Share This Article:

Aristotle’s Definition of Place and of Matter

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:32KB) PP. 35-36
DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2011.11006    17,000 Downloads   33,569 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment


The accuracy of Aristotle’s definition of place is defended in terms of his form-matter theory. This theory is in turn defended against the objectionable notion that it entails matter is ultimately characterless.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Drum, P. (2011). Aristotle’s Definition of Place and of Matter. Open Journal of Philosophy, 1, 35-36. doi: 10.4236/ojpp.2011.11006.


[1] Aristotle (1952). On generation and corruption. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), H. H. Joachim (Translate), The works of Aristotle volume 1 (pp. 407-441). Chicago, IL: William Benton.
[2] Aristotle (1952). Physics. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye (Translate), The works of Aristotle volume 1 (pp. 257-355). Chicago, IL: William Benton.
[3] Cohen, S. (1996). Aristotle on nature and incomplete substance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[4] Lewis, F. A. (2008). What’s the matter with prime matter?. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 34, 123-146.
[5] Sorabji, R. (1988). Matter, Space and Motion. London: Duckworth.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.