Effect of Gangue Minerals on Hydrophobic Recovery of Gold

Anderson E. L. Mlaki, Jamidu H. Y. Katima, Henry T. Kimweri

University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

DOI: 10.4236/eng.2013.53043                

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of gangue minerals on the hydrophobic recovery of gold is being investigated using ores obtained from the active small scale gold mining sites in Tanzania. Gold ores of different gangue contents were tested. The effects of silica gangue and high sulphide gangue on gold attachment were examined including the effect of surface activators (potassium amyl xanthate) and the possibility of depressing the effects of gangue using reagents. The results were evaluated in terms of gold recovery, volumes and grade of concentrates formed. There was no change in gold recoveries when the amount of oxide gangue (quartz) in the ore was increased, indicating absence of competition between gold and quartz gangue. High sulphide contents in the ore above 6% reduced gold recoveries considerably. It was noted that potassium amyl xanthate surfactants increased the attachment of both gold and the sulphide gangue. Using lime at pH 10 it was possible to depress the sulphide gangue which is mainly pyrite and hence increased gold recoveries considerably.

Keywords

Aggl/Ore Ratio; Gangue Minerals; Hydrophobicity; Surfactants; Gangue Depressants; Oleophilicity

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	M. John and H. Lain, “The Chemistry of Gold Extraction,” Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, 1969.
[2]	M. Hausen, “Characterizing the Textural Features of Gold Ores for Optimizing Gold Extraction,” Journal of Mining, Vol. 52, No. 4, 2000, pp. 14-16.
[3]	D. Kocabag, G. H. Kelsall and H. L. Shergold, “Natural Oleophilicity-Hydrophobicity of Sulphide Minerals,” Imperial College of Science and Technology, Mineral Resources Engineering Department Publications, London, 2003.
[4]	B. A. Wills and N. M. Tim, “Mineral Processing Technology; An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery,” 7th Edition, Elsevier Science & Technology Books, 2006, p. 269.
[5]	A. Akcil, X. Q. Wu and E. Aksay, “'Coal-Gold Agglomeration; An Alternative Separation Process in Gold Recovery,” Separation & Purification Reviews, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2009, pp. 173-201. doi:10.1080/15422110902855043
[6]	J. P. Calvez, M. J. Kim, P. L. Wong and T. Tran, “Use of Coal-Oil Agglomerates For Particulate Gold Recovery,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 9, 1998, pp. 803-812. doi:10.1016/S0892-6875(98)00067-3
[7]	R. Brett, “Re-Logging of Diamond Drill Core, Chocolate Reef (Buzwagi), Nzega Greenbelt, North West Tanzania,” Exploration Reports, Dodoma, 2001.
[8]	A. E. Mlaki, J. H. Katima and H. T. Kimweri, “Gold Recovery from Gold Bearing Materials Using Bio-Diesel, Vegetable Oils and Coal,” Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2011, pp. 555-560. doi:10.4236/eng.2011.35065
[9]	D. C. Ronald, “Flotation Theory Reagents and Ore Testing,” Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1992.
[10]	T. Guler, S. Cetinkaya, U. Akdemir, T. Dogan and D. Kocabag, “Effect of Fe-Ions on Pyrite-Xanthate Interaction in Chemically Manipulated Electrochemical Conditions,” International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2009, pp. 1-7.?
[11]	C. Fan, R. Markuszewski and T. Wheelock, “Effect of Multivalent Cations on Oil Agglomeration of Coal and Pyrite,” International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1992, pp. 167-175. doi:10.1080/07349349208905214