A Closed-Form Formulation for the Build-Up Factor and Absorbed Energy for Photons and Electrons in the Compton Energy Range in Cartesian Geometry ()

Volnei Borges, Julio Cesar Fernandes, Bardo Ernest Bodmann, Marco Túllio Vilhena, Bárbara Rodriguez

**DOI: **10.4236/wjnst.2012.21004
PDF
HTML
5,674
Downloads
9,232
Views
Citations

In this work, we report on a closed-form formulation for the build-up factor and absorbed energy, in one and two di- mensional Cartesian geometry for photons and electrons, in the Compton energy range. For the one-dimensional case we use the LTSN method, assuming the Klein-Nishina scattering kernel for the determination of the angular radiation intensity for photons. We apply the two-dimensional LTSN nodal solution for the averaged angular radiation evaluation for the two-dimensional case, using the Klein-Nishina kernel for photons and the Compton kernel for electrons. From the angular radiation intensity we construct a closed-form solution for the build-up factor and evaluate the absorbed energy. We present numerical simulations and comparisons against results from the literature.

Share and Cite:

V. Borges, J. Fernandes, B. Bodmann, M. Vilhena and B. Rodriguez, "A Closed-Form Formulation for the Build-Up Factor and Absorbed Energy for Photons and Electrons in the Compton Energy Range in Cartesian Geometry," *World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology*, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2012, pp. 23-28. doi: 10.4236/wjnst.2012.21004.

1. Introduction

In radiological protection the effectiveness of a material as a biological shield is related to its cross-section for scattering and absorption which is cast into physical parameters. The determination of those parameters require the solution of a systems of linear transport equations, i.e. the fluence for photons and electrons. Established methods that solve the transport equations are the PN approximation [1], the discrete ordinate method and their variants [2]. The S_{N} method has been used successfully in photon transport calculation, whereas recently the P_{N} approximation was applied to electron transport. In this work we present the solution of a couple system of linear transport equations, using the LTS_{N} method for a rectangular domain considering the Klein-Nishina scattering kernel and a multi-group model for photons. The electron contribution to energy deposition induced by incident photons is quantified solving the two-dimensional Fokker-Planck equation for electron transport [3,4] by the P_{N} approximation in the angular variable followed by applying the Laplace Transform to one of the spatial variables (here x). This procedure leads to a closed-form formulation for the build-up factor and absorbed energy, in one and two dimensional Cartesian geometry for photons and electrons, in the energy range where Compton scattering is dominant [5].

2. The LTS_{N} Nodal Solution in Two Dimensional for Photons

The two-dimensional S_{N} nodal problem for photons, assuming Klein-Nishina scattering kernel and a multi-group model is

(1)

subject to vacuum boundary conditions in a rectangle and. Where n = 1, , N; is the cardinality of the discrete ordinate set, M represents the order of the angular quadrature, G is the number of energy groups in units of wavelengths, is the linear attenuation coefficient,

is the angular flux into the discrete direction for the j-th energy group, are the Lewis-Miller quadrature weights and is the Klein-Nishina scattering kernel, defined as

(2)

The LTS_{N} nodal approach for photons yields the following S_{N} equation system

(3)

For and. Here and are the angular fluxes at the boundary edges with and the average angular flux is

(4)

Further,

(5)

For and N. In Equation (5), and are the angular fluxes at the boundary edges with y = 0, y = b and the average angular flux is

(6)

Application of the LTS_{N} method consists in Laplace transform of the set of S_{N} equations and solving the resulting algebraic equations by matrix diagonalization and subsequent inversion of the transformed angular flux by standard procedures of integral transform theory. The Laplace transform of Equation (3) is

(7)

For and which can be cast in matrix form,

(8)

Here, are the N componentes of the Laplace transformed angular flux in the y variable and are the respective components of the angular flux at the edge y = 0. The components have the following forms,

(9)

and

(10)

The components of the matrix are given by,

The scattering term is,

(11)

with the components of matrix H_{ij} (see the equation below).

