Pseudo class III treatment in 2-year-old children ()
Abstract
Timing of orthodontic treatment especially for children with developing Class III malocclusions has always been somewhat
controversial. Pseudo class III malocclusion is recommended to be treated early
as this type of malocclusion doesn’t diminish with age. Untreated pseudo class
III may lead to serious problems. The case
report describes pseudo class III in primary dentition successfully
treated by using Protrusive Arch Wire.
Share and Cite:
Mahfouz, M. (2014) Pseudo class III treatment in 2-year-old children.
Open Journal of Stomatology,
4, 10-13. doi:
10.4236/ojst.2014.41003.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1]
|
Campbell, P.H. (1983) The dilemma of class III treatment early or late? Angle Orthodontist, 53, 175-191.
|
[2]
|
Kapust, A.J., Sinclair, P.M. and Turley, P.K. (1998) Cephalometric effects of face mask/expansion therapy in class III children. American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, 113, 204-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70141-6
|
[3]
|
Proffit, W.R. (2000) Contemporary orthodontics. 3rd Edition, Mosby, St Louis, 276-277.
|
[4]
|
Sharma, P.S. and Brown, R.V. (1968) Pseudo mesiocclusion: Diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Dentistry for Children, 35, 385-392.
|
[5]
|
Estreia, F., Almerich, J. and Gascon, F. (1991) Interceptive correction of anterior crossbite. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 15, 157-159.
|