Share This Article:

Effect of Photon Flux Density and Exogenous Sucrose on the Photosynthetic Performance during In Vitro Culture of Castanea sativa

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:751KB) PP. 2087-2105
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2016.714187    895 Downloads   1,407 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

The low photon flux density (PFD) under in vitro conditions and sucrose added to the culture medium negatively limits the photochemical activity and photoprotective mechanisms of microshoots. In this work we hypothesize that decreasing sucrose in the culture medium in combination with increasing irradiance, could improve the photosynthesis and consequently the in vitro growth. We evaluated the effect of exogenous sucrose (30 and 5 g·L-1, HS and LS, respectively), under different PFD (50 and 150 μmol photons m-2·s-1, LL and HL, respectively) on the photosynthetic performance and growth of Castanea sativa microshoots. Decreasing sucrose negatively affected the physiological attributes evaluated. Only chloroplast ultrastructure was improved by LS; however this did not lead to an improved in photosynthesis or growth. HL HS produced an increase in photosynthetic activity and chlorophyll contents, reaching under these conditions a higher proliferation rate and biomass production. Additionally, the photochemical activity (electron transport rate and non-photochemical quenching) was improved by HL. Thus, our results suggest that, at least for C. sativa HL is beneficial during the in vitro culture, improving photosynthetic performance as well as growth, but this is only possible in the presence of moderate concentrations of sucrose added to the culture medium.

1. Introduction

Micropropagation technique has become very important in plants production due among others, to its efficiency in the vegetative propagation of species whose macropropagation is difficult, such as woody species. However, these species also present some problems for its micropropagation [1] . These problems include its relative low in vitro growth, significant losses due to contamination, poor rooting and low survival percentages during their ex vitro transference [2] . Most of these characteristics are related to the heterotrophic or mixotrophic plant growth in conventional micropropagation systems [3] . In the last years, some of these problems have been reduced through the development of photoautotrophic systems, which had been associated with the promotion of growth as well as improvements in morphological and physiological attributes [4] beside the possibility of scale-up [3] . However, these systems also have disadvantages associated with the complexity of the technique and high costs associated, besides the limitation to apply this multiplication system using multiple buds/ shoots. Additionally, the scale-up requires a conventional micropropagation system that provides plants with better morpho-physiological attributes. Thus, the success of micropropagation systems in general, requires further study and optimization of the in vitro environment, mainly due to its effects on the processes that determine the in vitro plant growth [5] .

Usually, in vitro culture is carried out in chambers with low photon flux density (PFD), which may limit development of efficient photosynthetic and photoprotective mechanisms [6] [7] . Mechanisms such as heat dissipation and photochemical process that drain the excess electrons accumulated in the inter-system pool allow managing the excess of absorbed light energy [8] [9] . Through these processes, the light energy is used to produce ATP and NADPH in the light reaction and subsequently, in the light independent reaction, carbon is fixed into carbohydrates [10] . Under low PFD, insufficient ATP is produced to allow the carbon fixation and carbohydrate biosynthesis, leading to a reduced plants growth. This makes it necessary to include in the culture medium an external organic carbon source (usually 20 or 30 g∙L−1 sucrose), which would be crucial for in vitro growth [11] [12] . However, it has been reported that sucrose added to the culture medium could have a negative effect on the photosynthetic capacity [13] [14] . This negative effect is based on the concept of balance between processes of sugar consumption and production. Thus, the presence of sugar in the medium decreases the need for sugar production and therefore it should result in lower photosynthetic rates [15] .

Despite evidence respect to the negative effect of sucrose on the photosynthetic performance, there is also evidence regarding the profitability of their use. Indeed, Paul and Stitt [16] argued that the lack of down-regulation in photomixothrophically grown tobacco might be due to the low light regime which results in low photosynthetic rates and a source limitation to growth. This would indicate that the presence of sugar in the culture medium may not be causing the low photosynthetic capacity developed in vitro. In fact, Ticha et al. [17] reported that sucrose increases not only the photosynthetic potential but also the high light resistance of in vitro grown plantlets. So, considering that the PFD used in vitro is a limiting factor for photosynthesis, we hypothesize that the negative effect of sucrose on the photosynthetic capacity of in vitro plants would be dependent on irradiance at which plants are grown. Therefore, decreasing sucrose in the culture medium in combination with increasing irradiance, could improve the photosynthesis performance and consequently the in vitro growth.

Castanea sativa, is a hardwood forest species of valuable agro economic importance [18] . In vitro culture of C. sativa has allowed obtain a large number of individuals and solve the difficulties observed during the traditional macropropagation, due to the recalcitrant condition of this species. Despite significant advances in its micropropagation, and the studies conducted in order to increase the ex vitro survival rates [6] [7] [19] , the effect of the sugars added to the culture medium of has not been evaluated. Based on this, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of exogenous sucrose, under different light conditions, on the photosynthetic performance and growth of Castanea sativa microshoots.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Castanea sativa mature seeds were subjected to a surface asepsis and its embryonic axis was extracted and cultured in vitro on a MS medium modified by a 50% reduction in its macronutrients and kept in darkness until its germination [20] . When the embryos germinated reached a height greater than 1.5 cm and the appearance of chlorophyll tissue was observe (approximately 15 days after its introduction), they were carried to MS medium supplemented with 0.22 µM BAP and 0.024 µM IBA, and 7 g∙L−1 agar, at pH 6.2 and containing: 5 g∙L−1 sucrose (LS) or 30 g∙L−1 sucrose (HS), and were cultured under two different PFD, 50 (LL) and 150 μmol photons m−2∙s−1 (HL). These levels of PFD were choose because correspond to the normal level use in micropropagation of C. sativa [18] and is the recommended level by Saez et al. [19] ; respectively. The culture room environment conditions were 16 h light photoperiod, at 24˚C ± 2˚C and 60% relative humidity. The microshoots were subcultivated every 45 days. After five months under these conditions, well developed microshoots were selected, and their photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and chloroplast ultrastructure were evaluated. In order to evaluate the possible improvements of physiological attribute under each treatment, the results were compared with one year old grown seedlings. They were cultured in an outdoor nursery in black plastic bags filled with organic soil mixed with pine bark compost, maintained beneath a shade cloth (80% solar interception) and irrigated once a day.

