Share This Article:

Many Roads to Paris: A Comparative Review of Pension Policies in Two OECD Countries

Abstract Full-Text HTML Download Download as PDF (Size:233KB) PP. 850-861
DOI: 10.4236/me.2011.25095    4,929 Downloads   7,469 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

Common (neoliberal) wisdom warns against the detrimental effects of demographic changes and fiscal pressures on traditional (both defined-benefit and public) pensions and urges a paradigm shift towards defined- contribution plans and personal retirement accounts. This paper examines these claims, promoted by the OECD and World Bank, among others, by comparing the experiences of two OECD members—Israel and Ireland. While Ireland, one of the founders of the OECD, has pursued typical neoliberal policies of retrenchment, Israel—the newest member of the OECD—has taken a more sinuous path, reversing some retrenchment and eventually making pensions mandatory and almost doubling employer contributions to them. The outcomes of these policies seem to be far more positive in Israel than in Ireland, both in terms of their effects on retirees and workers, as well as their impact via aggregate demand on the overall economy, particularly in the aftermath of the Great Recession.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

J. Assa, "Many Roads to Paris: A Comparative Review of Pension Policies in Two OECD Countries," Modern Economy, Vol. 2 No. 5, 2011, pp. 850-861. doi: 10.4236/me.2011.25095.

References

[1] Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, “Pensions at a Glance 2009: Retirement-Income Systems in OECD Countries,” OECD, 2009.
[2] OECD Website, “About OECD: History,” OECD, 2011. http://www.oecd.org
[3] Israel, Ministry of Finance, “Israel: Ready for the OECD,” March 2006.
[4] OECD, “Roadmap for the Accession of Israel to the OECD Convention,” C (2007)102/FINAL, OECD Council, 3 December 2007.
[5] OECD, “OECD Recommendation on Core Principles of Occupational Pension Regulation,” OECD Council, 5 June 2009.
[6] A. Brender, “Distributive Effects of Israel’s Pension System,” Discussion Paper No. 2009, Bank of Israel Research Department, 10 October 2009, pp. 5-7.
[7] OECD, “OECD Reviews of Labor Markets and Social Policies: Israel,” OECD, 2010.
[8] S. Whelan, “Valuing Ireland’s Pension System,” Quarterly Economic Commentary, Summer 2007, p. 55.
[9] OECD, “OECD Economic Surveys: Ireland,” OECD, 2009.
[10] Ireland, Department of Social and Family Affairs (DSFA), “Green Paper on Pensions: Executive Summary,” Dublin, 2007.
[11] J. B. Williamson and F. C. Pampel, “Old-Age Security in Comparative Perspective,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
[12] Ireland, Central Statistics Office, “Quarterly National Household Survey: Union Membership 1994-2004,” 2010, p. 1.
[13] Y. Cohen, “The State of Organized Labor in Israel,” Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2007, pp. 255-259.
[14] R. K. Weaver, “Cutting Old-Age Pensions,” In: R. K. Weaver, Ed., The Government Taketh Away: The Politics of Pain in the United States and Canada, Georgetown University Press, Georgetown, 2003, pp. 41-43.
[15] T. Ghilarducci, “When I’m Sixty-Four: The Plot against Pensions and the Plan to Save Them,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008.
[16] World Bank, “Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.