Share This Article:

Effects of Different Potassium Stress on Leaf Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Maize (Zea Mays L.) at Seedling Stage

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:439KB) PP. 44-53
DOI: 10.4236/as.2016.71005    4,621 Downloads   5,507 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Leaf early senescence caused by nutrition deficiency is one of the major limitation reasons in the world crop production. Potassium (K) is one of important nutrient elements in crop growth, which modifies dozens of enzyme activations and controls stomatal movement of photosynthesis. The yield and quality of maize (Zea Mays L.) have been limited due to K deficiency in plough layer soil. However, the mechanism of K deficiency tolerance is not fully understood in maize. In this study, two inbred lines, 099 (tolerance to potassium deficiency) and 835 (sensitive to potassium deficiency) were carried out to investigate the variations of chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters related with senescence under different K+ concentrations in maize at seedling stage. The results showed that the Chlorophyll a, b and (a + b) of 835 were significantly decreased under different K deficiency treatments, whereas those of 099 were remained normal. In addition, 099 showed a lower stomatal restriction and higher electronic transition capacity under different K deficiency treatments. The variations of F0, Fv/Fm, ΦPSⅡ, qP and NPQ in 835 were largely higher than those in 099. These results indicated that the inbred line 099 tolerance to K deficiency could keep chlorophyll content to maintain photosynthesis and to alleviate the injury of PSII under K deficiency condition. This study should contribute to explaining the physiological mechanism tolerance nutrition deficiency and improving breeding program in maize.

Received 16 December 2015; accepted 25 January 2016; published 28 January 2016

1. Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important cereal crops world-wide as well as an important source of feed, fibre, and biofuel. Potassium (K) as one of the essential nutrients for crop plays an important role in crop growth and development, metabolism and yield formation process [1] [2] . Because of long-term agricultural production of existing cultivated land, there is about 60% of massive arable land potassium deficiency, which inhibit crop yield and quality improvement [3] [4] . Meanwhile, the price of K fertilizers has been rapidly increased with rising energy prices, which lead to increased input in crop production. In Northeast China, an insufficient supply of K in soils often limits maize production to meet the demand for food from the growing population [4] -[6] . Therefore, it has been proposed that screening maize genotypes efficient use of potassium and clarifying the physiological mechanism of tolerance to potassium deficiency can reduce the use of expensive K fertilizers in agriculture [7] - [9] .

The leaf senescence shortens the duration of the photosynthesis after heading, and reduces the photosynthetic production accumulation [10] - [12] . Potassium deficiency in plants usually induces brown scorching and curling of leaf tips as well as chlorosis (yellowing) between leaf veins, which accelerate leaf senescence. Leaf photosynthesis consists of the several physiological processes, including light harvesting, photosystem II (PSII) photochemistry and CO2 assimilation [13] . Potassium deficiency disrupted the leaf photosynthetic organ, and led to declining in net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, RuBPcase activity and obviously decreasing grain production in rice [14] . The study in soybean showed that a relatively high content of Chl a, b and (a + b), especially the increase of Chl a content in K efficiency variety, resulted in a high ability of photosynthesis. The effective transfer of photosynthetic electron was another factor in maintaining the ability, while the significant changes of those parameters led to decrease of photosynthesis ability for K inefficiency variety [15] .

Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements have increasingly been used as a non-invasive tool in leaf ecophysiological studies. This method has been used extensively to investigate the response of plants to environmental stress, including the effects of low potassium on the photosynthetic apparatus of crops both in a controlled environment and in the field [16] [17] . In particular, it can assess PSII electron (e) transport efficiency simultaneously, a number of photosynthesis parameters underlying physiological responses to environmental variables can be estimated [18] [19] . Increasing Nitrogen (N) nutrition could improve the PSII potential activity, increased maximum quantum yield in wheat, whereas decreased non-photochemical quenching and increased the net photosynthetic rate (Pn). However, nitrogen deficiency could decrease the quantum yield of PSII electron transport and the maximal efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) photochemistry rate. Nevertheless, little has been reported about the relations of leaf senescence, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence.