2.2. Photosynthetic Performance

Light response curves of net CO2 assimilation at different PFD (from 0 to 1000 µmol photons m−2∙s−1) were measured using an infrared gas analyzer (Ciras-2, PP System, United Kingdom). The CO2 concentration was 360 µg∙g−1, with 200 cm−3∙min−1 of flow, 75% relative humidity and 15˚C to 20˚C of temperature inside the leaf chamber. The notable points of these curves, such as, light compensation point: light compensation point (LCP), net photosynthesis at light saturation (Als) and dark respiration rate (Rd) were obtained using Photosynthesis Assistant 1.1 software (Dundee Scientific, United Kingdom). Additionally, CO2 response curves (from 50 to 1000 ppm) were performed at 15˚C and 20˚C under 500 µmol photons m−2∙s−1, to obtain the carboxylation efficiency (CE) and the maximum rate of net photosynthesis under light and CO2 saturating conditions (Amax). The microshoot leaves were photographed inside the cuvette immediately after they were measured and its area estimated with the Sigma Scan Pro 5.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

2.3. Pigment Content

Pigment determination was made according to Lichtenthaler and Wellburn [21] . Leaf extracts were made using 50 mg fresh weight with 5 cm3 80% acetone. Following extraction, the samples were centrifuged for 3 min at 12,000 rpm and 4˚C. The a and b chlorophyll contents, and total carotenoids were determined spectrophotometrically (Spectronic, Genesys 2).

2.4. In Vitro Growth

The in vitro growth was evaluated through proliferation rate, determined as the number of new microshoots produced by the initially cultured microshoot that were well developed and with a height greater than 2 cm and with at least one expanded leaf. Dry mass production was obtained for each treatment after drying leaves at 60˚C for 72 h.

2.5. Fluorescence Parameters

The photochemical activity was analyzed by the kinetics of chlorophyll fluorescence. This was measured with pulse-amplitude fluorimeter (FMS II, Hansatech Instrument, United Kingdom) in expanded leaves, which were previously dark adapted for 30 min. Different pulses of light were applied following standard routine programmed in the machine. According to the terminology of Rosenqvist and Van Kooten [22] , minimal fluorescence (F0) was determined by applying a weak modulated light (6 µmol photons m−2∙s−1) and maximal fluorescence (Fm), was induced by a short pulse (0.8 s) of saturating light (9000 µmol photons m−2∙s−1). The fluorescence signals were followed until reaching the steady state (Fs). To determine maximal fluorescence in light (Fm’) various pulses of saturating light were applied. The minimal fluorescence (Fo) was determined after turning off the actinic light and immediately a 2 s far red pulse was applied. The electron transport rate (ETR) was calculated according to Genty et al. [23] as: ETR = 0.84 (ΦPSII) (PFD) 0.5; where ΦPSII is effective quantum yield of the PSII, PFD corresponds to incident photosynthetic flux density, the factor 0.5 assumes that the efficiency of both photosystems is equal and that light is equally distributed between them. The factor 0.84 is the mean value of absorbance for green leaves. The fraction of PSII centers in the open state (qL) was calculated as described by Kramer et al. [24] : qL = ((Fm − Fs)/(Fm − Fo)) (Fo/Fs) and the non-photochemical quenching as: NPQ = (Fm − Fm)/Fm [25] . The fluorescence measurements were performed at PFDs of 10, 50, 75, 100, 150, 250, 450, 600 and 900 µmol photons m−2∙s−1.

2.6. Chloroplast Ultrastructure

Chloroplast ultrastructure was analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Leaf sections of 1 mm2 were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde, and post fixation with 1% osmium tetroxide. Then, they were analyzed with TEM (MET Jeol, JEM1200 EXII) at a voltage intensity of 60 kV. The photomicrographs were analyzed using Image J software. Chloroplast area (µm2), grana per chloroplasts (N˚), grana area (µm2) and thylakoid per chloroplast (N˚) were evaluated.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The effect of sucrose (5 or 30 g∙L−1), light intensity (150 or 50 μmol photons m−2∙s−1) and their interaction on physiological characteristics of in vitro cultured microshoots were studied using a factorial experimental design. All experiments were arranged in completely randomized design. Experimental units corresponded to a culture vessel containing a single microshoot and in each analysis at least three random measurements were made. A two-way analysis of variances was used to test for significance at P ≤ 0.05. Differences among means were established using LSD test. Additionally, one-way ANOVA was used to test significant differences in physiological traits among each in vitro treatment and seedlings.

