Share This Article:

Collaborative Design Studio on Trial: A Conceptual Framework in Practice

Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:1170KB) PP. 1-12
DOI: 10.4236/cus.2014.21001    7,430 Downloads   21,864 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Addressing interactive and communicative aspects of design process, architectural pedagogy, and practices of urban education, collaborative design studio (CDS) has become a considerable area of interdisciplinary research in the past years. However, a growing body of knowledge in CDS studies shows that the criteria of evidence-based practices, empirical explorations, and theoretical conceptualization of CDS have not been addressed properly yet. Thus, adopting quantitative and qualitative approaches, the study tends to provide a conceptual framework for CDS studies and explore the interrelations between three parameters of the generated model through a case study of collaborative design studio in practice. Firstly, the study tends to conceptualize various dimensions of collaborative design studio based on the previous researches in terms of place, content, process, time, and size. Secondly, the study implements correlational research methods in terms of structural equation model (SEM) and factor analysis in order to explore interrelations between parameters of size, place, and process in a case study. In this way, findings of the study indicate that the parameter of size has significant influences on the process factor in CDS practices. Moreover, it suggests that the parameter of place is not likely to have considerable impact on the factor of process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Kamalipour, H. , Kermani, Z. and Houshmandipanah, E. (2014) Collaborative Design Studio on Trial: A Conceptual Framework in Practice. Current Urban Studies, 2, 1-12. doi: 10.4236/cus.2014.21001.

References

[1] Alpay, L. L., & Littleton, K. S. (2001). Contexts for Collaboration in Healthcare Education. Health Informatics Journal, 7, 121-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146045820100700302
[2] Arefi, M., & Edelman, D. J. (2013). Morrow Tomorrow: Exploring the Pedagogical Experience of a Planning Studio Involving Students with Mixed Skills. Current Urban Studies, 1, 59.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/cus.2013.13007
[3] Astin, A. W. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[4] Belkadi, F., Bonjour, E., Camargo, M., Troussier, N., & Eynard, B. (2013). A Situation Model to Support Awareness in Collaborative Design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71, 110-129.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.03.002
[5] Bento, R. F. (1997). Creating the Conditions for Successful Teamwork in College Courses: A Systems Approach to Teamwork Design Decisions. College Student Journal, 31, 137-144.
[6] Blevis, E. (2010). Design Challenge Based Learning (DCBL) and Sustainable Pedagogical Practice. Interactions, 17, 64-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1744161.1744176
[7] Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
[8] Boling, E., & Smith, K. M. (2010). Intensive Studio Experience in a Non-Studio Masters Program: Student Activities and Thinking across Levels of Design. Montreal, CA: Paper Presented at the Design Research Society.
[9] Bosworth, K. (1994). Developing Collaborative Skills in College Students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1994, 25-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219945905
[10] Bowring, J. (2000). Increasing the Critical Mass: Emphasising Critique in Studio Teaching. Landscape Review, 6, 41-52.
[11] Bronet, F. (2000). Quilting Space. Knowledge and Society, 12, 229-261.
[12] Bronzino, J. D., Ahlgren, D. J., Chung, C.-L., Mertens, J. D., & Palladino, J. L. (1994). Design and Teamwork: A Must for Freshmen. IEEE Transactions on Education, 37, 184-188.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/13.284992
[13] Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt, & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social Measurement: Current Issues (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.
[14] Carroll, J. M., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L., Rosson, M. B., & McCrickard, D. S. (2003). Notification and Awareness: Synchronizing Task-Oriented Collaborative Activity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 605-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00024-7
[15] Cheng, N. Y.-W. (2003). Approaches to Design Collaboration Research. Automation in Construction, 12, 715-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00059-1
[16] Chiu, M.-L. (2002). An Organizational View of Design Communication in Design Collaboration. Design Studies, 23, 187-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00019-9
[17] Chiu, M.-L., Yamaguchi, S., & Morozumi, M. (2001). Supporting Collaborative Design Studios—Scenarios and Tools. Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), 125-134.
