Investigating the Suitability of Agile Methods for Requirements Development of Home Care Systems

Sandra Kelly, Frank Keenan

.

DOI: 10.4236/jsea.2010.39104                

Abstract

The ageing population in developed countries brings many benefits but also many challenges, particularly in terms of the development of appropriate technology to support their ability to remain in their own home environment. One particular challenge reported for such Home Care Systems (HCS) is the identification of an appropriate requirements development technique for dealing with the typical diverse stakeholders involved. Agile Methods (AMs) recognize this challenge and propose techniques that could be useful. This paper examines the desirable characteristics identified for requirements development in HCS and investigates the extent to which agile practices conform to these. It also sets out future work to improve the situation for the non compliant points found.

Keywords

Home Care Systems (HCS), Agile Methods, Requirements Development

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	World Health Organization (WHO), “Public Health Implications of Global Ageing,” 2010. http://www.who int/features/qa/42/en/index.html
[2]	S. Roberts, T. Basi, A. Drazin and J. Wherton, “Connections: Mobility and Quality of Life for Older People in Rural Ireland” Intel Corporation, America, 2007.
[3]	Technology Research for Independent Living (TRIL) “Falls Prevention,” 2010. http://www.trilcentre.org/falls_ prevention/falls_prevention.474.html
[4]	M. R. McGee-Lennon, “Requirements Engineering for Home Care Technology,” Proceeding of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy, 2008, pp. 1439-1442.
[5]	T. McBryan, M. R. McGee-Lennon and P. Gray, “An Integrated Approach to Supporting Interaction Evolution in Home Care Systems,” Proceedings of the 1st international Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related To Assistive Environments, Athens, July 2008, pp. 1-8.
[6]	A. Davis, O. Dieste, A. Hickey, N. Juristo and A. M. Moreno, “Effectiveness of Requirements Elicitation Techniques: Empirical Results Derived from a Systematic Review,” Proceedings of 14th IEEE International Conference of Requirements Engineering, Minneapolis, September 2006, pp. 179-188.
[7]	H. Van Vliet, Ed., “Software Engineering Principles and Practice,” John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 2000.
[8]	B. Nuseibeh and S. Easterbrook, “Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap,” Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering, ACM Press, Limerick Ireland, 2000.
[9]	K. Beck, et al. “The Agile Manifesto,” 2001. http://www. agilealliance.com
[10]	S. W. Ambler, “Agile Modeling: Effective Practices for Extreme Programming and the Unified Process,” John Wiley & Sons Inc., Chichester, 2002.
[11]	D. Astels, G. Miller and N. Miroslav, “A Practical Guide to Extreme Programming,” Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2002.
[12]	H. Sharp, H. Robinson, J. Segal and D. Furniss, “The Role of Story Cards and the Wall in XP teams: A Distributed Cognition Perspective,” Proceedings of Agile, IEEE Computer, Society Press, Washington, DC, 2006, pp. 65- 75.
[13]	W. Pietri, “An XP Team Room,” 2004. http://www.scissor .com/resources/teamroom
[14]	L. Cao and B. Ramesh, “Agile Requirements Engineering Practices: An Empirical Study,” Software, IEEE, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2008, pp. 60-67.
[15]	A. Martin, R. Biddle and J. Noble. “XP Customer Practices: A Grounded Theory,” Proceedings of Agile Conference, agile, Chicago, August 2009, pp. 33-40.
[16]	B. W. Boehm and R. Turner, “Using Risk to Balance Agile and Plan-Driven Methods,” Computer, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2003, pp. 57-66.