In present study, we designed an experiment to explore the different expression of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence using two typical maize inbred lines under four potassium treatment levels. Meanwhile, we want to verify the mechanization of resistance to senescence and the physiological mechanism of higher photosynthesis productivity in maize inbred lines tolerant to K deficiency.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Experimental Design

Two maize inbred line screened in our previous study, 099 (tolerance to K+ deficiency) and 835 (sensitive to K+ deficiency), were carried out to compare the different in hydroponic method at the experiment station of Shenyang Agricultural University. After disinfecting in 7% NaClO3 solution, the selected full and uniform seed were germinated at 25˚C in waterish sand on June 28, 2014. When two leaves were fully expanded, 12 seedlings per inbred line were washed with distilled water and carefully transplanted into an experimental lightproof plastic pot in the rainproof greenhouse under natural environment. The pot was 50 cm × 35 cm × 15 cm and contained 20 L nutrient solution. The row spacing was 7.5 cm and the plant spacing was 6.5 cm.

2.2. Treatment

The nutrient solution was modified with 1/2 Hoagland’s nutrient solution and Arnon microelement, containing 2000 μmol Ca(NO3)2∙4H2O, 1000 μmol MgSO4∙7H2O, 500 μmol NH4H2PO4, 100 μmol FeSO4∙7H2O, 100 μmol EDTA, 23 μmol∙H3BO3, 6.3 μmol MnSO4∙H2O, 0.16 μmol CuSO4∙5H2O, 0.383 μmol ZnSO4∙7H2O, 0.8092 μmol (NH4)6Mo7O24. Four levels of K+ treatment were adjusted at 0 mmol∙L1, 0.625mmol∙L−1, 1.25mmol∙L1 and 2.5 mmol∙L1 (control) using KNO3. A randomized complete block design was employed using a 2-way factorial arrangement of treatments with three replications for each treatment. The oxygen was pumped to nutrient solution for 45 min every 15 min by automatic control electric pump. The pH value of solution was adjusted to 6.0 everyday by 0.1 mol/L NaOH or HCl and the solutions were replaced every week. After 9 days of treatment, the new expanded leaves of three representative seedlings per inbred line were selected to measure chlorophyll content, gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in each treatment. All measurements were carried out between 9:30 and 11:30.

2.3. Measurement

2.3.1. Chlorophyll (Chl) Content

Chl a, b and Chl (a + b) were measured according to the methods of Li et al. (2011) [20] . Every Sample containing 100 mg of fresh leaf was extracted by 10 mL acetone and ethylalcohol (1:1, v/v) at dark place for 24 h until the sample changed to white [21] . Pigment concentrations were measured by using an UV-spectrophoto- meter (Shimadzu UV-1601, Japan). Then the absorbance was recorded at 645 nm and 663 nm.

2.3.2. Gas Exchange Parameters

Gas exchange was measured with a CIRAS-2 portable open-flow gas exchange system attached to internal LED with red/white light source (PP systems, Hansatech, UK). The chamber was set at airflow rate of 100 mL∙min−1, CO2 concentration of 390 ± 5 μmol∙mol1, photosynthetic phtoton flux density of 1200 μmol∙m−2∙s−1. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) were measured on the upper fully expanded leaf.

