Specificity and sensitivity of visual evoked potentials P100 latency to different events exercise

Jing-Guo Zhao, Shu-Juan Pang, Guang-Wei Che

.

DOI: 10.4236/health.2009.11009                

Abstract

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are a series of signals about visual occipital cortex in response to visual stimuli and can be used as one of ob-jective non-invasive neuro-physiological pa-rameters to reflect the visual organs and central visual pathway’s functional integrity. Previous studies have shown that acute and chronic ex-ercise could affect VEPs independent from body temperature and other physiological parameters. VEPs may well be used as neuro-physiological criteria in defining the performances of the ath-letes. Different sports training have different effects on VEPs, but the results are not consis-tent. P100 latency is the representative compo-nent of VEPs and it is of high, steady amplitude and of slight intra- and inter-individual variabil-ity so that the index is most commonly used. The purpose of this study was to investigate the specificity and sensitivity of P100 latency to dif-ferent physical activities. The neural electricity device of NDI-200 was used to measure the pattern reversal VEPs of all subjects, including the values of the resting state before and after different events exercise. Different events exer-cise contained an aerobic cycloergometric ex-ercise (7 subjects were conducted to a Bruce Graded Exercise Test on the Monark Ergomedic 839E cycloergometer, THR (target heart rate) = 85% HRmax, 3 times/week, about 10 minutes once time, 6 weeks), tennis training (16 volun-teers, 2 hours/day, 3 days/week, 8 weeks), aerobic Latin exercise (7 subjects, 1 hour/day, 3 days/week, 6 weeks) and the Baduanjin of Health Qigong training (6 subjects, 1 hour/day, 3 days/week, 6 weeks). The VEPs recordings of the control groups obtained synchronized with the experimental groups. SPSS 11.5 for win-dows was used for statistical analysis. A level of P﹤0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. The VEPs P100 latency of post-exercise of all experimental groups except Baduanjin group became shorter significantly compared with those of pre-exercise (P﹤0.05). No significant difference was found between pre-and post- exercise for the control groups. This study showed that exercise could shorten the P100 la-tency significantly. Moreover, it also indicated that VEPs were sensitive to exercise to a certain extent. We concluded that VEPs might well be used as neuro-physiological criteria in defining the performances of the athletes. It was found that the VEPs P100 latency became shorter after most training programs; furthermore, it demon-strated that P100 latency of VEPs had little specificity to different events.

Keywords

Visual Evoked Potentials, P100 Latency, Specificity, Sensitivity

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Y. G. Ozkaya, A. Agar, G. Hacioglu, et al., (2007). Exercise improves visual deficits tested by visual evoked potentials in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats, Tohoku J Exp Med, 213(4), 313-321.
[2]	R. Ozmerdivenli, S. Bulut, H. Bayar, et al., (2005) Effects of exercise on visual evoked potentials, Int J Neurosci., 115(7), 1043-1050.
[3]	Y. G. Ozkaya, A. Agar, G. Hacioglu, et al., (2003) Training in-duced alterations of visual evoked potentials are not related to body temperature, Int. J. Sports Med., 24, 359-362.
[4]	E. Delpont, C. Dolisi, G. Suisse, et al., (1991) Visual evoked potentials: differences related to physical activity, Int J Sports Med, 12(3), 293-298.
[5]	F. Taddei, M. P. Viggiano, and L. Mecacci, (1991) Pattern re-versal visual evoked potentials in fencers, Int J Psychophysiol, 11(3), 257-260.
[6]	N. G. Thomas, L. M. Harden, G. G. Rogers, (2005) Visual evoked potentials reaction times and eye dominance in cricket-ers, Sport Med Phy Fitness, 45(3), 428-433.
[7]	M. N. Magnie, S. Bermon, F. Martin, et al., (1998) Visual and brainstem auditory evoked potentials and maximal aerobic exer-cise: Does the influence of exercise persist after body tempera-ture recovery? Int. J Sports Med, 19(4), 255-259.
[8]	J. H. Wilmore and D. L. Costill, (1994) Physiology of sport and exercise, Human Kinetics, 300-316.
[9]	Z. N. Lu, Q. X. Zeng, C. Y. Li, et al., (2000) Practical electro-myography, Beijing: People’s Health Publishing House, 703-710.
[10]	J. G. Zhao, Y. Z. Zhu, and Y. S. Lan, (2007) Visual evoked po-tentials differences between the students of physical and non-physical education, J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res., 11(13), 2534-2536.
[11]	Y. Z. Zhu and J. G. Zhao, (2007) The application of visual and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in defining the function of the athletes, Laboratory of Somatic Science, Physical Education College, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong Prov-ince, China.
[12]	G. W. Che and J. G. Zhao, (2007) Longitudinal studies about visual and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in defining the function of the athletes, Laboratory of Somatic Science, Physi-cal Education College, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.