3. Results

3.1. Photosynthetic Performance

A significant increase in photosynthesis at light saturation (Figure 1(A)) as well as in photosynthetic capacity (Figure 1(B)) was observed when a high sucrose addition was combined with a higher PFD (P < 0.05). Thus, photomixotrophic condition (HL HS) surpassing the other treatments, reached rate of 3.52 and 4.45 µmol CO2 m2∙s−1 in Als and Amax, respectively. The light saturation (Figure 1(C)) and Rubisco carboxylation efficiency (Figure 1(F)) showed the same trend. So the treatment with higher photosynthetic capacity (HL HS), reached light saturation above 200 µmol photons m2 s−1, unlike that seen in other treatments which did not exceed 160 µmol photons m2 s−1. Regarding the light compensation point (Figure 1(D)) and dark respiration rate (Figure 1(E)), the factors evaluated did not produce significant differences.

3.2. Pigment Content

The pigment contents responded to sucrose concentration and PFD, as well to an interaction between them (Table 1). Apparently, the effect of sucrose on the total chlorophyll content was dependent of PFD. Thus, when plants grown at LL, sucrose had no significant effect on chlorophyll content, while at HL the decrease of sucrose resulted in a decrease of total chlorophyll content. The same trends were observed for both chlorophyll a and b. Thus, the highest production of chlorophylls (a + b) was observed in

Figure 1. Photosynthetic parameters obtained from light and CO2 response curves of microshoot of C. sativa culture under different sucrose concentrations and PFD. (A) Net photosynthesis at light saturating (Als); (B) Photosynthetic capacity (Amax); (C) Light saturation point (LSP); (D) Light compensation point (LCP); (E) Dark respiration rate (Rd) and (F), carboxilation efficiency (CE). Means ± S.E., n = 3. ***indicates the significant effect of sucrose factor at P < 0.05. Different letters indicate significant differences among each in vitro treatment and seedlings at P < 0.05 in one way ANOVA. Mean ± S.E., n = 3.

Table 1. Pigment content (mg∙g−1 FW) of in vitro cultured microshoot leaves of C. sativa grown under different sucrose concentration and PFD. Different letters indicate significant differences among each in vitro treatment and seedlings at P < 0.05 in one way ANOVA. Mean ± S.E., n = 4.

Chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), total carotenoids (Cart), total chlorophyll (a + b). ***refers to factor’s significance at P ≤ 0.001; **at P ≤ 0.01; *P < 0.05 and ns, no significant in two way ANOVA.

photomixotrophic conditions (HL HS). Under these conditions, the total chlorophyll was about twice that found in other in vitro treatments, and even greater than those determined in seedlings. The carotenoids content did not differ among in vitro treatments and was also similar to that observed in seedlings.

3.3. In Vitro Growth

Randomly chosen Castanea sativa microshoots grown under different sucrose and PFD conditions are shown in Figure 2. Plants grown on HS showed robust growth, mainly in HL HS where in addition there was a higher development of leaf area. In contrast at LS, the plants had a lower growth, mainly in HL LS, where besides a slight yellowing of the leaves was observed. The biomass production measured as dry matter production (Figure 3(A)) was determined by PFD factor (P < 0.05), so regardless of the sucrose concentration, the increase in light caused an increase in the dry weight percentage. In contrast, the proliferation rate of new microshoots (Figure 3(B)), evaluated after four months of in vitro culture was significantly determined by the sucrose concentration added to the culture medium (P < 0.001). Thus, the smallest sucrose addition did not produce increase in this parameter which was even lower that one. However with high sucrose addition there was an active proliferation reaching up three new microshoots by initial microshoot produced.

3.4. Fluorescence Parameters

The photochemical activity was evaluated through of chlorophyll a fluorescence. The electron transport rate (ETR) (Figure 4(A)) was significantly higher in microshoots produced with both high sucrose and PFD (HL HS), surpassing values observed in seedlings. In this treatment, ETR increased linearly until 300 µmol photons m−2∙s−1 peaking close to 110 µmol electrons m−2∙s−1. Lower values were observed in LS treat-

Figure 2. Randomly chosen Castanea sativa microshoots grown under low light and high sucrose (LL HS), low light and low sucrose (LL LS), high light and high sucrose (HL HS) and high light and low sucrose (HL LS).

Figure 3. Dry matter (A) and proliferation rate (B) of Castanea sativa grown under different sucrose concentrations and PFD. ***Significant differences between LS (5 g∙L−1) and HS (30 g∙L−1) at P < 0.05.

Figure 4. Electron transport rate (ETR) (A), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) (B) and relative redox state of PSII (qL) (C) from leaves of C. sativa grown under different sucrose concentrations and PFD and seedlings. Values are mean ± S.E, n = 5.

ments, where the ETR showed a maximum value near to 60 µmol of electrons m−2∙s−1. In these treatments the ETR saturation was near 300 µmol photons m−2∙s−1 and remained constant up to 900 µmol photons m−2∙s−1. Regarding the thermal dissipation capacity, the NPQ (Figure 4(B)) obtained under different in vitro culture conditions, were significantly lower than those observed in seedlings. However, it was observed that HL treatments showed an increase in heat dissipation. These latter treatments presented the highest values close to 1.5 which is three orders higher than normally seen in conventional micropropagation systems of C. sativa (LL HS). Finally, regarding to photochemical quenching (qL), differences were noted among different treatments (Figure 4(C)). In LL HS, the qL showed a rapid decrease from dark to about 200 µmol photons m−2∙s−1, exhibiting afterwards very low values, which reflects the little photochemical light conversion capacity of these microshoots at light intensities greater than 200 µmol photons m−2∙s−1, this imply that more than 90% of Qa is maintained in the reduced state creating a high excitation pressure on PSII. The LS treatments showed a similar pattern to seedlings, only being overtaken by microshoots developed under HL HS. It is noteworthy that the excitation pressure at low ACTINIC LIGHT was significantly lower in microshoots THAN in seedlings.