2.3.3. Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters

Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured with FMS-2 (Hansatech, UK) at the same leaves after keeping in the dark for 20 min, including minimal fluorescence (F0), the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm), actual photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII), photochemical quenching (qP), non- photochemical quenching (NPQ).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The mean values of three replications were calculated for each trait and used in data analysis using Excel 2013. Data among the different treatments and inbred lines were analyzed using TWO-way ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05) method. The analysis was carried out using SPSS22.0 software for windows 8.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of K+ Deficiency on Chl Content

The variations of Chl a, Chl b and Chl a + b content were shown in Table 1. With the K+ concentration decreasing, the value of Chl a, Chl b and Chl (a + b) in 835 and 099 were largely reduced. The Chl a, Chl b and Chl (a + b) of 835 were significant decreased comparing with CK at 0.625 mmol/L. The Chl a and (a + b) of 835 were significantly decreased from 2.5 mmol/L to 0 mmol/L, while those of 099 were only slightly decreased. Under the same K+ concentration, the Chl a, Chl b and Chl (a + b) of 099 were significantly higher than those of 835.

3.2. Effects of K+ Deficiency on Photosynthetic Characteristics

3.2.1. Net Photosynthetic Rate (Pn)

With the K+ concentration decreasing, the two inbred lines showed different declining (Figure 1). Comparing with the control, the Pn of 835 were significantly decreased at 0 mmol/L, 0.625 mmol/L and 1.25 mmol/L by 70.73%, 29.87%, 19.68%, respectively. However, the Pn of 099 were little decreased by 61.07%, 12.60% and 4.53% under K deficiency. Although there was no difference between 099 and 835 in control, the Pn of 099 were significantly higher than 835 at 0.625 mmol/L and 1.25 mmol/L, by 25.88% and 20.07%.

3.2.2. Intercellular CO2 Concentration (Ci)

The Ci of two inbred lines was decreased with the K+ concentration increasing (Figure 2). There was no differ-

Table 1. Effects of potassium deficiency on chlorophyll content between two maize inbred lines.

Figure 1. Effect of different K+ concentration on Pn in two inbred lines.

Figure 2. Effect of different K+ concentration on Ci in two inbred lines.

ence in the control, whereas those of 835 were slightly higher than those of 099 at 0 mmol/L, 0.625 mmol/L and 1.25 mmol/L, by 6.03%, 7.09% and 5.60%. The Ci of 099 and 835 were significant increasing by 90.77% and 96.26% at 0 mmol/L, respectively.

3.2.3. Stomatal Conductance (Gs)

With the K+ concentration decreasing, the Gs of 835 and 099 were significantly declined (Figure 3). Comparing with control, the Gs of 099 and 835 were decreased by 10.49%, 20.65%, 41.30% and 17.74%, 33.87%, 60.97% from 2.5 mmol/L to 0 mmol/L. Under K deficiency, those of 099 were significantly higher than those of 835 at 0 mmol/L and 0.625 mmol/L, whereas there was no significantly under other treatments.

3.2.4. Transpiration Rate (Tr)

The Tr of 099 were decreased from 4.65 mmol CO2 m−2∙s−1 to 3.04 mmol CO2 m−2∙s−1 with the K+ concentration decreasing (Figure 4), while the Tr of 835 were little declined from 4.35 mmol CO2 m−2∙s−1 to 2.66 mmol CO2 m−2∙s−1. It was showed that the Tr of 835 were larger decreased than those of 099 under K deficiency. There was not significantly different between two inbred lines at 1.25 mmol/L and 2.5 mmol/L, whereas the Tr of 099 was significantly higher than that of 835 at 0.625 mmol/L.

3.3. Effects of K Deficiency on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters

3.3.1. Minimal Fluorescence (F0)

With the decreasing of K+ concentration, the F0 of two inbred lines were largely increased (Figure 5). The F0 of 099 was decreased by 21.58% at 0 mmol/L comparing with control, whereas that of 835 was significantly decreased 45.06%. Under K deficiency, the F0 of 835 were largely increased from 2.5 mmol/L to 0 mmol/L by

Figure 3. Effect of different K+ concentration on Gs in two inbred lines.

Figure 4. Effect of different K+ concentration on Tr in two inbred lines.

13.92%, 10.89% and 6.91%, whereas that of 099 was slightly increased.

