A Chart of Conversion Supporting EPR Paradox vs. Bell’s Inequalities Violation

Olivier Serret

Cugnaux, France.

DOI: 10.4236/jmp.2015.613201                

Abstract

Quantum Mechanics formalism remains difficult to understand and sometimes is confusing, especially in the explanation of ERP paradox and of Bell’s inequalities with entanglement photons. So a chart of conversion, in which elements are named differently, is proposed. Next, experiment about Bell’s inequalities violation is described in another way, and we hope a clearer one. Main result is Bell’s inequalities would not be violated! The explanation would come from confusion between the definition of the correlation function S1, and a property S2. And consequently, Einstein, Podolski and Rosen would be right on the local “hidden” variable.

Keywords

Quantum Mechanics, Correlation Function, Correlation Coefficient, Total Correlation, EPR, Einstein-Podolski-Rosen Paradox, Bell Inequality Violation, Entanglement, Local Hidden Variable

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935) Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? http://www.drchinese.com/David/EPR.pdf
[2]	Bell, J.S. (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. https://www.bibnum.education.fr/sites/default/files/texte-bell-epr.pdf
[3]	Moatti, A. (2011) Les indispensables mathématiques et physiques pour tous. Editions Odile Jacob, 208-217.
[4]	Gribbin, J. (2010) Le chat de Schrödinger. Editions Flammarion, Paris.
[5]	Scarani, V. (2006) Initiation à la Physique Quantique. Editions Vuibert, Paris.
[6]	Aspect, A. (1983) Thèse de doctorat” 27 to 36. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00011844/
[7]	Serret, O. (2014) And If Bell’s Inequality Were Not Violated. Journal of Modern Physics, 5, 1360-1369. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2014.514137