefficient use of university budgets. If such inefficiencies exist it suggests suboptimal productivity of the existing faculty and the inability to attract new qualified faculty. As motivation for this analysis, a simple model of university faculty “output” maximization is presented. Efficient budget allocation requires that faculty compensation be structured so that marginal productivities are equated across faculty. This paper examines and compares the efficiency of several regional universities in the US, identified as “peers”, employing the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) estimation method. The results suggest the existence of inefficiencies and more notably, that the homogeneity assumption regarding the peers is questionable.

Share and Cite:

Rassouli-Currier, S. (2012) The Relationship between Institutional Efficiency and Instructional Quality in Higher Education. Creative Education, 3, 224-227. doi: 10.4236/ce.2012.32035.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K., &Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21-38. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
[2] Alexander, F. K. (2001). The silent crisis: The relative fiscal capacity of public universities to compete for faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 24, 113-129.
[3] Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., & Battese, G. E. (1998). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5493-6
[4] Cohn, E. (1973). Factors affecting variations in faculty salaries and compensation in institutions of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 44, 124-136. doi:10.2307/1980571
[5] Faculty Compensation Systems Used in Higher Education (2001). ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 28, 15-24.
[6] Hoenack, S. A. (1982). Pricing and efficiency in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 53, 403-418. doi:10.2307/1981606
[7] Kumbhakar, Subal C., & Wang, H.-J. (2006).Estimation of technical and allocative inefficiency: A primal system approach. Journal of Econometrics, 134, 419-440. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.001
[8] Rassouli-Currier, S., & Currier, K. (2008). Inefficiency in higher: An empirical application to peer regional universities. Southwestern Economic Review: Research Notes.
[9] Smallwood, S. (2006). Faculty salaries rise by 3.4%; Law professors still earn the most. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52, A12.
[10] Talluri, S. (2000). Data envelopment analysis: Models and extensions. Decision Line, 31, 8-11.
[11] Tuckman, B. H., & Tuckman, H. P. (1976). The structure of salaries at american universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 47, 51-64. doi:10.2307/1978713

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.