3.3.2. Maximum Quantum Efficiency of PSII Photochemistry (Fv/Fm)

The Fv/Fm of two inbred lines was decreased from 2.5 mmol/L to 0 mmol/L (Figure 6). The Fv/Fm of 099 was significantly higher than those of 835 at 0 mmol/L and 0.625 mmol/L, by 25.47%, 10.61% respectively. The Fv/Fm of 835 at 0.625 mmol/L was significantly lower than control, whereas there was no different for 099.

3.3.3. Actual Photochemical Efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII)

The ΦPSII of two inbred lines were decreased with the decreasing of the K+ concentration (Figure 7). The ΦPSII of 099 were significantly higher than that of 835 from 0 mmol/L to 2.5 mmol/L by 88.66%, 92.35%, 42.80% and 30.33%, respectively. Comparing with the control, the ΦPSII of 099 was not significantly lower except at 0 mmol/L, whereas that of 835 were largely decreased at 0 mmol/L and 0.625 mmol/L.

3.3.4. Photochemical Quenching (qP)

The qP is commonly used to reflect the degree of opening of the reaction center. With the decreasing of K+ concentration, the qP of 835 were largely decreased from 2.5 mmol/L to0mmol/L (Figure 8). The qP of 099 were

Figure 5. Effect of different K+ concentration on F 0 in two inbred lines.

Figure 6. Effect of different K+ concentration on Fv/Fm in two inbred lines.

Figure 7. Effect of different K+ concentration on ΦPSII in two inbred lines.

Figure 8. Effect of different K+ concentration on qP in two inbred lines.

significantly higher than those of 835 under K deficiency. Comparing with the control, the qP of 835 were significantly decreased by 38.49% and 18.29% at 0 mmol/L and 0.625 mmol/L.

3.3.5. Non-Photochemical Quenching (NPQ)

The NPQ reflects the change of the ability of plant heat dissipation. The NPQ of two inbred lines increased gradually from 2.50 mmol/L to 0mmol/L (Figure 9). The NPQ of 099 were largely higher than those of 835 at different K+ concentration. At 0mmol/L K+ concentration, the NPQ of 099 was significantly increased by 21.79%, while that of 835 was slightly increased.

4. Discussion

Leaf senescence comprises a series of biochemical and physiological events [11] [22] . The ability to maintain green leaf area is one of the important physiological traits that have an implication on yield potential related to increasing assimilate availability [23] - [25] . However, several reports has described that many abiotic stresses, including nutrient deficiency, could not result in uniform symptoms, but rather on visible patches or color variation on leaf surfaces and margin [26] . Chlorophyll degradation during senescence is an early and, for membrane polypeptides, essential event. If chlorophyll breakdown in senescence is prevented, the process of senescence could be delayed. In the present study, the Chl a, b and Chl (a + b) of 099 were not varied significantly at

Figure 9. Effect of different K+ concentration on NPQ in two inbred lines.

0.625 mmol/L and 1.250 mmol/L, whereas those of 099 were significantly decreased at 0 mmol/L. To the contrary, those of 835 were significantly declined under K deficiency comparing with control. Under the same K+ concentration, the the Chl a, b and Chl (a + b) of 099 were significantly higher than those of 835. Those results showed that the progress of leaf senescence was more slowly in 099 than in 835 under potassium deficiency stress.