The vector has the components,

(12)

A similar methodology in the x variable leads to the linear algebric system which can be matrix form,

(13)

where has the following form,

(14)

The matrix elements of are,

and the scattering term is

(15)

where the matrix elements of are given

and the vector is

(16)

The LTS_{N} solution for Equations (8) and (16) are given by

(17)

and

(18)

Taking the Laplace inversion by applying the Heaviside expansion yields

(19)

and

(20)

For the fluxes at boundary one may use reasonable approximation [6]

(21)

(22)

(23)

(24)

Here the signal function follows the usual definition for and for and represents an attenuation parameter, here the macroscopic absorption crosssection.

The generalization of the LTS_{N} nodal solution for a heterogeneous rectangular geometry assuming the Klein-Nishina scattering kernel and a multi-group model may be implemented in a completely analogue procedure. In such a problem the LTS_{N} solution is determined for each subdomain and the integration constants are evaluated upon applying the boundary and interface.

3. The Two-Dimensional Fokker-Planck Equation Solution for Electrons

The purpose of radiation transport is to determine how particles move through materials and what effects their propagation have on the material through the mechanisms of deposited energy and charge deposition. The angular flux of electrons in a rectangular domain can be determined by solving the following two-dimensional, time independent electron transport equation, in a rectangle and, subject to vacuum boundary conditions.

(25)

Here, the angular flux, represents the flux of particles at position (x, y), with energy E travelling in direction. The quantity in Equation (25) is the differential scattering cross-section, in this work, we focus on screened Rutherford scattering which is

(26)

where is typically a small constant called the screening parameter parameter is given by

(27)

with Z the atomic number of the nucleus, mv the relativistic momentum of the scattered electron and

(28)

which is Planck’s constant and is the Bohr radius.

We assume that the Fokker-Planck (FP) scattering description is appropriate, so that the transport problem (25) is given by,

(29)

Here the coefficient is he transport cross-sectionand defined as,

(30)

Upon multiplying Equation (29) by, integrating over and using the recursion formula, as well as general properties of Legendre polynomials leads to the following P_{N} equations

(31)

The angular flux moments in discrete ordinates may be expressed using a quadrature approximation,

(32)

For with in the P_{N} approximation and T_{n} represented by an integral term which can be solved analytically,

(33)

After applying the Laplace transform in Equation (31) in the spatial variable x, we came out with the linear algebric system,

(34)

For and where and are the transformed angular fluxes in the spatial x variable. Equation (36) can be cast in matrix form,

(35)

where are the N components of the derivative of the Laplace transformed angular flux in the x variable.

(36)

The components of matrices and C_{N} are for, respectively

The solution of Equation (35) is

(37)

where is an arbitrary constant determined by applying the boundary and interface conditions. Due to the linear character of the inverse Laplace transform operator, the solution is composed by

(38)

4. Numerical Results

In the following we apply the closed-form formulation to the build-up factor and absorbed energy for photons and electrons in the Compton energy range and in Cartesian geometry. Moreover, we the one-dimensional, two-dimensional problem for photons and two-dimensional problem for photons and electrons. To this end we evaluate the exposure build-up factor, considering a scalar flux of the photons with energy 1 MeV, incident in a multi-layered slab with two regions, composed of water and lead, water and iron, lead and iron. Assuming that the kernel is described by the Klein-Nishina differential scattering crosssection and the energy variables may be simplified in form of a multi-group model in the wavelength (energy) variable.

Here the exposure build-up factor is defined as the sum of the product of the attenuation coefficient of the air with the scalar flux for all photons, including the incident flux, divided by the attenuation coefficient of the air for the incident flux multiplied by the incident scalar flux. The numerical results for three problems are shown in Table 1 for water and lead, in Table 2 for water and iron and in Table 3 for lead and iron. In Table 1 we present the LTS_{N} numerical simulations for the exposure build-up factor and comparisons with results from the EGS_{4} code [7] generated for the one-group model. We consider a multi-layered slab with two regions, composed of water (μ_{ij} = 0.0707 cm^{2}/g and 1.0 mpf) and lead (μ_{ij} = 0.06848 cm^{2}/g and depth in multiples of the mean free path, 4.0, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 30.0 and 40.0 mfp) together with the afore mentioned vacuum boundary conditions.

