Using mutual information to evaluate performance of medical imaging systems
Eri Matsuyama, Du-Yih Tsai, Yongbum Lee, Katsuyuki Kojima
DOI: 10.4236/health.2010.24040   PDF   HTML     5,233 Downloads   9,186 Views   Citations


Information on physical image quality of medical images is important for imaging system assessment in order to promote and stimulate the development of state-of-the-art imaging systems. In this paper, we present a method for evaluating physical performance of medical imaging systems. In this method, mutual information (MI) which is a concept from information theory was used to measure combined properties of image noise and resolution of an imaging system. In our study, the MI was used as a measure to express the amount of information that an output image contains about an input object. The more the MI value provides, the better the image quality is. To validate the proposed method, computer simulations were per- formed to investigate the effects of noise and resolution degradation on the MI, followed by measuring and comparing the performance of two imaging systems. Our simulation and experimental results confirmed that the combined effect of deteriorated blur and noise on the images can be measured and analyzed using the MI metric. The results demonstrate the potential usefulness of the proposed method for evaluating physical quality of medical imaging systems.

Share and Cite:

Matsuyama, E. , Tsai, D. , Lee, Y. and Kojima, K. (2010) Using mutual information to evaluate performance of medical imaging systems. Health, 2, 279-285. doi: 10.4236/health.2010.24040.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Fujita, H., Doi, K. and Giger, M.L. (1985) Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 6. MTFs of II-TV digital imaging systems. Medical Physics, 12, 713-720.
[2] Giger, M.L., Doi, K. and Fujita, H. (1986) Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 7. Noise Wiener spectra of II-TV digital imaging systems. Medical Physics, 13, 131-138.
[3] Shannon, C.E. (1948) Mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423, 623- 656.
[4] Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
[5] Skerl, D., Likar, B. and Pernus, F. (2006) A protocol for evaluation of similarity measures for rigid registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 25, 779-791.
[6] Pluim, J.P.W., Maintz, J.B.A. and Viergever, M.A. (2003) Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 22, 986-1004.
[7] Tourassi, G.D., Harrawood, B., Singh, S. and Lo, J.Y.(2007) Information-theoretic CAD system in mammography: Entropy-based indexing for computational efficiency and robust performance. Medical Physics, 34, 3193-3204.
[8] Lee, Y., Tsai, D.Y. and Matsuyama, E. (2007) A simulation study of radiographic image quality measurement based on transmitted information. Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology, 63, 341-344.
[9] Tsai, D.Y., Lee, Y. and Matsuyama, E. (2008) Information-entropy measure for evaluation of image. Journal of Digital Imaging, 21, 338-347.
[10] Cover, T.M. and Thomas, J.A. (1991) Elements of information theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
[11] Attneave, F. (1967) Applications of information theory to psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
[12] Sprawls, P.Jr. (1995) Physical principles of medical imaging. Medical Physics Publishing, Wisconsin.

Copyright © 2021 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.