Leaf photosynthesis consists of the several physiological processes, that is, light harvesting, PSII photochemistry, and CO2 assimilation [13] . The photosynthetic functions, including PSII photochemistry, were inhibited as a result of nutrients deficiency, which directly influence the photosynthetic apparatus through biosynthesis and functioning of key photosynthetic components [27] . For example, nitrogen, sulphur and iron deficiencies could directly influence the synthesis of protein complexes in photosynthetic reactions [28] [29] . Potassium plays an important role in stomatal function by maintaining turgor pressure [30] . Under potassium deficiency stress, the leaf net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic phosphorylation activity and electron transfer energy were decreased in rice, cotton [31] [32] . In addition, Xu et al. (2010) assumed that photosynthetic CO2 conductance limit was divided into stomatal limitation and non-stomatal limitation, which the later is largely concerned with the transmission of CO2 [33] . In the present study, the Pn, Ci, Gs and Tr of 099 and 835 were no significant different at 2.5 mmol/L. However, the Pn, Gs and Tr of 835 were significantly decreased under K deficiency and the Ci was largely increased. On the contrary, those of 099 were slightly affected under K deficiency. These results demonstrated that the photosynthetic system of 099 tolerance to K deficiency could remain natural function under K deficiency.

In recent years, the measurement of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters has provided a rapid non-destruc- tive method to obtain precise information about the state of photosynthetic apparatus and especially of PSII [34] [35] . Osório et al. (2014) reported that Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, NPQ, qP) showed a significant variation with greater values in midrib areas in strawberry on 42th day after Fe deficiency [26] . In addition, Kalaji et al. (2014) demonstrated that the electron donation by oxygen evolving complex (OEC) was significantly decreased in Mg and Ca deficient plants [27] . However, Sulphur deficiency resulted in a limitation of electron transport beyond PSI, probably on account of decreasing in the PSI content or activity of PSI electron acceptors. To the contrary, they considered that the PSII activity was affected much more than PSI in Ca deficiency plants. To further explore the internal causes of decline in photosynthesis due to potassium deficiency, we conducted chlorophyll fluorescence parameters measured at different K+ concentrations. It can be seen from the results that in the condition of potassium deficiency, ΦPSII of 099 and 835 were declined, which was conrresponding with the increasing of F0. These results showed that the change and photoinhibition in 099 were lesser than in 835 under K potassium. The variable fluorescence and maximum fluorescence reflect the electron transport system smoothly or not in PSII. In the present study, the electron transferred in 099 was more smoothly than that in 835 under different K deficiency. These results can explain that PSII of 099 suffered damage to a lesser extent, maintaining relative high photochemical efficiency and strong photosynthetic capacity.

5. Conclusion

In the present study, two typical maize inbred lines were carried out to measure the different of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence at different K+ concentration. The results indicated that the Pn, Gs, Tr, Fv/Fm, qP, ΦPSII and ETR of 099, tolerance to K deficiency, were significantly higher than those of 835 under K+ deficiency treatments, whereas the Ci and F0 of 099 were lower. These results indicated that the 099 could prolong leaf senescence and have higher photosynthesis to maintain plant growth under K+ deficiency condition.

Acknowledgements

The work was financially supported by the Tianzhu Mountian Scholars Support Plan of Shenyang Agricultural University, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31301259), the National Key Technology R&D Program (2013BAD07B03).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Zhao, X. , Du, Q. , Zhao, Y. , Wang, H. , Li, Y. , Wang, X. and Yu, H. (2016) Effects of Different Potassium Stress on Leaf Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Maize (Zea Mays L.) at Seedling Stage. Agricultural Sciences, 7, 44-53. doi: 10.4236/as.2016.71005.