3.5. Chloroplast Ultrastructure

In the chloroplast ultrastructure and organization of thylakoidal membranes, sucrose concentration added to culture medium significantly influenced the parameters evaluate and there was also a significant interaction between sucrose and PFD factors (Table 2). The size chloroplast was higher in HS treatments and only in HL HS treatment was similar to those observed in seedlings. Regarding the membranes organization, the effect of sucrose concentration was dependent on PFD in which microshoots were grown. Here the largest number of grana (similar to that observed in seedlings) was obtained in LL LS, and under this treatment was also reached the highest granum size. Additionally, the biggest stacking was obtained in LS treatments, mainly in LL. A clear granal stacking was not possible to distinguish in LL HS treatment; rather a network of stromall lamellas was observed. Starch granules were observed only in LL LS treatment (Figure 5). In HL treatments starch deposition was not observed. However, it

Table 2. Chloroplast characteristics of in vitro cultured microshoot leaves of C. sativa grown under different sucrose concentrations and PFD. Different letters indicates significant differences among each in vitro treatment and seedlings at P < 0.05 in one way ANOVA. Mean ± S.E., n = 10.

Chloroplast area (Chl), grana per chloroplasts (Gr chlp−1), grana area (Gr area), thylakoid per chloroplast (Thyl Gr−1). ***refers to factor’s significance at P ≤ 0.001; **at P ≤ 0.01; *P < 0.05 and ns, no significant in two way ANOVA.

Figure 5. Electron micrographs of mesophyll cell chloroplasts of microshoot leaves of Castanea sativa grown under: low light and high sucrose (LL HS), low light and low sucrose (LL LS), high light and high sucrose (HL HS), high light and low sucrose (HL LS) and seedlings. Bars in left and right represent 1 and 0.5 µm, respectively.

was possible to observe the presence of plastoglobuli, similar to those observed in chloroplasts of seedlings (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

As outlined, the effect of sucrose was dependent on light intensity to which the culture was developed. Thus, our results suggest that at least in Castanea sativa, sucrose has a positive effect. Although it has been hypothesized that sucrose causes a down-regula- tion of photosynthesis [14] [26] [27] our result shown that the photosynthetic performance was improved by sucrose (Figure 1(A) and Figure 1(B)). However, this positive effect was only significant (P < 0.05) when the culture was carried out under higher PFD (HL HS). According to Paul and Stitt [16] the down-regulation as a consequence of the sucrose addition to the culture medium might be due to the low light regime which result in low photosynthetic rates and a source limitation to growth. However, in this case, down-regulation was always given by a lower sucrose addition, even when light regime was increased, and became more evident under this condition. This according to Ticha et al. [17] indicates that the source may not be a limiting factor. Kovtun and Daie [28] observed that the addition of sucrose accelerates the sink to source transition, suggesting that this effect prevents the down-regulation of photosynthesis. Thus, it is likely that the problem is not the source but rather sink limitation, and the enhanced development of photo mixotrophically grown plants increases the capacity to use carbohydrates.

It is well established that the initial slope of CO2 response curve, is an indirect measure of Rubisco carboxylation efficiency [29] . In this regard, carboxylation efficiency (Figure 1(F)) showed the same trend that Als and Amax (Figure 1). The high CE determined in HL HS coincided with the increased carbon assimilation observed in this treatment. This disagrees with Fuentes et al. [14] , who informs that lower value of CE was found in plantlets with high exogenous sucrose, suggesting their lower ability to assimilate CO2. In fact, several researches suggest that the negative effect of sucrose on plantlet´s photosynthesis is a result of a decrease in Rubisco efficiency [14] [30] [31] . However, our result indicates that besides the presence of sugar in the culture medium, the activity exhibit by Rubisco in tissue culture systems could be modulated by other factors, like light. Some results indicated PFD as a primary factor in the low activity of Rubisco [31] . Low light level may have an effect on trans-thylakoid ΔpH, which affects Rubisco activase, leading to a reduce capacity to displace inhibitors bound to the carbamate [32] [33] .

It has been shown that the plantlets in vitro can achieve photoautotrophic growth by increasing Light intensity without sucrose [14] [34] [35] . Our result shown that the increase PFD (from 50 to 150 µmol photons m−2∙s−1) is not enough for increase photosynthesis when sucrose added to the culture medium is reduced (from 30 to 5 g∙L−1). Low sucrose concentration at low PFD (LL LS) had no effect on chlorophyll content, similar to the result found in the photosynthetic performance (Table 1), but when PFD increased, sucrose was necessary to increase chlorophyll content. Thus, higher chlorophyll content was determined by HL HS treatment, with similar values than those observed in seedlings. This was similar to that reported by Ticha et al. [17] who found higher chlorophyll content in tobacco plantlets photomixotrophically growth. The chlorophyll content may influence the plants ability to maximize the light harvesting capacity [32] [36] . It is one of the most important factors in determining the photosynthetic rates [37] . In fact, under photomixotrophic conditions (HL HS) higher chlorophyll content was concomitant with higher Als, Amax, LSP and CE (Figure 1).