Table 1. Numerical exposure buildup factor simulations for a multilayered slab composed of water (1.0 mfp) and lead.

Table 2. Numerical exposure buildup factor simulations for a multilayered slab composed of water (1.0 mfp) and iron.

Table 3. Numerical exposure buildup factor simulations for a multilayered slab composed of lead (1.0 mfp) and iron.

In Table 2 we present the LTS_{N} numerical simulations for the exposure build-up factor and comparisons with the results from EGS_{4} generated for the one-group model. We consider a multi-layered slab with two regions, composed of water (μ_{ij} = 0.0707 cm^{2}/g with depth of 1.0 mpf) and iron (μ_{ij} = 0.0596 cm^{2}/g with depth 4.0, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 30.0 and 40.0 mfp) and vacuum boundary conditions.

From the analysis of the results encountered in Tables 1-3, one realizes a fairly good agreement between the LTS_{16} and EGS_{4} results. The numerical convergence of the LTS_{N} results showed for increasing N a coincidence of six significant digits for N = 14 and N = 16. For two-dimensional problems for photons and electrons, we applied the LTS_{N} method, for N = 8, in the transport equation for photons and used N = 9 in the P_{N} approximation for the angular variable of the Fokker-Planck equation for electrons. We considered homogeneous rectangular geometries composed of water liquid (Z/A = 0.55508, ρ = 1 g/cm^{2}), soft tissue (ICRU44, Z/A = 0.54996, ρ = 1.06 g/cm^{2}) and cortical bone (ICRU44, Z/A = 0.51478, ρ = 1.92 g/cm^{2}). Further, we assumed a mono-energetic (E = 1.25 MeV) and monodirectional photon beam incident on the edge of a rectangle with dimension 20 cm × 20 cm and vacuum boundary conditions. The incoming photons were tracked until their whole energy was deposited and/ or they left the domain of interest. In this problem also the energy deposited by the secondary electrons, generated by the Compton Effect, were considered. Other possible effects, however with small or spurious contributions were not taken into account. The numerical results encountered for absorbed energy in the domain were compared with simulations obtained with the program Geant4 v8 [8], using the low energy libraries and are presented in Tables 4 and 5.

The numerical convergence of the LTS_{N} results showed for increasing N a coincidence of three significant digits for N = 4, 6 and 8. Notice, the coincidence of four significant digits for the P_{N} approximation with N = 7 and 9. These results were obtained in the homogeneous domain with dimension 20 cm × 20 cm that was composed of water. In Table 4 we present the LTS_{8} nodal numerical simulations for the absorbed energy induced by photons incident on a homogeneous rectangular domain, that is composed of a variety of different materials. In Table 5 we present numerical simulations for absorbed energy by the P_{9} approximation, due to free electrons, arising from Compton scattering in a homogeneous rectangular domain composed of different materials. These results were compared with simulations obtained by Geant4.

In spite of the fact, that two different methods were used to simulate energy deposition, the Monte Carlo method with Geant4 and our closed form solution the results in Tables 4 and 5 show a fairly good agreement. From the results, we notice that the maximum discrepancy found is 3.4% in the simulations for photons and 8.3% for electrons. The difference of our numerical results in comparison to the Geant simulations, that contain a catalogue of processes, demonstrate that other effects shall be taken into account. As the material density increases, the

Table 4. Absorved energy (KeV/photon emitted from the source) by the photons incident in a homogeneous domain dimension 20 cm × 20 cm, composed of materials different.

Table 5. Absorved energy (KeV/photon emitted from the source) by the free electrons in a homogeneous domain dimension 20 cm × 20 cm, composed of materials different.

number of interactions increases as well as the possibility of other production processes involving secondary electrons, responsible for more than 86% of the total energy absorbed in domain.