References

[1] Cao, M.J., Yu, H.Q. and Yan, H.K. (2007) Difference in Tolerance to Potassium Deficiency between Two Maize Inbred Lines. Plant Production Science, 10, 42-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/pps.10.42
[2] Marschner, H., and Marschner, P. (2011) Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Elsevier, London, UK.
[3] Pettigrew, W.T. (2008) Potassium Influences on Yield and Quality Production for Maize, Wheat, Soybean and Cotton. Physiologia Plantarum, 133, 670-681.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01073.x
[4] Jin, J.Y. (2012) Changes in the Efficiency of Fertiliser Use in China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 92, 1006-1009.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4700
[5] Römheld, V. and Kirkby, E.A. (2010) Research on Potassium in Agriculture: Needs and Prospects. Plant Soil, 335, 155-180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0520-1
[6] Coskun, D., Britto, D.T. and Kronzucker, H.J. (2014) The Physiology of Channel-Mediated K+ Acquisition in Roots of Higher Plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 151, 305-312.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12174
[7] Rengel, Z. and Damon, P.M. (2008) Crops and Genotypes Differ in Efficiency of Potassium Uptake and Use. Physiologia Plantarum, 133, 624-636.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01079.x
[8] Fageria, N.K. (2009) The Use of Nutrients in Crop Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
[9] Guo, H.R., Yu, H.Q. and Jiang, C.J. (2009) Difference of Root Traits and Potassium Efficiency in Different Tolerant Maize at Seedling Stage under Potassium Deficiency. Crops, 129, 62-65. (In Chinese)
[10] Gentinetta, E., Ceppi, D., Perico, G., Motto, M. and Salamini, F.A. (1986) Major Gene for Delayed Senescence in Maize: Pattern of Photosynthates Accumulation and Inheritance. Plant Breeding, 97, 193-203.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1986.tb01053.x
[11] Lim, P.O., Kim, H.J. and Nam, H.G. (2007) Leaf Senescence. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 58, 115-136.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105316
[12] Stefan, H. (2009) Stay-Green Regulates Chlorophyll and Chlorophyll-Binding Protein Degradation during Senescence. Trends in Plant Science, 14, 155-162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.01.002
[13] Etsushi, K., Ken, J. I., Satoshi, U., Keiichi, O., Cevayir, C. and Shizuo, A. (2011) Silica Crystals and Aluminum Salts Regulate the Production of Prostaglandin in Macrophages via NALP3 Inflammasome-Independent Mechanisms. Immunity, 34, 514-526.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.019
[14] Liu, J.C., Li, J.S., Mi, G.H., Chen, F.J. and Zhang, F.S. (2009) QTL Mapping of Seedling Growth Traits and Grain Yield under Two Nitrogen Conditions in Maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 42, 3413-3420. (In Chinese)
[15] Jiang, C.C., Chen, F., Gao, X.Z., Lu, J.W., Wan, K.Y., Nian, F.Z. and Wang, Y.H. (2008) Study on the Nutrition Characteristics of Different K Use Efficiency Cotton Genotypes to K Deficiency Stress. Agricultural Science in China, 7, 740-745.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60109-1
[16] Haldimann, P., Fracheboud, Y. and Stamp, P. (1996) Photosynthetic Performance and Resistance to Photoinhibition of Zea mays L. Leaves Grown at Suboptimal Temperature. Plant, Cell and Environment, 19, 85-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00229.x
[17] Wang, X.G., Zhao, X.H., Jiang, C.J., Li, C.H., Cong, S., Wu, D., Chen, Y.Q., Yu, H.Q. and Wang, C.Y. (2015) Effects of Potassium Deficiency on Photosynthesis and Photoprotection Mechanisms in Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14, 856-863.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60848-0
[18] Laisk, A. and Loreto, F. (1996) Determining Photosynthetic Parameters from Leaf CO2 Exchange and Chlorophyll Fluorescence: Rubisco Specificity Factor, Dark Respiration in the Light, Excitation Distribution between Photosystems, Alternative Electron Transport and Mesophyll Diffusion Resistance. Plant Physiology, 110, 903-912.
[19] Peterson, R.B., Oja, V. and Laisk, A. (2001) Chlorophyll Fluorescence at 680 and 730 nm and Leaf Photosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research, 70, 185-196.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017952500015