The increase in photosynthetic activity promoted by the HL HS produced also an increased in microshoots growth. The explants development, mainly leaf area (Figure 2) and the biomass production (Figure 3(A)) were greater when larger amount of exogenous sucrose and high PFD were used. Previous studies already revealed the importance of sucrose for culture growth, accounts for 75% to 85% of the biomass increase [38] . According to Eckstein et al. [39] which accounts increasing sugar concentration has a visibly stronger influence on leaf area than on leaf number and according these authors; sugar present in the medium would be use mainly as a carbon source for biomass production and does not play a major signaling role in development. The same authors reported that plants grown on medium without sugar were small and their development was delayed, independent of the sugar kind (sucrose or glucose) or its concentration (10 or 30 g∙L−1). However plants developed slightly different phenotypes depending on the irradiance. Thus, plants growth at irradiances lower than 30 µmol photons m−2∙s−1 had smaller leaves, but plants grown at higher irradiance (100 to 300 µmol photons m−2∙s−1) were well developed and reached the biggest dimensions, like in our results. Proliferation rate (Figure 3(B)) was also positively affected by HS, this supports the idea of greater utilization of exogenous sugars in growth, as new microshoots formation (Figure 3) as well microshoots photosynthetically more competent (Figure 1). Additionally, sugars provide the energy source and the building blocks for plant’s metabolism and act as regulatory molecules controlling physiology, metabolism, development, and the expression of genes in all living cells [40] [41] . Several researches have suggested that sugars act as active messengers promoting or inhibiting plant genes implicated in many fundamental processes including photosynthesis, respiration, carbon and nitrogen metabolism, pathogen defense, wounding response, control of cell cycle, and senescence [42] [43] . However, in in vitro culture these phenomena are still poorly investigated [39] [40] .

On the hand, it is probably that at low sucrose, the increase in PFD result harmful to growth plant, because the low chlorophylls contents produce under these conditions would reduce the photosynthesis in vitro by decreasing light energy absorption [12] . Thus leaf yellowing was observed in HL LS (Figure 2) suggesting that this light intensity may occasion damage or inactivation of the photosynthetic system, or according to the low LSP found (Figure 1(C)), this condition likely provided excess light causing an energy imbalance and promoting photoinhibition or photodamage. Given that the increase irradiance produced no apparent damage when was combined with high sucrose, this means that sugar works as photoprotective, allowing the plants to overcome the stress and photodamage caused by higher irradiances [41] . Additionally, the higher growth observed in HL HS would help to replace the damage photosystems and to consume a surplus of assimilate [44] .

HL HS also promotes the accumulation of chlorophylls, which determines the dry mater production [45] . According to Sestak [46] , this is product particularly of chlorophyll a content, which is more involved in determining photosynthetic activity. This is important because the photosynthesis, how responsible for the plant`s energy and carbon incorporation into the plant, is crucial for its survival [47] , for example during the ex vitro transference [14] .

Regarding photochemical activity, our result indicates that increase in PFD produced an increase in electron transport rate (Figure 4(A)), and this increase was more pronounced when the sucrose addition was higher. Despite the high ETR observed in HL treatments, which exceeded those found in seedlings, carbon assimilation never reached rate obtained in seedlings (Figure 1(B)). According to Mohamed and Alsadon [12] , the chloroplasts could have light stimulated electron transport but lower level of photosynthetic activity resulting in low carbon assimilation in in vitro plants. Respect to mechanism for managing the excess light energy, Demmig-Adams et al. [48] reported that once light has been absorbed, this may be achieved by thermal dissipation of excess absorbed energy (non photochemical quenching, NPQ) or through the photochemical use of the energy (photochemical quenching, qL). In NPQ (Figure 4(B)) the same behavior that ETR was found, showing higher values in HL treatments, without difference between high or low sucrose. Additionally, in these treatments it was possible to observe plastoglobuli accumulation, similar to that found in seedlings. However, NPQ was significantly lower that seedlings, reflecting the already reported poor ability of in vitro plants to handle the excess light energy [6] [49] [50] . Probably because to develop these mechanisms is not only necessary to grow under stable levels of high irradiance, but also the occurrence of increased light intensity events (PFD variability), that triggers the development of photoprotective mechanisms as adaptive strategy. It may be also possible that light signals from different light quality other than that provided by light bulbs in growth chamber and that would be necessary to trigger photoprotective mechanisms. In fact, in nature, the high variability in photon flux density and their spectral composition, trigger dynamics acclimation responses, among them NPQ, state transitions and long-term response, that allows respond to a very broad range of conditions [51] .

The photochemical quenching (qL) is associated with the potential at a given PFD to execute photochemical conversion of light energy to drive electrons through the intersystem pool. In LLHS, the qL showed a rapid decrease from dark to about 200 µmol photons m−2∙s−1, exhibiting afterwards very low values, which reflects the little photochemical light conversion capacity of these plants at light intensities greater than 200 µmol photons m−2∙s−1 (Figure 4(C)). This implies that more than 90% of Qa are maintained in the reduced state creating a high excitation pressure for PSII [52] . These results are consistent with the lower ETR observed at saturating PFD. In contrast, HL HS treatment, qL remained high, even higher than that observed in seedlings, maintaining a lower excitation pressure on PSII than the other treatments.

