Share This Article:

Opportunities, Constraints and Future Implication of Biotechnology in Animlal Feed Improvement

Abstract PP. 1-7
DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1100493    994 Downloads   1,666 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment


The major cause of poor livestock productivity in tropical regions of the world is inadequate nutrition. The shortage of feed in most developing countries and the increasing cost of feed constituents entail that there is a call for to improvement feed utilization strategies in developing countries. Animal feeds and feeding practices can be enhanced by biotechnology to develop better animal nutrition packages in smallholder and commercial production systems as well as to reduce environmental waste. Roughages are the major diets of farm animals, particularly ruminants in the tropics; hence, improving the nutritive value of such kind of feed is very important for best utilization. Among application of biotechnology, roughage improvement using a non-toxic fungus has been practiced in many countries. The white rot fungi have been used especially because of their ability to delignify the plant material. The other application of biotechnology is to produce genetically modified fodder crops of vast benefits to consumers as well as environment like that of food crops. Another area of nutritional biotechnology is the successful attempt in the use of genetically modified micro organisms to enhance rumen fermentation and thereby increase nutrient availability to the host animal. The ultimate goal of using biotechnology in animal feeds and feeding systems is then to improve the plane of nutrition through the use of enzymes to improve the availability of from feed and to reduce the wastage of the feed. Though application of biotechnology has various opportunities, it is not easily expanded due to prevailing environmental and social constraints of developing countries in the tropics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Asmare, B. (2014) Opportunities, Constraints and Future Implication of Biotechnology in Animlal Feed Improvement. Open Access Library Journal, 1, 1-7. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1100493.


[1] Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2003) World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030. An FAO Perspective.
[2] Hsu, J.T., Fahey Jr., G.C., Merchen, N.R. and Mackie, R.I. (1991) Effects of Defaunation and Various Nitrogen Supplementation Regimens on Microbial Numbers and Activity in the Rumen of Sheep. Journal of Animal Science, 69, 1279-1289.
[3] Ruane, J. and Zimmermann, M. (2001) Report of the First Six E-Mail Conferences of the FAO Electronic Forum on Biotechnology in Food and Agriculture.
[4] UN (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization) (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity, 30.
[5] NRC (National Research Council) (2001) Emerging Technologies to Benefit Farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. National Academies Press, Washington DC.
[6] MacMillan, S. (1996) Improving the Nutritional Status of Tropical Ruminants. Biotechnology and Development Monitor, 27, 8-9.
[7] Zadrazil, F., Puniya, A.K. and Singh, K. (1995) Biological Upgrading of Feed Components. In: Wallae, R.J., Chesson, A. and Weinheim, V.C.H. (Eds.), Biotechnology in Animal Feeding, 55-69.
[8] Leng, R.A. (1991) Application of Biotechnology to Nutrition of Animals in Developing Countries. Animal Production and Health Paper 90, FAO, Rome.
[9] McDonald, P., Edwards, R.A., Greenhalgh, J.F.D., Morgan, C.A., Sinclair, L.A. and Wilkinson, R.G. (2010) Animal Nutrition. Pearson Books.
[10] Sharp, R., O’Donnell, A.G., Gilbert, H.J. and Hazlewood, G.P. (1992) Growth and Survival of Genetically Manipulated Lactobacillus Plantarum in Silage. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 58, 2517-2522.
[11] Lebbie, S.H.B. and Kagwini, E. (1996) Small Ruminant Research and Development in Africa. Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the African Small Ruminant Research Network, UICC, Kampala, 5-9 December 1994, 326 p.
[12] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome (1978) Treating Straw for Animal Feeding. Rome.
[13] Wallace, R.J. and Newbold, C.J. (1992) Probiotics for Ruminants. In: Fuller, R., Ed., Probiotics, the Scientific Basis, Chapman and Hall, London, 317-353.
[14] Kim, J.H., Hosobuchi, M., Kishimoto, M., Seki, T., Yoshida, T., Taguchi, H. and Ryu, D.D.Y. (1985) Cellulose Production by Solid State Fermentation System. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 27, 1450-1454.
[15] Akinfemi, A., Adu, O.A. and Doherty, F. (2009) Assessment of the Nutritive Value of Fungi Treated Maize Cob Using in Vitro Gas Production Technique. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 21.
[16] Henk, L.L. and Linden, J.C. (1992) Simultaneous Ensiling and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Structural Polysaccharides. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 14, 923-930.
[17] Parawira, W. and Khosa, E.M. (2008) Biotechnology Research, Development, Applications and Management in Zimbabwe: Review. Scientific Research and Essay, 4, 825-841.
[18] Scheirlinck, T., De Meutter, J., Arnaut, G., Joos, H., Claeyssens, M. and Michiels, F. (1990) Cloning and Expression of Cellulase and Xylanase Genes in Lactobacillus plantarum. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 33, 534-541.
[19] Shelke, S.K., Thakur, S.S. and Amrutkar, S.A. (2011) Effect of Pre Partum Supplementation of Rumen Protected Fat and Protein on the Performance of Murrah Buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 81, 946-950.
[20] Thornton, P.K. (2010) Review Livestock Production: Recent Trends, Future Prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2853-2867.
[21] Edwards, H.M., Douglas, M.W., Parsons, C.M. and Baker, D.H. (2000) Protein and Energy Evaluation of Soybean Meals Processed from Genetically Modified High-Protein Soybeans. Poultry Science, 79, 525-527.
[22] Dschaak, C.M. (2012) Use of Rumen Modifiers to Manipulate Ruminal Fermentation and Improve Nutrient Utilization and Lactational Performance of Dairy Cows.
[23] Etherton, T.D., Bauman, D.E., Beattie, C.W., Bremel, C.W., Cromwell, G.L., Kapur, V., Varner, G., Wheeler, M.B., Wiedmann, M., et al. (2003) Biotechnology in Animal Agriculture: An Overview. The Council for Agricultural Science and Technology.
[24] Fahmy, W.G., Bahaa, A.O., Murphy, M.R., Nombekela, S.W., Corley III, R.N. and Zhu, J.S. (1998) Effect of Defaunation and Amino Acid Supplementation on Growth and Amino Acid Balance in Sheep. University of Illinois Extension.
[25] Croissant, G., Meton, B., Miller, D. and Kellog, W. (1976) Biotechnology Journal. New Mexico State University Agricultural Experiment Station, Las Cruces.
[26] European Commission (2000) The Europeans and Biotechnology (Eurobarometer 52.1). European Commission, Brussels.
[27] Madan, M.L. (2005) Animal Biotechnology: Applications and Economic Implications in Developing Countries. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics), 24, 127-139.
[28] Spangenberg, G., Kalla, R., Lidgett, A., Sawbridge, T., Ong, E.K. and John, U. (2001) Transgenesis and Genomics in Molecular Breeding of Forage Plants.
[29] Wieczorek, A. (2003) Use of Biotechnology in Agriculture—Benefits and Risks.
[30] Dumas, A., Dijkstra, J. and France, J. (2008) Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: A Centenary Review. Journal of Agricultural Science, 146, 123-142.
[31] NRC (National Research Council) (2009) Emerging Technologies to Benefit Farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
[32] Pinstrup-Andersen, P. (1999) Agricultural Biotechnology, Trade, and the Developing Countries. AgBioForum, 2, 215-217.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.