[20] Li, X.T., Cao, P., Wang, X.G., Cao, M.J. and Yu, H.Q. (2011) C Comparison of Gas Exchange and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Low-Potassium-Tolerant and -Sensitive Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars under Low-Potassium Condition. Photosynthetica, 49, 633-636.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11099-011-0073-4
[21] Huang, C.J., Wei, G., Jie, Y.C. Wang, L.C., Zhou, H.F., Ran, C.Y., Huang, Z.C., Jia, H.J. and Anjum S.A. (2014) Effects of Concentrations of Sodium Chloride on Photosynthesis, Antioxidative Enzymes, Growth and Fiber Yield of Hybrid Ramie. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 76, 86-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.12.021
[22] Thomas, H. and Smart, C.M. (1993) Crops That Stay Green. Annals of Applied Biology, 123, 193-219.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1993.tb04086.x
[23] Thomas, H. and Howarth, C.J. (2000) Five Ways to Stay Green. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 329-337.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.suppl_1.329
[24] Zhang, Z., Li, G., Gao, H., Zhang, L., Yang, C., Liu, P. and Meng, Q. (2012) Characterization of Photosynthetic Performance during Senescence in Stay-Green and Quick-Leaf-Senescence Zea mays L. Inbred Lines. PLoS ONE, 7, e42936.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042936
[25] Gregersen, P.L., Culetic, A., Boschian, L. and Krupinska, K. (2013) Plant Senescence and Crop Productivity. Plant Molecular Biology, 82, 603-622.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-013-0013-8
[26] Osório, J., Osório, M.L., Correia, P.J., de Varennes, A. and Pestana, M. (2014) Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging as a Tool to Understand the Impact of Iron Deficiency and Resupply on Photosynthetic Performance of Strawberry Plants. Scientia Horticulturae, 165, 148-155.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.10.042
[27] Kalaji, H.M., Oukarroum, A., Alexandrov, V., Kouzmanova, M., Brestic, M., Zivcak, M., Samborska, I.A., Cetner, M.D., Allakhverdiev, S.I. and Goltsev, V. (2014) Identification of Nutrient Deficiency in Maize and Tomato Plants by in Vivo Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Measurements. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 81, 16-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.03.029
[28] Ciompi, S., Gentili, E., Guidi, L. and Soldatini, G.F., (1996) The Effect of Nitrogen Deficiency on Leaf Gas Exchange and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters in Sunflower. Plant Science, 118, 177-184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(96)04442-1
[29] D’Hooghe, P., Escamez, S., Trouverie, J. and Avice, J. C., (2013) Sulphur Limitation Provokes Physiological and Leaf Proteome Changes in Oilseed Rape That Lead to Perturbation of Sulphur, Carbon and Oxidative Metabolisms. BMC Plant Biology, 13, 23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-23
[30] Pervez, H., Ashraf, M. and Makhdum, M.I. (2004) Influence of Potassium Nutrition on Gas Exchange Characteristics and Water Relations in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Photosynthetica, 42, 251-255.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:PHOT.0000040597.62743.5b
[31] Jiang, D.A., Lu, Q., Xue, J.M. and Xie, X.M. (1992) Regulation of Potassium Nutrition to Photosynthetic Function and Light-Energy Absorption of Rice Leaf. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Zhejiangensis, 18, 25-29. (In Chinese)
[32] Zhao, D.L., Oosterhuis, D.M. and Bednarz, C.W. (2001) Influences of Potassium Deficiency on Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll Content, and Chloroplast Ultrastructure of Cotton Plants. Photosyntetica, 39, 103-199.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012404204910
[33] Xu, Z., Zhou, G. and Shimizu, H. (2010) Plant Responses to Drought and Rewatering. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 5, 649-654.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.5.6.11398
[34] Gorbe, E. and Calatayud, A. (2012) Applications of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Technique in Horticultural Research: A Review. Scientia Horticulturae, 138, 24-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.02.002
[35] Lee, S.H., Sakuraba, Y., Lee, T., Kim, K.W., An, G., Lee, H.Y. and Paek N.C. (2014) Mutation of Oryza Sativa CORONATINE INSENSITIVE 1b (OsCOI1b) Delays Leaf Senescence. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 6, 562- 576.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.