Additional to functional attributes, sucrose and PFD affected anatomical attributes related to chloroplast ultrastructure. Thus, as size as well membrane organizations into the chloroplast were affected (Table 2). As reported by Lee et al. [53] chloroplasts of in vitro plants cultured under low light (50 µmol photons m−2∙s−1) were flattened and devoid of organized grana, and when PFD increased (300 µmol photons m−2∙s−1) well organized granas were observed (Table 2 and Figure 5). However, our result indicated that thylakoid’s organization varied according to sucrose and PFD used. Thus at LS, grana number per chloroplast increased. These grana had a greater area and thylakoids number, these features were enhanced at LL. Similar results were report by Serret and Trillas [54] working with different sucrose and light level in Gardenia jasminoides. Additionally, in TEM analysis (Figure 5) was only possible observe starch accumulation under LL LS treatment. According to Capellades et al. [55] , the starch might be responsible for the lower photosynthesis rate. However these authors report that the size and number of starch granules increased with the level of sucrose. So, when the sugar export from the leaf is reduced, it will be stored in these organs. An explanation for the inhibition of photosynthesis might be the low rate of regeneration of the carboxylation substrate RuBP due to the accumulation of soluble sugar in the leaves [56] . Our results indicate that in LL LS an increase in the starch granules was concomitant with lower net photosynthesis. By contrast at HS starch accumulation was not observed, it is likely that the storage here is unnecessary because of the continued presence of a carbon source, which are used in growth.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, although low exogenous sucrose produced an improvement on the thylakoidal organization membranes, which could imply an improvement of the photosynthetic apparatus, structure did not produce an improvement on photosynthetic performance and negatively affected the in vitro growth of Castanea sativa plantlets. Thus, none of functional and growth parameters evaluated were improved by decreasing sucrose, even when this decrease was accompanied by increases in PFD. Additionally, no assessed treatments produce more competent microshoots from the point of view of their similarity to plants grown in nursery conditions (seedlings). The results confirmed that using sucrose as external source of carbohydrates during proliferation stage of Castanea sativa microshoots had a positive effect on photosynthesis, chlorophyll content and growth, similar to that reported by Cournac et al. [56] ; Paul and Stitt [16] ; and Ticha et al. [17] . With this knowledge it is possible to establish strategies of mixotrophic culture that lead to production of competent microshoot during in vitro culture and, consequently, minimize the transfer stress and maximize the ex vitro survival rates.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Projects INNOVA BIOBIO N˚4 B3-234 and DIUC 210.142.029-1.0 for the financial support of this work. Patricia L. Sáez thanks CONICYT for her doctoral fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Sáez, P. , Bravo, L. , Sánchez-Olate, M. , Bravo, P. and Ríos, D. (2016) Effect of Photon Flux Density and Exogenous Sucrose on the Photosynthetic Performance during In Vitro Culture of Castanea sativa. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 7, 2087-2105. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2016.714187.

