A General Framework For Determining the Temporal and Evolutionary Dynamics of Religion-Based Website Popularity on the Internet


Religion-based websites are fast becoming a major pipeline for disseminating religious information to broad populations of individuals in the United States.Both mainstream religions and fringe religions are easily accessible to a large population of internet users. The purpose of this review is to develop and examine a general framework that uses simple mathematical and statistical models to interpret and measure temporal ‘snap shots’ in the popularity of religious websites. We extend this framework to include an evolutionary model that has the potential to predict long-term shifts or changes in the popularity of religious websites over time. Ultimately, the goal of this review is to introduce a new modeling framework for research into how the internet is changing the accessibility and views of populations of individuals who follow various religions on the internet and how this may in-turn affect the distribution of religion in the ‘real world’.

Share and Cite:

M. Golinski and C. Petersen, "A General Framework For Determining the Temporal and Evolutionary Dynamics of Religion-Based Website Popularity on the Internet," Open Journal of Statistics, Vol. 2 No. 4, 2012, pp. 424-428. doi: 10.4236/ojs.2012.24052.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] H. Rheingold, “The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier,” MIT Press, London, 2000.
[2] D. B. Barret, G. T. Kurian and T. M. Johnson, “World Christian Encyclopedia: A Comparative Survey of Churches and Religions in the Modern World Volume 1: The World by Countries: Religionists, Churches, Ministries,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
[3] L. Lorne, L. L. Dawson and D. E. Cowan, “Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet,” Routledge, London, 2004.
[4] C. Helland, “Popular Religion and the World Wide Web: A Match Made in (Cyber) Heaven,” In: L. L. Dawson and D. E. Cowan, Eds., Religion Online: Finding Faith on the Internet, Routledge, London, 2004, pp. 23-35.
[5] S. J. Shennan and J. R. Wilkinson, “Ceramic style change and Neutral Evolution: A Case Study from Neolithic Europe,” American Antiquity, Vol. 66, No. 4, 2001, pp. 577-594. doi:10.2307/2694174
[6] M. W. Hahn and R. A. Bentley, “Drift as a Mechanism for Cultural Change: An Example from Baby Names,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, Vol. 270, No. 1, 2003, pp. S120-S123. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0045
[7] B. H. Hall, A. B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg, “The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools,” In: M. Trajtenberg, Ed., Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2002, pp. 403-460.
[8] W. Reed, “The Pareto, Zipf and Other Power Laws,” Economics Letters, Vol. 74, No. 1, 2001, pp. 15-19. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00524-9
[9] R. A. Bentley, C. P. Lipo, H. A. Herzog and M. W. Hahn, “Regular Rates of Popular Culture Change Reflect Random Copying,” Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2007, pp. 151-158. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.10.002
[10] C. Anderson, “The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More,” Hyperion, New York, 2006.
[11] J. F. Crow and M. Kimura, “An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory,” Harper and Row, New York, 1970.
[12] F. D. Neiman, “Stylistic Variation in Evolutionary Perspective: Inferences from Decorative Diversity and Inter-Assemblage Distance in Illinois Woodland Ceramic Assemblages,” American Antiquity, Vol. 60, No. 1, 1995, pp. 7-36. doi:10.2307/282074
[13] C. P. Lipo, M. E. Madsen, R. C. Dunnell and T. Hunt, “Population Structure, Cultural Transmission and Frequency Seriation,” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, Vol. 16, 1997, pp. 301-333. doi:10.1006/jaar.1997.0314

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.