[18] Colbeck, C. L., & Campbell, S. E. (2000). Grouping in the Dark: What College Students Learn from Group Projects. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 60-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2649282
[19] Crilly, N. (2010). The Structure of Design Revolutions: Kuhnian Paradigm Shifts in Creative Problem Solving. Design Issues, 26, 54-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.54
[20] Crosbie, M. J. (1995). The Schools: How They’re Failing the Profession (and What We Can Do about It). Progressive Architecture, 76, 47-51.
[21] Daniel, R. W. (2002). Reinventing Ourselves: Interdisciplinary Education, Collaborative Learning, and Experimentation in Higher Education (Review). The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 667-669.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2002.0044
[22] Demirbas, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2003). Focus on Architectural Design Process through Learning Styles. Design Studies, 24, 437-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00013-9
[23] Denton, H. G. (1997). Multidisciplinary Team-Based Project Work: Planning Factors. Design Studies, 18, 155-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)85458-0
[24] Détienne, F., Boujut, J.-F., & Hohmann, B. (2004). Characterization of Collaborative Design and Interaction Management Activities in a Distant Engineering Design Situation. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
[25] Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M. J., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The Evolution of Research on Collaborative Learning. In E. Spada, & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science (pp. 189-211). Oxford, UK; New York: Pergamon.
[26] Duggan, F. (2004). The Changing Nature of the Studio as an Educational Setting. Transactions, 1, 70-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.11120/tran.2004.01020070
[27] Ehrlenspiel, K., Giapoulis, A., & Günther, J. (1997). Teamwork and Design Methodology—Observations about Teamwork in Design Education. Research in Engineering Design, 9, 61-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01596482
[28] Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133-156.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
[29] Fleck, L. (1981). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[30] Gabriel, G. C., & Maher, M. L. (2002). Coding and Modelling Communication in Architectural Collaborative Design. Automation in Construction, 11, 199-211.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00098-4
[31] Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining Student Satisfaction with Group Projects and Peer Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 365-377.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240401
[32] Gray, C. M. (2011). Design Pedagogy in Practice: Barriers to Learning and Evaluation in the Design Studio. Department of Instructional Systems Technology, School of Education, Indiana University Bloomington.
[33] Gross, M. D., & Do, E. Y.-L. (1997). The Design Studio Approach: Learning Design in Architecture Education. Atlanta: Paper presented at the Design Education Workshop, EduTech/NSF, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology.
[34] Hassanain, M. A., Mohammed, M. A., & Cetin, M. (2012). A Multi-Phase Systematic Framework for Performance Appraisal of Architectural Design Studio Facilities. Facilities, 30, 324-342.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632771211220077
[35] Hellström, T. (2007). The Individual vs. the Group? Individualization and Collectivity among Students in Collaborative Design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17, 305-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9004-2
[36] Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
[37] Ismail, A. M., & Soliman, M. H. (2010). Integrating Multi-grade Collaborative Learning Pedagogy into Design Studios. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 4, 201-215.
[38] Kamalipour, H., & Biglari, S. (2013). Implementing Patterns and Pattern Languages in Collaborative Design Pedagogy: A Case Study in Architectural Education. The IESC2013: The Young Teachers of the Future Discuss Teaching Profession at Maltepe University. Istanbul: Maltepe University.
[39] Kamalipour, H., Houshmandipanah, E., & Mansouri Kermani, Z. (2013). Collaborative Design Studio in Architectural Education: From Theory to Practice. The IESC2013: The Young Teachers of the Future Discuss Teaching Profession at Maltepe University. Istanbul: Maltepe University.
[40] Klein, M., Sayama, H., Faratin, P., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2006). The Dynamics of Collaborative Design: Insights from Complex Systems and Negotiation Research. In D. Braha, A. Minai, & Y. Bar-Yam (Eds.), Complex Engineered Systems: Science Meets Technology (pp. 158-174). Berlin: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32834-3_8
[41] Kleinsmann, M., Buijs, J., & Valkenburg, R. (2010). Understanding the Complexity of Knowledge Integration in Collaborative New Product Development Teams: A Case Study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 27, 20-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2010.03.003
[42] Kleinsmann, M., & Valkenburg, R. (2008). Barriers and Enablers for Creating Shared Understanding in Co-Design Projects. Design Studies, 29, 369-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.03.003
[43] Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
[44] Kuhn, S. (2001). Learning from the Architecture Studio: Implications for Project-Based Pedagogy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17, 349-352.