References

[1] Lal, M., Tiwari, A.K. and Gupta, G.N. (2015) Commercial Scale Micropropagation of Sugarcane: Constraints and Remedies. Sugar Tech, 4, 339-347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12355-014-0345-y
[2] Kozai, T. and Kubota, C. (2001) Development a Photoautotrophic Micropropagation System for Woody Plants. Journal of Plant Research, 114, 525-537.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00014020
[3] Xiao, Y., Niu, G. and Kozai, T. (2011) Development and Application of Photoautotrophic Micropropagation Plant System. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 105, 149-158.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9863-9
[4] Kozai, T. and Kubota, C. (2005) Concepts, Definitions, Ventilation Methods, Advantages and Disadvantages. In: Kozai, T., Afreen, F. and Zobayed, S.M.A., Eds., Photoautotrophic (Sugar-Free Medium) Micropropagation as a New Propagation and Transplant Production System, Springer, Dordrecht, 19-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3126-2_3
[5] Waman, A., Bohra. P., Sathyanarayana, B., Umesha, K., Mukunda, G.K., Ashok, T.H. and Gowda, B. (2015) Optimization of Factors Affecting In Vitro Establishment, Ex Vitro Rooting and Hardening for Commercial Scale Multiplication of Silk Banana (Musa AAB). Erwerbs-Obstbau, 57, 153-164.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10341-015-0244-8
[6] Sáez, P., Bravo, L., Sáez, K., Sánchez-Olate, M., Latsague, M. and Ríos, D. (2012) Photosynthetic and Leaf Anatomical Characteristics of Castanea sativa: A Comparison between In Vitro and Nursery Plants. Biologia Plantarum, 56, 15-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10535-012-0010-9
[7] Sáez, P., Bravo, L., Latsague, M., Toneatti, M., Sánchez-Olate, M. and Ríos, D. (2013) Light Energy Management in Micropropagated Plants of Castanea sativa, Effects of Photoinhibition. Plant Science, 201-202, 12-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.11.008
[8] Horton, P. and Ruban, A. (2005) Molecular Design of the Photosystem II Light-Harvesting Antenna: Photosynthesis and Photoprotection. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 365-373.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri023
[9] Walters, R.G. (2005) Towards an Understanding of Photosynthetic Acclimation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 435-441.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri060
[10] Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. (2002) Plant Physiology. 3rd Edition, Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, Sunderland, MA, USA.
[11] Yasodha, R., Kamala, S., Kumar, S.P.A., Kumar, D.P. and Kalaiarasi, K. (2008) Effect of Glucose on In Vitro Rooting of Mature Plants of Bambusa nutans. Scientia Horticulturae, 116, 113-116.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.10.025
[12] Mohamed, M. and Alsadon, A.A. (2010) Influence of Ventilation and Sucrose on Growth and Leaf Anatomy of Micropropaged Potato Plantlets. Scientia Horticulturae, 123, 295-300.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.09.014
[13] Santamaría, J.M., Lavergne, D., Trabelsi, S., Verdeil, J.L., Rival, A., Hamon, S. and Nato, A. (1999) Effect of Sucrose in the Medium, on the Photosynthetic Capacity of Coconut Vitroplants Derived from Zygotic Embryos. In: Recent Advances in Coconut Biotechnology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 371-382.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9283-3_27
[14] Fuentes, G., Talavera, C., Oropeza, C., Desjardins, Y. and Santamaria, J. (2005) Exogenous Sucrose Can Decrease In Vitro Photosynthesis but Improve Field Survival and Growth of Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) In Vitro Plantlets. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 41, 69-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/IVP2004597
[15] Koch, K.E. (1996) Carbohydrate-Modulated Gene Expression in Plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 47, 509-540.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.509
[16] Paul, M. and Stitt, M. (1993) Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Deficiences on Levels of Carbohydrates, Respiratory Enzymes and Metabolites in Seedlings of Tobacoo and Their Response to Exogenoues Sucrose. Plant, Cell & Environment, 16, 1047-1057.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb02062.x
[17] Tichá, I., Cáp, F., Pacosvská, D., Hofman, P., Haisel, D., Capková, V. and Schafer, C. (1998) Culture on Sugar Medium Enhances Photosynthesis Capacity and High Light Resistance of Plantlets Grown In Vitro. Physiologia Plantarum, 102, 155-162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1020201.x
[18] Carvalho, L. and Amancio, S. (2002) Effect of Ex Vitro Conditions on Growth and Adcquisition of Autotrophic Behaviour during the Acclimatisation of Chestnut Regenerated In Vitro. Scientia Horticulturae, 95, 151-164.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00037-7
[19] Sáez, P., Bravo, L., Latsague, M., Sánchez-Olate, M. and Ríos, D. (2012b) Increased Light Intensity during In Vitro Culture Improves Water Loss Control and Photosynthetic Performance of Castanea sativa Grown in Ventilated Vessels. Scientia Horticulturae, 138, 7-16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.02.005
[20] Hasbun, R. (2006) Micropropagación de cultivares de Castanea sativa Mill., partir de material embrionario. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
[21] Lichtenthaler, H. and Wellburn, A. (1983) Determinations of Total Carotenoids and Chlorophylls a and b of Leaf Extracts in Different Solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions, 603, 591-592.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bst0110591
[22] Rosenqvist, E. and Van Kooten, O. (2003) Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A General Description and Nomenclature. In: DeEll, J.R. and Toivonen, P.M.A., Eds., Practical Applications of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Plant Biology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 31-37.
[23] Genty, B., Briantais, J.M. and Baker, N.R. (1989) The Relationship between the Quantum Yield of Photosynthetic Electron Transport and Quenching of Chlorophyll Fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects, 990, 87-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9
[24] Kramer, D., Johnson, G., Kiirats, O. and Edwards, G. (2004) New Fluorescence Parameters for the Determination of QA Redox State and Excitation Energy Fluxes. Photosynthesis Research, 79, 209-218.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:PRES.0000015391.99477.0d
[25] Maxwell, K. and Johnson, G.N. (2000) Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Practical Guide. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 659-668.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659
[26] Le Van, Q., Samson, G. and Desjardins, Y. (2001) Opposite Effects of Exogenous Sucrose on Growth, Photosynthesis and Carbon Metabolism of in Vitro Plantlets of Tomato (L. esculentum Mill.) Grown under Two Levels of Irradiances and CO2 Concentrations. Journal of Plant Physiology, 158, 599-605.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00315
[27] Mosaleeyanon, K., Cha-um, S. and Kirdmanee, C. (2004) Enhanced Growth and Photosynthesis of Rain Tree (Samanea saman Merr.) Plantlets in Vitro under a CO2-Enriched Condition with Decreased Sucrose Concentration in the Medium. Scientia Horticulturae, 103, 51-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2004.02.010
[28] Kovtun, Y. and Daie, J. (1995) End-Product Control of Carbon Metabolism in Culture Sugar Beet Plants. Plant Physiology, 108, 1647-1656.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.4.1647
[29] Von Caemmerer, S. and Farquhar, G.D. (1981) Some Relationship between the Biochemistry of Photosynthesis and the Gas Exchange of Leaves. Planta, 153, 376-387.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00384257
