Practicing What We Preach: How Are Admissions Decisions Made for Clinical Psychology Graduate Programs, and What Do Students Need to Know?
Travis J. Pashak, Paul J. Handal, Megan Ubinger
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2012.31001   PDF    HTML     6,826 Downloads   12,449 Views   Citations


As the application process to Clinical Psychology graduate programs becomes increasingly competitive, applicants and advisors have a need to know what to expect. The aim of this article is to provide a brief overview of the application process, an examination of characteristics of admission committees’ criteria and selection policies, and an analysis of differences among and between programs of different types. Programs offering doctoral degrees in clinical psychology (n = 59) were surveyed regarding their admissions procedures and criteria, and the results are discussed in light of what impacts applicants. Findings suggest that policies and procedures are mixed, that important differences exist between Ph.D. programs and Psy.D. programs, and that programs generally follow an assessment model in their selection decisions.

Share and Cite:

Pashak, T. , Handal, P. & Ubinger, M. (2012). Practicing What We Preach: How Are Admissions Decisions Made for Clinical Psychology Graduate Programs, and What Do Students Need to Know?. Psychology, 3, 1-6. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.31001.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] American Psychological Association (2011). Graduate study in psychology 2011. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
[2] Baker, D. B., & Benjamin, L. T. Jr. (2000). The affirmation of the scientist-practitioner: A look back at Boulder. American Psychologist, 55, 241-247.
[3] Bureau of Labor Statistics (2011). Psychologists. In Occupational outlook handbook, 2010-11 Edition. Retrieved from
[4] Educational Testing Service. (2011). Sending your scores. In GRE general test. Retrieved from
[5] Matarazzo, J. D. (1990). Psychological assessment versus psychological testing: Validation from Binet to the school, clinic and courtroom. American Psychologist, 45, 999-1017. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.9.999
[6] Norcross, J. C., Ellis, J. L., &Sayette, M. A. (2010). Getting in and getting money: A comparative analysis of admission standards, acceptance rates, and financial assistance across the research-practice continuum in clinical psychology programs. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4, 99-104. doi:10.1037/a0014880
[7] Norcross, J. C., Kohout, J. L., &Wicherski, M. (2006). Graduate study in psychology: 1971 to 2004. American Psychologist, 60, 959-975. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.959
[8] Peterson, D. R. (1997). Need for the doctor of psychology degree in professional psychology. In Peterson, D. R. (Ed.), Educating professional psychologists: History and guiding conception (pp. 65-75). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10229-004
[9] Sayette, M. A., Mayne, T. J., & Norcross, J. C. (2010). Insider’s guide to graduate programs in clinical and counseling psychology. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.