[45] Kurt, S. (2009). An Analytic Study on the Traditional Studio Environments and the Use of the Constructivist Studio in the Architectural Design Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 401-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.072
[46] Kvan, T. (2000). Collaborative Design: What Is It? Automation in Construction, 9, 409-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(99)00025-4
[47] Kvan, T. (2001). The Pedagogy of Virtual Design Studios. Automation in Construction, 10, 345-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00051-0
[48] Larsson, A., Törlind, P., Bergström, M., Löfstrand, M., & Karlsson, L. (2005). Design for Versatility: The Changing Face of Workspaces for Collaborative Design. The 15th International Conference on Engineering Design, Melbourne, 15-18 August 2005, 2275-2289.
[49] Lawson, B. (2004). What Designers Know. Boston, MA: Elsevier/Architectural Press.
[50] Lawson, B. (2006). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified (4th ed.). Oxford; Burlington, MA: Elsevier/ Architectural Press.
[51] Lewis, T. (2006). Creativity: A Framework for the Design/Problem Solving Discourse in Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 17, 36-53.
[52] Logan, C. (2008). Metaphor and Pedagogy in the Design Practicum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9009-x
[53] Macpherson, A. (2008). Cooperative Learning Group Activities for College Courses. British Columbia: The Centre for Academic Growth, Kwantlen Polytechnic University.
[54] Martin, W. M., Fruchter, R., Cavallin, H., & Heylighen, A. (2007). Different by Design. AI EDAM: Artificial Intelligence Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 21, 219-225.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0890060407000248
[55] McCallin, A. M., & McCallin, M. C. H. (2009). Factors Affecting Successful Team Working and Strategies to Facilitate Successful Collaborative Teamwork. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy, 37, 62-68.
[56] McPeek, K. T. (2009). Collaborative Design Pedagogy: A Naturalistic Inquiry of Architectural Education. Ph.D. Dissertation, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
[57] Mello, J. A. (1993). Improving Individual Member Accountability in Small Work Group Settings. Journal of Management Education, 17, 253-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105256299301700210
[58] Millis, B. J., & Cottell, P. G. (1998). Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
[59] Ochsner, J. K. (2000). Behind the Mask: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Interaction in the Design Studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 53, 194-206.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/104648800564608
[60] Oh, Y., Ishizaki, S., Gross, M. D., & Yi-Luen Do, E. (2012). A Theoretical Framework of Design Critiquing in Architecture Studios. Design Studies, 34, 302-325.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.004
[61] Peeters, M. A. G., van Tuijl, H. F., Reymen, I. M., & Rutte, C. G. (2007). The Development of a Design Behaviour Questionnaire for Multidisciplinary Teams. Design Studies, 28, 623-643.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.06.004
[62] Pektas, S. T. (2012). The Blended Design Studio: An Appraisal of New Delivery Modes in Design Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 692-697.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.226
[63] Pringle, E. (2009). The Artist-Led Pedagogic Process in the Contemporary Art Gallery: Developing a Meaning Making Framework. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28, 174-182.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01604.x
[64] Reimer, Y. J., & Douglas, S. A. (2003). Teaching HCI Design with the Studio Approach. Computer Science Education, 13, 191-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/csed.13.3.191.14945
[65] Romice, O., & Uzzell, D. (2005). Community Design Studio: A Collaboration of Architects and Psychologists. Transactions, 2, 73-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.11120/tran.2005.02010073
[66] Russ, R., & Dickinson, J. (1999). Collaborative Design: “Forming, Storming, and Norming”. Journal of Interior Design, 25, 52-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.1999.tb00344.x
[67] Sagun, A., & Demirkan, H. (2009). On-Line Critiques in Collaborative Design Studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 79-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9036-2
[68] Santos, J. A. R. (1999). Cronbach’s Alpha: A Tool for Assessing the Reliability of Scales. Journal of Extension, 37, 1-5.
