Five-year impact of a new departmental protocol on emergency cesarean target times

Visnja Korda, Roland Zimmermann

Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2013.31A028                

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of an emergency cesarean standard operating procedure (SOP) on the decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and to determine whether a shorter DDI improves neonatal outcome. Methods: Retrospective analysis of emergency cesareans from 2004 (introduction of the new SOP) to 2009 in a Swiss Level 3 perinatal center. Primary endpoints were the DDI, the pathology-to-decision interval (PDI), the 5 year learning curve, and neonatal and maternal outcome. Results: In the emergency cesarean group (175 women and 188 infants), mean DDI decreased over the observation period from 15 to 9 minutes (mean 10 minutes 41 seconds), and mean PDI from 11 to 6 minutes (mean 8 minutes). Not only did the DDI not exceed 15 minutes in over 90% of cases during the 5 years, but it fell consistently below 10 minutes in the latter stages of the learning curve. Only 2/188 infants had an umbilical artery pH < 7.00 and 19/188 had an Apgar score <5 at 5 minutes. Maternal morbidity comprised three cases of superficial wound infection. Conclusion: Logistic prerequisites comprise a surgical capability directly within the delivery suite, a standby surgical and anesthetic team, a crash call system, and clear duty allocation. International guideline target times are readily achievable at no additional significant fetal or maternal cost.

Keywords

Emergency Cesarean Delivery; Decision-to-Delivery Interval; Neonatal Outcome; Maternal Outcome

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Adamsons, K. and Myers, R.E. (1977) Late decelerations and brain tolerance of the fetal monkey to intrapartum asphyxia. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 128, 893-900.
[2]	American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1988) Intrapartum and postpartum care of women. Guidelines for perinatal care. AAP, Elk Grove Village, ACOG, Washington, 125-161.
[3]	Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Great Britain) (1995) Organisational standards for maternity services: Report of a joint working group. RCOG Press, London.
[4]	Berg, D. and Ratzel, R. (1995) Minimum requirements for procedural, structural and organizational preconditions for obstetric departments. Frauenarzt, 36, 27-33.
[5]	Tuffnell, D.J., Wilkinson, K. and Beresford, N. (2001) Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section—Are current standards achievable? British Medical Journal, 322, 1330-1333. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1330
[6]	Bloom, S.L., Leveno, K.J., Spong, C.Y., Gilbert, S., Hauth, J.C., Landon, M.B., et al. (2006) Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 108, 6-11. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000224693.07785.14
[7]	Leung, T.Y., Chung, P.W., Rogers, M.S., Sahota, D.S., Lao, T.T. and Hung Chung, T.K. (2009) Urgent cesarean delivery for fetal bradycardia. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 14, 1023-1028. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bc6e15
[8]	Helmy, W.H., Jolaoso, A.S., Ifaturoti, O.O., Afify, S.A. and Jones, M.H. (2002) The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: Is 30 minutes a realistic target? Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 109, 505-508. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00491.x
[9]	Onah, H.E., Ibeziako, N., Umezulike, A.C., Effetie, E.R. and Ogbuokiri, C.M. (2005) Decision-delivery interval and perinatal outcome in emergency caesarean sections. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 25, 342-346. doi:10.1080/01443610500119671
[10]	Livermore, L.J. and Cochrane, R.M. (2006) Decision to delivery interval: A retrospective study of 1000 emergency caesarean sections. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 26, 307-310. doi:10.1080/01443610600594898
[11]	Zimmermann, R. (2006) Obstetric Handbook. Department of Obstetrics, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich.
[12]	Lucas, D.N., Yentis, S.M., Kinsella, S.M., Holdcroft, A., May, A.E., Wee, M., et al. (2000) Urgency of caesarean section: A new classification. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 93, 346-350.
[13]	Korhonen, J. and Kariniemi, V. (1994) Emergency cesarean section: The effect of delay on umbilical arterial gas balance and Apgar scores. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 73, 782-786. doi:10.3109/00016349409072505
[14]	Spencer, M.K. and MacLennan, A.H. (2001) How long does it take to deliver a baby by emergency caesarean section? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 41, 7-11. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2001.tb01287.x
[15]	de Regt, H.R., Marks, K., Joseph, D.L. and Malmgren, J.A. (2009) Time from decision to incision for caesarean deliveries at a community hospital. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 113, 625-629.
[16]	Hillemanns, P., Strauss, A., Hasbargen, U., Schulze, A., Genzel-Boroviczeny, O., Weninger, E., et al. (2005) Crash emergency cesarean section: decision-to-delivery interval under 30 min and its effect on Apgar and umbilical artery pH. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 273, 161-165. doi:10.1007/s00404-005-0045-7
[17]	Kamoshita, E., Amano, K., Kanai, Y., Mochizuki, J., Ikeda, Y., Kikuchi, S., et al. (2010) Effect of the interval between onset of sustained fetal bradycardia and cesarean delivery on long-term neonatal neurologic prognosis. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 111, 23-27. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.05.022
[18]	Merién, A.E., van de Ven, J., Mol, B.W., Houterman, S. and Oei, S.G. (2010) Multidisciplinary team training in a simulation setting for acute obstetric emergencies: A systematic review. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 115, 1022-1031. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d9f4cd
[19]	Berglund, S., Grunewald, C., Pettersson, H. and Cnattingius, S. (2008) Severe asphyxia due to delivery-related malpractice in Sweden 1990-2005. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 115, 316-23. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01602.x
[20]	Smaill, F.M. and Gyte, G.M. (2010) Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 20, CD007482.
[21]	Lewis, G. and Drife, J., Eds. (2001) Why mothers die 1997-1999. In: The Fifth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom, RCOG Press, London.
[22]	F?ssler, M., Zimmermann, R. and Quack, K. (2010) Maternal mortality in Switzerland 1995-2004. Swiss Medical Weekly, 140, 25-30.
[23]	Lim, S.K. and Elegbe, E.O. (1991) The use of single dose of sodium citrate as a prophylaxis against acid aspiration syndrome in obstetric patients undergoing caesarean section. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 46, 349-355.
[24]	Leung, A.S., Leung, E.K. and Paul, R.H. (1993) Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: Maternal and fetal consequences. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 169, 945-950.
[25]	Kayani, I.K., Walkinshaw, S.A. and Preston, C. (2003) Pregnancy outcome in severe placental abruption. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 110, 679-683. doi:10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02088.x