[30] Hdider, C. and Desjardins, Y. (1994) Reduction of Ribulose-1,5-Biphosphater Carboxylase/ Oxigenase Efficiency by the Presence of Sucrose during the Tissue Culture of Strawberry Plants. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 31, 165-170.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02632014
[31] Desjardins, Y. (1995) Photosynthesis in Vitro: On the Factor Regulating CO2 Assimilation in Micropropagation Systems. ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 393, 45-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.393.5
[32] Portis, A.R. (1992) Regulation of Ribulose 1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase actIvity. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 43, 415-437.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.43.060192.002215
[33] Galmés, J., Aranjuelo, I., Medrano, H. and Flexas, J. (2013) Variation in Rubisco Content and Activity under Variable Climatic Factors. Photosynthesis Research, 117, 73-90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11120-013-9861-y
[34] Serret, M.D., Trillas, M.I., Mata, J. and Araus, J.L. (1996) Development of Photoautotrophy and Photoinhibition of Gardenia jasminoides Plantlets during Micropropagation. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 45, 1-16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00043422
[35] Posada, L., Padrón, Y., González, J., Rodríguez, R., Norman, O., Barbón, R., Hurtado, O., Rodriguez, R., Daniels, C. and Gómez-Kosky, R. (2015) Effects of Different Culture Conditions (Photoautotrophic, Photomixotrophic) and the Auxin Indole-Butyric Acid on the in Vitro Acclimatization of Papaya (Carica papaya L. var. Red Maradol) Plants Using Zeolite as Support. African Journal of Biotechnology, 14, 2622-2635.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB2015.14814
[36] Shao, Q.S., Wang, H.Z., Guo, H.P., Zhou, A., Huang, Y.Q., Sun, Y.L. and Li, M.Y. (2014) Effects of Shade Treatments on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Chloroplast Ultrastructure, and Physiology of Anoectochilus roxburghii. PLoS ONE, 2, e85996.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085996
[37] Mao, L.Z., Lu, H.F., Wang, Q. and Cai, M.M. (2007) Comparative Photosynthesis Characteristics of Calycanthus chinensis and Chimonanthus praecox. Photosynthetica, 45, 601-605.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11099-007-0103-4
[38] De Riek, J., Piqueras, A. and Debergh, P. (1997) Sucrose Uptake and Metabolism in a Double Layer System for Micropropagation of Rosa multiflora. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 47, 269-278.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02318982
[39] Eckstein, A., Zieba, P. and Gabrys, H. (2012) Sugar and Light Effects on the Condition of the Photosynthetic Apparatus of Arabidopsis thaliana Cultured in Vitro. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 31, 90-101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-011-9222-z
[40] Badr, A. and Desjardins, Y. (2007) Sugar Uptake and Metabolism in Tissue Cultured Potato Plantlets Cultured in Liquid Medium. ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 748, 265-273.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2007.748.36
[41] Pessoni, R.A., Tersarotto, C.C., Mateus, C.A., Zerlin, J.K., Simooes, K., de Cássia, L., Figueiredo-Ribeiro, R. and Braga, M.R. (2015) Fructose Affecting Morphology and Inducing β-Fructofuranosidases in Penicillium janczewskii. SpringerPlus, 4, 487.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1298-7
[42] Herbers, K., Monke, G., Badur, R. and Sonnewald, U. (1995) A Simplified Procedure for the Subtractive cDNA Cloning of Photoassimilate-Responding Genes: Isolation of cDNAs Encoding a New Class of Pathogenesis-Related Proteins. Plant Molecular Biology, 29, 1027-1038.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00014975
[43] Mita, S., Suzuki-Fujii, K. and Nakamura, K. (1995) Sugar-Inducible Expression of a Gene for β-Amylase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology, 107, 895-904.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.3.895
[44] Hazarika, B. (2006) Morpho-Physiological Disorders in in Vitro Culture of Plants. Scientia Horticulturae, 108, 105-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.01.038
[45] Ghosh, P.K., Ramesh, P., Bandyopadhay, K.K., Tripathi, A.K., Hati, K.M. and Misra, A.K. (2004) Comparative Effectiveness of Cattle Manure, Poultry Manure, Phosphocompost and Fertilizer-NPK on Three Cropping Systems in Vertisoils of Semi-Arid Tropic. I. Crop Yields and Systems in Performance. Bioresource Technology, 95, 77-83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.011
[46] Sestak, Z. (1996) Limitations for Finding Linear Relationship between Chlorophyll Content and Photosynthetic Activity. Biologia Plantarum, 8, 336-346.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02930670
[47] Rodríguez, R., Aragón, A., Escalona, M., González, J. and Desjardins, Y. (2008) Carbon Metabolism in Leaves of Micropropagated Sugarcane during Acclimatization Phase. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 44, 533-539.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11627-008-9142-1
[48] Demmig-Adams, B., Gilmore, A. and Adams, W. (1996) Carotenoids 3: In Vivo Functions of Carotenoids in Higher Plants. The FASEB Journal, 10, 403-412.
[49] Osório, M., Osório, J. and Romano, A. (2010) Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Micropropagated Rhododendron ponticum subsp. baeticum Plants in Response to Different Irradiances. Biologia Plantarum, 54, 415-422.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10535-010-0076-1
[50] álvarez, C., Sáez, P., Sánchez-Olate, M. and Ríos, D. (2012) Effects of Light and Ventilation on Physiological Parameters during in Vitro Acclimatization of Gevuina avellana mol. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 110, 93-101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0133-x
[51] Dietzel, L., Brautigam, K. and Pfannschmidt, T. (2008) Photosynthetic Acclimation: State Transition and Adjustment of Photosystem Stoichiometry—Functional Relationship between Short-Term and Long-Term Light Quality Acclimation in Plants. The FEBS Journal, 275, 1080-1088.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06264.x
[52] Hüner, N.P.A., Oquist, G. and Sarhan, F. (1998) Energy Balance and Acclimation to Light and Cold. Trends in Plant Science, 3, 224-230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01248-5
[53] Lee, N., Wetzstein, H.Y. and Sommer, H.E. (1985) Effects of Quantum Flux Density on Photosynthesis and Chloroplast Ultrastructure in Tissue-Cultured Plantlets and Seedlings of Liquidambar styraciflua L. towards Improved Acclimatization and Field Survival. Plant Physiology, 78, 637-641.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.78.3.637
[54] Serret, M.D. and Trillas, M.I. (2000) Effects of Light and Sucrose Levels on the Anatomy, Ultrastructure, and Photosynthesis of Gardenia jasminoides Ellis Leaflets Cultured in Vitro. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 161, 281-289.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/314251
[55] Capellades, M., Fontarnau, R., Carulla, C. and Debergh, P. (1991) Environment Influences Anatomy of Stomata and Epidermal Cells in Tissue Cultured Rosa multiflora. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 115, 141-145.
[56] Cournac, L., Dimon, B., Carrier, P., Lohou, A. and Chagvardieff, P. (1991) Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristic of Solanum tuberosum Plantlets Cultivated in Vitro under Different Conditions of Aeration, Sucrose Supply, and CO2 Enrichment. Plant Physiology, 97, 112-117.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.97.1.112

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.