Separation of a Signal of Interest from a Seasonal Effect in Geophysical Data: I. El Niño/La Niña Phenomenon
David H. Douglass
.
DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2011.24045   PDF    HTML     7,433 Downloads   11,277 Views   Citations

Abstract

Geophysical signals N of interest are often contained in a parent signal G that also contains a seasonal signal X at a known frequency fX. The general issues associated with identifying N and X and their separation from G are considered for the case where G is the Pacific sea surface temperature monthly data, SST3.4; N is the El Niño/La Niña phenomenon and the seasonal signal X is at a frequency of 1/(12 months). It is shown that the commonly used climatology method of subtracting the average seasonal values of SST3.4 to produce the widely used anomaly index Nino3.4 is shown not to remove the seasonal signal. Furthermore, it is shown that the climatology method will always fail. An alternative method is presented in which a 1/fX (= 12 months) moving average filter F is applied to SST3.4 to generate an El Niño/La Niña index NL that does not contain a seasonal signal. Comparison of NL and Nino3.4 shows, among other things, that estimates of the relative magnitudes of El Niños from index NL agree with observations but estimates from index Nino3.4 do not. These results are applicable to other geophysical measurements.

Share and Cite:

D. Douglass, "Separation of a Signal of Interest from a Seasonal Effect in Geophysical Data: I. El Niño/La Niña Phenomenon," International Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 2 No. 4, 2011, pp. 414-419. doi: 10.4236/ijg.2011.24045.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] D. H. Douglass. “El Ni?o Southern Oscillation: Magni- tudes and Asymmetry,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115, No. D15, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1029/2009JD013508
[2] A. V. Federov and S. G. Philander, “Is El Nino Sporadic or Cyclic?” Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sci- ences, Vol. 31, No. 31, pp. 579-594, doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.31.100901.141255.2003
[3] NOAA/CPC. SST Data and Indices at 2009. http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/
[4] A. C. Barnston, M. Chelliah and S. Goldenberg, “Docu- mentation of a Highly ENSO Related SST Region in the Equatorial Pacific,” Atmosphere-Ocean, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1997, pp. 367-383. doi:10.1080/07055900.1997.9649597
[5] S. W. Smith, “The Scientists and Engineer’s Guide to Signal Processing,” California Technical Publishing, San Diego, 1997.
[6] NOAA, World Meteorological Organization Adopts Con- sensus El Ni?o and La Ni?a index and Definitions, 1995. http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2005/s2428.htm26,
[7] NCDC, The top 10 El Nino Events of the 20th Century, 2011. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/1998/enso/10elnino.html
[8] H. D. I. Abarbanel, “Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995.
[9] Randle Inc. cspW, Tools for Dynamics, Applied Nonlin- ear Sciences, LLC, Randle Inc., Great Falls, 1996.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.