Shape Optimization of a Regenerative Blower Used for Building Fuel Cell System

Abstract

This paper describes the optimal design of a Cathode blower used for a building fuel cell system. The Cathode air blower has a regenerative blower type. Two design variables, extension angle and number of impeller blade are introduced to enhance the blower performance. Pressure and efficiency of the blower are selected as an object function, and the optimal design is performed by a response surface method. Three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations are introduced to analyze the performance and internal flow of the blower and to find the value of object function for the training data. Throughout the design optimization, it is found that an extension angle is effective to increase blower efficiency in the blower. The pressure rise for the optimal blower is successfully increased up to 3.17% compared with that of reference one at the design flow rate. It is noted that low velocity region disturbs to make strong recirculation flow in the each blade passage, thus increases local pressure loss. Detailed flow field inside a regenerative blower is also analyzed and compared.

Share and Cite:

C. Jang and J. Lee, "Shape Optimization of a Regenerative Blower Used for Building Fuel Cell System," Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 2 No. 4A, 2012, pp. 208-214. doi: 10.4236/ojfd.2012.24A023.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] C.-M. Jang, J.-S. Lee, B.-Y. Tak and C.-G. Kim, “Characteristics of Design Parameters for an Industrial Regenerative Blower,” Proceedings of the Summer Conference of The Society of Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea, Yongpyeong Resort, June 2012, pp. 175-178. (in Korean).
[2] C.-M. Jang and G.-Y. Han, “Enhancement of Performance by Blade Optimization in Two-Stage Ring Blower,” Journal of Thermal Science, Vol. 19, No. 5, 2010, pp. 383-389. doi:10.1007/s11630-010-0398-5
[3] Y.-S. Choi, K.-Y. Lee, K.-H. Jeong, Y.-K. Kim and J.-M. Seo, “Design and Performance Evaluation of Side Channel Type Regenerative Blower,” Proceedings of KSME Manufacturing and Design Engineering Division Spring Conference, Jeju, June 2011, pp. 31-32. (in Korean).
[4] R. H. Myers and D. C. Montgomery, “Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments,” John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1995.
[5] N. E. Sevant, M. I. G. Bloor and M. J. Wilson, “Aerodynamic Design of a Flying Wing Using Response Surface Methodology,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2000, pp. 562-569. doi:10.2514/2.2665
[6] “AMCA 210(ASHRAE 51) Standard: Laboratory Methods of Testing Fans for Aerodynamic Performance Rating,” Air Movement and Control Association (AMCA) International, Inc. and ASHRAE, Inc., Arlington Heights, Atlanta, 1999.
[7] “CFX-13 User Manual,” ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, 2011.
[8] F. R. Menter, “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Application,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1994, pp. 1598-1605. doi:10.2514/3.12149
[9] A. A. Guinta, “Aircraft Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Using Design of Experimental Theory and Response Surface Modeling Methods,” Ph.D. Dissertant, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 1997.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.