[69] Schmitt, G. (1998). A New Collaborative Design Environment for Engineers and Architects. In I. Smith (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Structural Engineering: Information Technology for Design, Collaboration, Maintenance, and Monitoring (pp. 384-397). Berlin: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFb0030464
[70] Schnabel, M. A. (2009). Interplay of Domains. In X. Y. Wang, & M. A. Schnabel (Eds.), Mixed Reality in Architecture, Design and Construction (pp. 219-226). Dordrecht: Springer.
[71] Schon, D. A. (1995). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. England: Bookpoint Ltd.
[72] Schön, D. A. (1984). The Architectural Studio as an Exemplar of Education for Reflection-in-Action. Journal of Architectural Education, 38, 2-9.
[73] Schön, D. A. (1985). The Design Studio: An Exploration of Its Traditions and Potential. London: RIBA Publications for RIBA Building Industry Trust.
[74] Schön, D. A. (1988). Toward a Marriage of Artistry & Applied Science in the Architectural Design Studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 41, 4-10.
[75] Sellin, N., & Keeves, J. P. (1997). Path Analysis with Latent Variables. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: An International Handbook (2nd ed., pp. 633-640). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
[76] Simoff, S. J., & Maher, M. L. (2000). Analysing Participation in Collaborative Design Environments. Design Studies, 21, 119-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00043-5
[77] Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning and Intergroup Relations. In J. Banks, & C. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education (pp. 628-634). New York: Macmillan.
[78] Soliman, M. H., & Okba, E. M. (2006). Teamwork as a New Sustainable Pedagogy for Teaching Architectural Design. The Ain Shams University International Conference, Cairo, 11-16 September 2006, 181-192.
[79] Strong, D. S., & Stiver, W. (2005). Engineering Design Competency: Perceived Barriers to Effective Engineering Design Education. The 2nd CDEN International Conference on Design Education, Innovation, and Practice, Kananaskis, 18-20 July 2005.
[80] Summers, J. J., Gorin, J. S., Beretvas, S. N., & Svinicki, M. D. (2005). Evaluating Collaborative Learning and Community. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 165-188.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.73.3.165-188
[81] Tang, H. H., & Lee, Y. Y. (2008). Using Design Paradigms to Evaluate the Collaborative Design Process of Traditional and Digital Media. In J. S. Gero, & A. K. Goel (Eds.), Design Computing and Cognition ‘08 (pp. 439-456). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
[82] Tang, J. C. (1991). Findings from Observational Studies of Collaborative Work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 143-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(91)90039-A
[83] Tseng, Y. J., Tzeng, H. L., & Lin, Y. H. (2005). Collaborative Design Model Planning with a Design Module Formation and Design Task Assignment Model. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 22, 309-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10170660509509301
[84] Tucker, R., & Reynolds, C. (2006). The Impact of Teaching Models, Group Structures and Assessment Modes on Cooperative Learning in the Student Design Studio. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 1, 39-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2006.01020039
[85] Ungar, J., & White, J. (2008). Agile User Centered Design: Enter the Design Studio—A Case Study. The CHI’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, 5-10April 2008, 2167-2177.
[86] Valkenburg, R. (2001). Schön Revised: Describing Team Designing with Reflection-in-Action. The DTRS 5, Delft, 18-21 December 2001, 315-329.
[87] Vieira, A. L. (2011). Interactive LISREL in Practice. Heidelberg: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18044-6
[88] Vyas, D., Heylen, D., Nijholt, A., & Van Der Veer, G. (2009). Collaborative Practices that Support Creativity in Design. In I. Wagner (Ed.), ECSCW 2009 (pp. 151-170). London: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-854-4_9
[89] Wang, W. L., Shih, S. G., & Chien, S. F. (2010). A “Knowledge Trading Game” for Collaborative Design Learning in an Architectural Design Studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 433-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9091-y
[90] Webster, H. (2004). The Design Diary: Promoting Reflective Practice in the Design Studio. Architectural Design: Monitoring Architectural Design. EAAE Transactions on Architectural Education, 24, 343-356.
[91] Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2010). Cognitive Heuristics in Design: Instructional Strategies to Increase Creativity in Idea Generation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24, 335-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0890060410000235
[92] Yin, Y., Qin, S., & Holland, R. (2011). Development of a Design Performance Measurement Matrix for Improving Collaborative Design during a Design Process. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60, 152-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410401111101485

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.