Evaluation of a rehabilitation support service after acute stroke: Feasibility and patient/carer benefit

Joanna J. McAdam, Michael J. Leathley, Margaret S. Crichton, Julie Dickens, Cathy I. A. Jack, Caroline L. Watkins

Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Crossroads Care (Liverpool, Sefton and Warrington), Liverpool, UK.
School of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Therapies Directorate, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.

DOI: 10.4236/health.2013.57152                

Abstract

Background: Stroke survivors returning home after discharge from hospital and their carers require support to meet their rehabilitation needs (independence in Activities of Daily Living, exercise, psychosocial support). Voluntary or charitable care providers may be able to address some of these needs. Objective: To explore the feasibility of delivering and evaluating enhanced support to stroke survivors and their carers, with a Rehabilitation Support Worker (RSW). Methods: 16 consecutive stroke survivors and their carers were included. All participants received usual hospital care. Seven of these patients and their carers were also allocated an RSW from a charitable care provider. The RSW accompanied therapy training sessions with the patient, carer and therapist in hospital. On discharge, the RSW visited the patient and carer at home over the initial 6 week post-discharge period to support them in practising rehabilitation skills. Patient function (Barthel Index) and patient/carer confidence were independently assessed at discharge (Week 0). The above assessments and patient/carer mood (GHQ-12) and Carer Giver Strain were also assessed at Weeks 1, 6 and 12. RSWs were interviewed for their views about the service. Results: Participants’ functional ability at Week 1 post-discharge was significantly higher in the RSW group. At 6 and 12 weeks post-discharge, functional ability was not significantly different between groups. Carers in the intervention group were less confident at all time points, however, this was not significant. There was no significant effect on carer strain or well-being. Interviews with RSWs highlighted areas of their training that could be enhanced and the need for greater clarity as to their role. Conclusions: The results showed that a definitive trial of rehabilitation support is feasible. A number of obstacles however would need to be overcome including: difficulty in identifying suitable patients, clarity of the RSW role, and appropriate training content.

Keywords

Stroke; Rehabilitation; Activities of Daily Living; Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Wolfe, C.D. (2000) The impact of stroke. British Medical Bulletin, 56, 275-286. doi:10.1258/0007142001903120
[2]	Walker, M.F., Leonardi-Bee, J., Bath, P., Langhorne, P., Dewey, M. and Corr, S. (2004) Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of community occupational therapy for stroke patients. Stroke, 35, 2226-2232. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000137766.17092.fb
[3]	Watkins, C.L., Leathley, M.J. and Sharma, A.K. (2002) Stroke interface audit: Pre/post discharge audit of stroke services and care in Liverpool and Sefton: Delivery timeliness and targeting—36 month report. University of Central Lancashire, Preston.
[4]	Garraway, W.M., Akhtar, A.J., Hockey, L. and Prescott, R.J. (1980) Management of acute stroke in the elderly: Follow-up of a controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 281, 827-829. doi:10.1136/bmj.281.6244.827
[5]	Ellis, G., Mant, J., Lang-horne, P., Dennis, M. and Winner, S. (2010) Stroke liaison workers for stroke patients and carers: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Coch- rane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, CD005066.
[6]	Kalra, L., Evans, A., Perez, I., Melbourn, A., Patel, A., Knapp, M. and Donaldson, N. (2004) Training carers of stroke patients: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 328, 1099-1103. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1099
[7]	Mant, J., Carter, J., Wade, D.T. and Winner, S. (2000) Family support for stroke: A ran-domised controlled trial. Lancet, 356, 808-813. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02655-6
[8]	Dennis, M., O’Rourke, S., Slattery, J., Staniforth, T. and Warlow, C. (1997) Evaluation of a stroke family care worker: Results of a randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 314, 1071-1076. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7087.1071
[9]	Lincoln, N.B., Francis, V.M., Lilley, S.A., Sharma, J.C. and Summerfield, M. (2003) Evaluation of a stroke family support organiser: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 34, 116-121. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000047850.33686.32
[10]	Kubina, L.A., Dubouloz, C.J., Davis, C.G., Kessler, D. and Egan, M.Y. (2013) The process of re-engagement in personally valued activities during the two years following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35, 236-243. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.691936
[11]	Dennis, M., O’Rourke, S., Lewis, S., Sharpe, M., Warlow, C. (1998) A quantitative study of the emotional outcome of people caring for stroke survivors. Stroke, 29, 1867- 1872. doi:10.1161/01.STR.29.9.1867
[12]	Bugge, C., Alexander, H. and Hagen, S. (1999) Stroke patients’ informal caregivers. Patient, caregiver and service factors that affect caregiver strain. Stroke, 30, 1517- 1523. doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.8.1517
[13]	Rouillard, S., De Weerdt, W., De Wit, L. and Jelsma, J. (2012) Functioning at 6 months post stroke following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. South African Medical Journal, 102, 545-548.
[14]	Talbot, L.R., Viscogliosi, C., Desrosiers, J., Vincent, C., Rousseau, J. and Robichaud, L. (2004) Identification of rehabilitation needs after a stroke: An exploratory study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 53-61. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-2-53
[15]	Cameron, J.I., Naglie, G., Silver, F.L. and Gignac, M.A.M. (2013) Stroke family caregivers’ support needs change across the care continuum: A qualitative study using the timing it right framework. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35, 315-324. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.691937
[16]	Langhorne, P., Taylor, G., Murray, G., Dennis, M., An- derson, C., Bautz-Holter, E., Dey, P., Indredavik, B., Ma- yo, N., Power, M., Rodgers, H., Ronning, O.M., Rudd, A., Suwanwela, N., Widen-Holmqvist, L. and Wolfe, C. (2005) Early supported discharge services for stroke patients: A meta-analysis of individual patients’ data. Lancet, 365, 501-506.
[17]	Tilling, K., Coshall, C., McKevitt, C., Daneski, K. and Wolfe, C. (2005) A family support organiser for stroke patients and their carers: A randomised controlled trial. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 20, 85-91. doi:10.1159/000086511
[18]	Wade, D.T. and Collin, C. (1988) The Barthel ADL index: A standard measure of physical disability? International Disability Studies, 10, 64-67. doi:10.3109/09638288809164105
[19]	Goldberg, D.P. and Hillier, V.F. (1979) A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Me- dicine, 9, 139-145. doi:10.1017/S0033291700021644
[20]	Robinson, B.C. (1983) Validation of a caregiver strain index. The Journals of Gerontology, 38, 344-348. doi:10.1093/geronj/38.3.344
[21]	Anderson, C., Rubenach, S., Mhurchu, C.N., Clark, M., Spencer, C. and Winsor, A. (2000) Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? Results of a ran-domized controlled trial: 1: Health outcomes at 6 months. Stroke, 31, 1024- 1031. doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.5.1024
[22]	Duffy, B., Smith, K., Terhanian, G. and Bremer, J. (2005) Comparing data from online and face-to-face surveys. International Journal of Market Research, 47, 615-639.