5. Conclusion

Concluding, we were successful in determinig the LTS_{N} solution in closed form forenergy deposition induced by photons in Cartesian geometry. From the solution we obtained the buildup factor and absorbed energy, for photons and electrons, in the Compton energy range. It is worth mentioning, that the LTS_{N} procedure maintains an analytical character of the solution and the unique approximation made was in the leakage angular flux at the boundary. The P_{N} solution of the Fokker-Planck equation remains analytical in the sense that no approximation is made along its derivation from P_{N} equations, except for the truncation. Finally, a variety of additional numerical experiments have shown us that the presented method is robust for problems of the considered transport equation type.

6. Acknowledgements

The authors are gratefully to CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for the partial financial support of this work. A special acknowledgment for the project INCT (Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia—Reatores Nucleares Inovadores) for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

[1] | C. F. Segatto, M. T. Vilhena and R. P. Pazos, “On the Con- vergence of the Spherical Harmonics Approximations,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 1, 2000, pp. 114-119. |

[2] | M. T. Vilhena, C. F. Segatto and L. B. Barichello, “A Par- ticular Solution for the SN Radiative Transfer Problems,” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Tran- sfer, Vol. 53, No. 4, 1995, pp. 467-469. doi:10.1016/0022-4073(95)90020-9 |

[3] | C. Borges and E. W. Larsen, “The Transversely Inte- grated Scalar Flux of a Narrowly Focused Particle Beam,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 55, No. 1, 1995, pp. 1-22. |

[4] | C. Borges and E. W. Larsen, “On the Accuracy of the Fokker-Planck and Fermi Pencil Beam Equation for Charged Particle Transport,” Medical Physics, Vol. 23, No. 10, 1996, pp. 1749-1759. doi:10.1118/1.597832 |

[5] | B. D. A. Rodriguez, M. T. Vilhena, V. Borges and G. Hoff, “A Closed Form Solution for the Two-Dimensional Fokker-Planck Equation for Electron Transport in the Range of Compton Effect,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 35, No. 5, 2008, pp. 958-962. doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2007.09.002 |

[6] | B. D. A. Rodriguez, M. T. Vilhena and V. Borges, “A So- lution for the Two-Dimensional Transport Equation for Photons and Electrons in a Rectangular Domain by the Laplace Transform Technique,” International Journal of Nuclear Energy Science and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2010, pp. 25-40. doi:10.1504/IJNEST.2010.030304 |

[7] | H. Hirayama and K. Shin, “Application of the EGS4 Monte Carlo Code to a Study of Multilayer Gamma-Ray Expo- sure Buildup Factors,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 35, No. 11, p. 816. doi:10.3327/jnst.35.816 |

[8] | D. H. Wright, “Physics Reference Manual,” 2001. http://cern.ch/geant4 |

[9] | G. C. Pomraning, “Flux-Limited Diffusion and Fokker- Planck Equations,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 85, No. 2, 1983, p. 116. |

[10] | J. Wood, “Computational Methods in Reactor Shielding,” Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982. |

[11] | S. Agostinelli, et al., “Geant4: A Simulation Toolkit,” Nu- clear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, Vol. 506, No. 3, 2003, pp. 250-303. |

[12] | DOORS 3.1, “One, Two and Three Dimensional Discrete Ordinates Neutron Photon Transport Code System,” Ra- diation Safety Information Computational Center (RSICC), Code Package CCC-650, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1996. |

[13] | B. D. A. Rodriguez, M. T. Vilhena and V. Borges, “The Determination of the Exposure Buildup Factor Formula- tion in a Slab Using the LTSN Method,” Kerntechnik, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2006, pp. 182-184. |

Journals Menu

Contact us

+1 323-425-8868 | |

customer@scirp.org | |

+86 18163351462(WhatsApp) | |

1655362766 | |

Paper Publishing WeChat |

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.